Stuart's take on the trailer debate
MB I guess we will never know the true results of the test audience.
I've not seen this scene in the context of the movie - you have - and I would have to agree with you on this point. Definitely seems a little odd.Quote from: ProfStokes on March 19, 2012, 07:22:47 AMI've bemoaned the Barnabas/Angelique/tongue scene elsewhere. It struck me as way over-the-top and was something I would have expected from an Austin Powers movie.
I've bemoaned the Barnabas/Angelique/tongue scene elsewhere. It struck me as way over-the-top and was something I would have expected from an Austin Powers movie.
Interesting that Graham-Smith says the test screening went over great. I wonder if that's the official result or simply his own general impression because, as per ProfStokes' observations, it appeared that much of the audience was into it?
I don't understand why fans throw around the word "betrayal" like that. Rationality is seldom rewarded, I guess. And the movie could not have been done without the wholehearted support of the Curtis estate. Intellectual property is meant to be purchased and used. If this movie turns out to royally suck, nothing bad happens to the original or the revival. It's just another movie that sucks.... is this new DS movie somehow worse because it has more humor in it? Might be a parody?
I kind of understand the position of people who feel "betrayed." My interpretation of their plight has nothing to do with Burton/SGS/Depp doing their own thing with the property, though. It has more to do with the fact that Depp and others had been saying things that seemed to please the fans, making certain fans (myself included) inclined to believe their film would be a Gothic Thriller with some trademark Burton comedy. I was not prepared for the kind of trailer I saw. So, I think fans who use the term betrayed should use the word "duped" instead.
back in January '08 Jim Pierson remarked in an article on the MPI Web site about how Barnabas coping with the modern world be featured in the film and it was something they had planned to do had the '04 pilot gone to series. And while he didn't use the word "funny," he did imply that there would be humor to it in the film. But I seem to recall that the first time the word "funny" was used was when Richard Zanuck used it in May '10, which not incidentally was before Seth Grahame-Smith became involved with the film (he wasn't brought on board until July)
Zanuck: "...it'll be very funny..." Whoa, that's news to me!
Burton and Depp both claimed they were fans and that they wanted to get it "right." Based on the trailer alone, it seems their idea of doing it right is spoofing it and pointing out the absurdity of the situations. Of course, this might be WBs marketing strategy and there is likely more to it than what we see.