It's definitely not accurate - and one would presume or at least hope that an official document would not rely on inaccurate info on IMDb but on factual info provided by the studio. And as it doesn't, it makes me question everything about the synopsis as well as who it was who typed up what's on Facebook. It's like just some random person not really connected to the film gathered the info about the test screening's time/location and then added the synopsis to it based on whatever they could find on the Internet.
Did you guys read the dialogue transcription from the long trailer seen by the Ross person?There was no doubt in my mind that that was intended to be a trailer for a product in the "horror comedy" category.
I'm actually wondering if people attending the test screening will have to sign confidentiality agreements? I have no idea if that's general practice or not.
I do believe it is common to have to sign a confidentiality agreement. However, I believe that people are allowed to give general impressions and overall opinions- just no details.
Previously WB described it as a Gothic Thriller. The Thrill must be gone.
I've never had the privilege of attending a test screening, but I do believe it is common to have to sign a confidentiality agreement. However, I believe that people are allowed to give general impressions and overall opinions- just no details.