Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Philippe Cordier

1216
I've never heard of anyone long dead being "thanked" in a book's acknowlegements. Also, reading the website link midnite provided, one would get the impression that they were quoting a still-living person.



1217
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Chicken Little Was Right!
« on: October 11, 2002, 05:18:49 AM »
Interesting how you tracked those posters down, doombuggy. The second one looks familiar.

Still would like to know about the "Garfield" painting in the frame, though.

I had never heard of "rubons" -- don't remember those from my youth -- or "The Turtles," for that matter!


1218
Current Talk '02 II / Re: A DS Christmas Carol
« on: October 11, 2002, 05:12:19 AM »
Thanks to everyone for providing further information about this.  Dan Curtis had a fascinating idea -- I think it would have resulted in a surge in ratings, attracting people who had never watched DS.

1219
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Chicken Little Was Right!
« on: October 10, 2002, 05:41:46 AM »
At the end of yesterday's second episode (the scene must have been David's room, but I can't remember what the scene was about) you could see that "Garfield" picture I was talking about -- it looks like a drawing of a big, orange cat. It's framed and hanging high on the wall to the left of David's bed.

I'm assuming, then, that this is the "Rock and Roll Fillmore West" poster that doombuggy mentions, though it's still unclear to me if this depicts a big cat.

Well, I may have to eat my words from a month or two ago when I voiced my doubts that David's room is located in the tower.  MB, I think, stated that David's room is the second floor of the tower.  Today's opening shot of the tower, then shot to David's room, did imply that.  The windows do look the same and the walls of David's room do appear to be curved.

1220
Current Talk '02 II / Chicken Little Was Right!
« on: October 09, 2002, 05:35:13 AM »
Today's first episode was the scariest one I remember in a long time ... I actually jumped in the last scene when Maggie opened the storeroom door!  (Can't wait to view the second episode later tonight -- it's such a thrill having three weeks' worth of episodes I've never seen!)

I wish I could make out better what some of the knick-knacks are in David's room. For the last couple of days I've been seeing something that says "Chicken Little Was Right."  Any ideas as to what this is?  There's something that used to be on the wall, an orange drawing, that may be on the dresser now, that looks like a picture of "Garfield" (the cat).  Don't think that's possible, though.  And is that the crystal ball on a bedside table?

1221
Current Talk '02 II / Re: A DS Christmas Carol
« on: October 09, 2002, 05:29:25 AM »
I had never thought about seeing the DS cast working ensemble in something completely different.  I'd be interested in hearing more detail about Dan Curtis' proposed "Christmas Carol."  Was this to be for TV?  Was he seriously working on the idea?  What happened?

Note:  If the answers to these questions are in the web chat interview mentioned, could someone direct me to where I could read that interview?  Or do you need AOL or some type of membership somewhere?

Thanks!


1222
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Re: Anita Bolster Sighting
« on: October 05, 2002, 10:54:53 PM »
Now I wish I had taped that ("The Woman in White") a second time -- the one I taped before is at my parents'.  Anyway, I only caught a glimpse of it here and there during this airing.  Was Anita Bolster (=Bathia Mapes?) the one with the very dark brunette thick hair, worn somewhat similar to Agnes Moorhead's?  (And, incidentally, I think that's about my favorite performance of Miss Moorhead!).  Coincidentally, I just commented on this movie in the Victoria Winters Parent thread.

I, too, would be curious to find out whom Anita Bolster played in "The Picture of Dorian Gray."

It's funny, I think of both of those pictures in somewhat similar terms.  Both start off rather woodenly and not too interestingly, IMO, but pick up speed after QUITE a while and prove to be well worth one's patience.

1223
Current Talk '02 II / Re: And sometimes they get the details right!
« on: October 05, 2002, 10:45:39 PM »
I like the way it's so easy to cleanup after mauling someone to death -- just whip off the bloody shirt and whip on a new one -- no mess, no fuss!

I did think it was kind of icky the way Barnabas so nonchalantly rolled up that bloody shirt and carried it around without putting it into a bag or something.  But I guess he's not bothered by blood ...

1224
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Matthew Morgan's cottage
« on: October 05, 2002, 10:39:19 PM »
Quote
Another thing that struck me funny was when the children were hiding out on Maggie and she found them right outside of Collinwood near the woods after the kids yelled to her "we're over here!"  Well, who the heck was that calling "David"  "Amy?"  That definetely wasn't Maggie's voice!! It sounded more like a man to me?  This was just before they all headed over to the cottage after hearing Mrs. J's screams.

I think it was KLS talking through her cupped hand (like a megaphone) to make it sound like she was a long ways off when she was probably just a few steps away on the soundstage.

:)

1225
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Certifiable proof!
« on: October 04, 2002, 03:54:16 AM »
Kuanyin, your commentary was hysterical.

I had wanted to note an episode a couple of days previous to this that I thought had to be the funniest DS episode I can remember.  It was one where those kids were up to their devilish schemes ... which resulted in Mrs. Johnson getting "locked in" the cottage.  I had the best laugh I'd had in a while when David ducked down outside the cottage door so Mrs. Johnson couldn't see him.

I needed another laugh about the time I saw this post.  Thank you!  :)


1226
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Victoria Winter's Parents
« on: October 01, 2002, 08:58:36 AM »
Quote
You bring up some really good stuff, I had never heard the Jamison as daddy theory. Could it be, hmmm.....

I have always thought it was Lizzie. As you said, strongly implicated in the beginning. And I disagree that she would not be able to hide it. Who would make that so difficult? She had no parents alive at the time, presumably. (Kind of bites the Jamison theory, do we KNOW when her parents died? I thought it longer ago than Vicky's age.)


Assuming that Vicki was conceived/born approximately in 1947, Jamison Collins most certainly COULD have been alive.  Say he was about 10 years old (I'm simplifying for the sake of doing quick math in my head) in 1897, he would have only have been about 60 years old in 1947, making him a perfectly suitable candidate for being Victoria's father.

Does anyone know if it's ever stated when Jamison Collins died?  I know Elizabeth and or Roger do speak of him early on in the series, so he is mentioned ...

Quote
As heiress, she could pretty well do what she pleased. If she said she was going to Europe on an extended tour, it would have been accepted. And that was not an unlikely choice for a young woman in Lizzie's class and finances. We know Roger was away at school. We don't know of any long term staff other than Matthew Morgan, and he would not have questioned her going away for a while. I would not for a moment think that she hid away and gave birth at Collinwood.


My memory is rather hazy on this, but wouldn't Elizabeth already have been married to Paul Stoddard at this time, or very likely going with him and engaged if not already married?

1227
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Original Intent?
« on: October 01, 2002, 07:31:19 AM »
Quote
the above sounds all very typical of ds, write it from day to day, and the heck with the rest...but, they did seem to have some idea about magda and the curse.


I wondered what they were initially planning after today's first episode --  David and Amy, possessed by Quentin and Beth -- talk about "them" being against Quentin and Beth ... I got the impression that there were two people, a man and a woman, opposed to Quentin and Beth and possibly plotting against them.  And Beth/Amy warns Quentin/David to believe in "her" "powers."

Wonder what that was all about?

1228
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Natalie's Fate: Was it really Altered?
« on: October 01, 2002, 07:21:37 AM »
Quote
I wondered though when Barnabas told Ben to "go back to Collinwood and dispose of her things"  then he told him to "just tell my father that she went back to Martinique."  I could see this sounding somewhat normal if she had no family or living relatives left, but what's Andre gonna thing when his sister never shows up again?  

Cassandra -- this is a good point, but there is one way around it:  Barnabas actually said that Ben should say that Natalie had gone to Paris -- not "Martinique."  I remember this because it surprised me.  DS often doesn't flesh out some things that actually have been well-thought out (can't think of any specific examples offhand, but it does happen!).

If Natalie had gone to Paris, anything could have happened to her en route or after her arrival, whereas Andre's home is definitely in Martinique, which is where he would have gone after leaving the Eastern seabord.  The circumstances of a missing person who supposedly sailed to Europe would probably have been difficult to investigate in those days.

VAM wrote:
Natalie seemed oblivious to the peculiarities in Angelique's activities.

You can say that again! :)

1229
Current Talk '02 II / Victoria Winter's Parents
« on: October 01, 2002, 07:09:17 AM »
Now that Victoria Winters has left Collinwood, Collinsport, and the Dark Shadows story, it may be an appropriate time to re-examine the central mystery about her:  Who were her parents, and what was her connection with the Collins family?  Why did Elizabeth Collins Stoddard provide Victoria with a position at Collinwood, and why did she deny there was any particular meaning in her having done so to Roger, Vicki, and everyone else?

I apologize if I've somehow missed any recent threads dealing with this topic, but I haven't seen any direct discussion of this for some time.

I myself have vacillated on the solution to this mystery.  During my first viewing of the series when Sci-Fi began airing DS about four years ago beginning with the Laura the Phoenix storyline, I saw little evidence for Elizabeth being Vicki's mother, as has often been suggested.  Continuing to watch the show, the alternate possibility that Paul Stoddard was Vicki's father resulting from an affair seemed a much more likely and appealing possibility.

I later rethought this position when I saw the early episodes for the first time.  There seemed to be hints that Elizabeth had a guilty conscience with respect to Vicki -- she obviously knew more than she was telling about Vicki's history and had a particular purpose in bringing her to Collinwood.  At about that time, I saw an interview on TV with the adopted daughter of an actress who later discovered that her adoptive mother was actually her real mother, but I don't believe she ever confronted her mother with this information, and her mother (the famous actress) continued the charade.  (I can't remember any more who this actress was, but apparently this was an out-of-wedlock birth perhaps in the 1940s.)  This made me consider that something like that really could happen, that the psychology behind the mother's motives was realistic, though perhaps difficult to understand today.  Society has changed, sometimes for the better, in the past few decades.

Still, did anyone really get any hint when Vicki disappeared into the past that Elizabeth was truly watching her daughter dissolve before her eyes?  Any hints about such a relationship seem to have dropped by the wayside long ago.

In the series' early episodes, there seemed to be an effort to draw attention to the physical similarities between Elizabeth and Victoria.

One complication was the Betty Hanscomb portrait or drawing.  Although some (perhaps it was SheilaMarch) have theorized that this was actually a portrait of Elizabeth ("Betty") being a nickname, I am doubtful of that possibility.  It was established that there was a "B. Hanscomb" employed as a butler at Collinwood 20 - 25 years earlier.  I believe there was mention that he had a daughter, although I'm not 100 percent certain about this; however, it is a logical inference.  Sam Evans described Betty to Vicki as a local girl who had left town about 25 year earlier and died shortly after.

In keeping with the Gothic novel tradition (including Dickens, et al.), as well as common circumstances during the mid 20th century, this was almost certainly an implication that poor Betty had gotten pregnant and left town to have her illegitimate baby.

What interest would Elizabeth have in bringing the illegitimate daughter of a Collins butler to work at Collinwood so many years later?  And why would Elizabeth apparently have provided financial support to Vicki via the Garner law firm over the years?

It seem inconceivable that a young woman of Elizabeth Collins' status could have been pregnant and given birth without anyone knowing at the time -- and then have left the baby in a basket outside an orphanage.  No, it's far more likely that these would have been the actions of a much poorer girl with few connections -- someone like Betty Hanscombe, whose portrait shows her as almost a dead-ringer for Victoria Winters.

Elizabeth, it is to be noted, denied seeing any resemblance between the portrait and Victoria.  It is probable that she has an invested interest in keeping the truth of Vicki's parents from her.

That truth -- which was postulated by "Bob" on the VantageNet forum in July 2001 (I'm guessing this was Bob the Bartender, unless there was another Bob posting at that time whom I don't recall) -- was that Elizabeth was covering for another member of the Collins family:  her father, Jamison Collins.

Bob suggested that Jamison had a dalliance with his butler's daughter, and Elizabeth stepped in to help the girl when she (sometime later, in my opinion) learned what had happened.  Vicki, then, would be Elizabeth (and Roger's) half-sister -- hence Elizabeth's emotional connection and clandestine support.  In those days, few people, especially those of the Collins family's status -- would have been comfortable acknowledging an illegitimate half-sibling.  Yet we know that Elizabeth is a good, caring woman (witness her tender feelings toward David throughout the series, to Amy, etc.).  Her heart goes out to Vicki, but the emotional bond is not as strong as it would be had Vicki been a full sister or her own daughter.

This hypothesis also fits with what we later learn about Paul Stoddard, namely that Carolyn was his first-born child, whom he made a bargain over with "Mr. Best" (Death, personified).

This theory accounts for Vicki's resemblance to Elizabeth and also, very interestingly, makes her a Collins.

I believe Bob's theory resolves the mystery most satisfactorily and satisfyingly.  I give Bob the credit for supplying the outlines of this theory, which I have further fleshed out.  I would be interested in knowing if this was Bob's original idea or if he was drawing on someone else's previous suggestions.

I have identified four potential objections to this theory, none of which present insurmountable obstacles, in my opinion:

1.  Shadows on the Wall, the "story bible" for the series, states that Paul Stoddard is Victoria Winter's father, if memory serves correct.  I do find this an attractive possibility, but we should remember that a number of substantive changes and departures were made from this story bible as the series unfolded.  (For example, Roger was to be wicked and fall off Widow's hill very early on.)

2.  Joan Bennett's personal belief/testimony.  Miss Bennett apparently stated at a DS festival that she believed Elizabeth was Victoria's mother.  If Bennett acted under this assumption in giving an added layer of emotional depth to her performance (and I believe she did, at least early on), that still doesn't mean that she was in-the-know herself as to the solution to the mystery, just that this was a personal choice she made as an actor.

3.  Sam Evan's statement that he had painted Betty Hanscomb's portrait 25 years earlier, and that Betty had died a year or so later.  The problem this raises is that this would mean that Betty died at least a couple of years before Victoria was born.  It's possible that Sam was mistaken, and gave "25 years ago" as a rough estimate as to when the portrait was done.  I think there is a more likely and interesting possibility, though.  I think he was deliberately concealing the actual date and time frame from Vicki.  Sam most likely wished to "protect" Vicki from learning too much -- from concluding, as he obviously suspected, that Betty Hanscomb was Victoria's mother and that the Collins family was somehow involved.  Thirty-odd years ago, illegitimate births were still hushed up, especially in small towns, considered shameful by many, and Sam would hardly have felt it was his place to reveal his suspicions to Vicki.  So he throws her off the trail by padding the time frame by a year or two.

Significantly, Elizabeth does not tell Vicki, when confronted with the Betty Hansomb/portrait evidence that Betty had died three or four years before Vicki was born (she would know Vicki's age, of course).  Had this been the case, though, Elizabeth would almost certainly have said so.  Though she denied a resemblance between Betty's likeness and Vicki, she hadn't apparently felt comfortable with lying about factual matters that Vicki might someday check into, such as the date of Betty's death.

She would, however, wish to discourage Vicki from making any connection between Betty Hanscomb and the Collins family, and hence deny the physical resemblance.

4.  Finally, Dreams of the Dark.  This novel was sanctioned by DCP and reveals Elizabeth to have been Vicki's mother.  Although I have a great deal of positive things to say about this book, I have to say I will take issue with it on this one point.  The clues suggested in a 30-year-old daily drama were obviously complicated and not likely to be fresh in the minds of readers in 1999 or so, nor would many of today's readers be expected to be concerned with the minutiae of the matter.  It's obviously more emotionally powerful to have a simplified solution at the end of Dreams of the Dark that fits with many of the hints and suspicions some viewers would vaguely have remembered.  But remember that the actual solution isn't likely to have been the most obvious one -- the writers at the time most likely had a "twist" in mind, but sadly the entire mystery was completely dropped before this was revealed.

Although the scene in DOD where this was revealed was extremely well-executed, one aspect of it did not ring true for me -- and that was Elizabeth's apparent habitual occult ritual of protection for Vicki.  There is never any indication in the series that Elizabeth would have employed the occult, especially before the appearance of Barnabas on the scene.  Even then, Elizabeth voiced strong objections and even fear about the initial seances.  What we do see with respect to Elizabeth throughout the entire series is that she refers to prayer at times of distress.  It is more likely that Elizabeth's beliefs and practices fell within the conventional confines of a matron of a family steeped in tradition, and that if she had wished for the protection of Victoria from the time of her birth onward, she would have relied on the means most familiar to her with which she was comfortable -- prayer, not the practice of occult rituals.

1230
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Greetings from SheilaMarch
« on: October 01, 2002, 05:48:22 AM »
Those who were members of the VantageNet forum a couple of years ago will remember Ms. Sheila March, who was a frequent poster until about a year ago.  Many of us met Sheila in NYC at the festival in 2001; she was very helpful to me as a newcomer in NYC when I was planning one of my Manhattan excursions after the festival ended.  Many of us will also recall her beautiful professional art work that she shared on this forum after 9/11.

I recently heard from Sheila, and she asked me to say "hello" to everyone on the board.  She recalled how her participation on the forum began with the beginning of the 1897 storyline.

Unfortunately, she no longer has a computer or e-mail address, but she is looking into the possibility of using an Internet cafe or public library.

I certainly hope one of these options will work for her.  I know I've missed her incisive and insightful comments this past year!

Vlad