Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Philippe Cordier

991
Wilde's legal difficulties resulted from his relationship with Lord Alfred "Bosie" Douglas.  Although readers of a later time often assume that Dorian is a projection of Wilde's troubled paramour, in reality Dorian was inspired by John Gray, a conflicted aesthetic poet who flirted with Wilde for a time in the late 1880s.

I've read some of John Gray's poetry and really liked it.  I used his poem about working at a forge (he had a working class background) as a comparison with Pip's work at the forge in "Great Expectations" for a teaching plan I prepared (but which I will never be teaching -- slight change in plans).  I've wanted to read more of his poetry but I think it is difficult to obtain.  I was, however, rather aghast at the way he was portrayed, very briefly (by Ioan Gruffudd) in "Wilde," since I had read a biography of him which did not lead one to view him as the "boy-toy" of the movie version.

Apparently "Bosie" Douglas was also a very highly regarded poet of that era, and I liked what little I read of his work, too.

All before Pound and Eliot changed the poetry landscape forever.

992
Current Talk '03 I / Re:"Eye of the Devil" and Dark Shadows
« on: June 18, 2003, 02:32:47 AM »
I've just received a used copy of the original book from the 1960s on which the movie was based.  Fairly easy to find inexpensive paperback versions; the title is "Day of the Arrow."

To my horror, the book seems to be marketed as a "lady's romance" novel -- complete with a reference on the back cover to the effect that it's "in the manner of Victoria Holt"!!   :P  Also an intriguing reference on the back saying that the story deals with "witches and homosexuals"!! Umm, O.K. ...

I'm quite curious to see whether the book bears any relation to the movie that followed ...



993
Sounds like a great theatre experience, Gerard!  I can believe that that role would be very difficult to play.  I think both Peter Wyngarde ("The Innocents") and Christopher Guard ("The Haunting of Helen Walker") did superb jobs with it.

The first time I saw "The Innocents" I thought it was good but I was ever so slightly disappointed because I knew the book so well and wondered why so many details had been changed, rearranged, or invented for the film.  I thought it was very well done, but departed too much from Henry James.

Having viewed it a second time this past weekend, I must say I was far more impressed overall ... perhaps in part because a few more years have passed since I last read the book and I'm more distant from it now; but perhaps I'm also more open now to the idea of creating a filmic equivalent -- but not a duplicate -- interpreting the story using a completely different medium.  I see the movie as rather a meditation on the novella, a response to the text rather than a scene-by-scene rendering of the text.

I didn't remember that "The Innocents" had been a play (though you may have mentioned this last time around, Gerard ...).  I wonder if the play could have been based upon the film script rather than the other way around.  Truman Capote was the primary author of the film script.

Do you happen to know if the play script is still available?  It's been years since I've used the Dramatists Play Service and am not sure how to look it up.


994
I don't know if anyone gets the "FXM" network -- I know I don't.

If you do, you'll have the rare opportunity to view the 1961 classic "The Innocents" with Deborah Kerr.  For as long as I've had cable and learned about this movie via this forum, the movie has not aired on any station I get.  Fortunately, I purchased the video, but it is a pan and scan version which severely cuts off some of the scenes.  For example, in one scene, you see one person's nose on one side of the screen and the other person's nose on the other side of the screen.

If anyone watches the FXM showing, I would be interested to hear whether it was presented in wide-screen format.  If so, I envy you -- and advise you to tape it.  According to a multitude of comments on amazon and imdb.com, the widescreen version is practically mandatory for this movie.

Interesting that this should air just when a review of Dan Curtis's "The Turn of the Screw" has appeared on this forum (thanks, Midnite -- haven't had a chance to read it yet though).

"The Innocents" is a filmic "equivalent" of the Henry James ghost novella "The Turn of the Screw" which inspired a couple of the storylines on DS where the children are haunted by the ghosts of Quentin and Beth, for example (and I think a later storyline, too ... ).

I call the movie an "equivalent" or an interpretation since it follows the original rather loosely.  Much closer versions have been made that were also excellent, namely "The Haunting of Helen Walker" for NBC-TV and "The Turn of the Screw" for BBC - PBS.

The movie could be described, I think, as visual poetry with its wealth of nuance and visual symbolism.  The reading of the story is heavy on the psychological overtones but still leaves the essential ambiguity of the original novella.

Sadly, like "The Eye of the Devil" discussed recently, "The Innocents" is not available on DVD.

995
Current Talk '03 I / Re:Sci Fi's trashy DS broadcasts
« on: June 13, 2003, 11:53:02 PM »
I haven't noticed the visual quality being different, but when I put in one of my tapes from the last round to check an episode I missed not long ago, I noticed that the loud HISSSSS throughout the broadcast from the last time was GONE during the more recent broadcast.

I don't think this was a problem with my videocassette, either.

Someone on the forum wrote about some efforts that had been made to remove this hiss, I think.

There seems to be a dramatic improvement ... now that I already taped the entire series during the last SciFi run!   ::)



996
Current Talk '03 I / Re:OT - Re:"Eye of the Devil"
« on: June 13, 2003, 01:48:45 AM »
That was her voice.
...

She really was very good, and that wasn't dubbed.  It'd be a shame if you have to view the video without sound.

I was able to view most of the clip on another computer, although without sound, unfortunately.  So I appreciate your responding with this information!  :)


Quote
Tell me when RFTA airs on TMC and I'll tape it for you. :D

They seem to have removed "Return from the Ashes" from their database.   :'(   :'(



Gothick wrote:

Quote
I used to have a tape of it (from an AMC showing of many years ago, back when they aired movies without commercial interruption)

I'm glad I was able to tape as many movies as I have before AMC changed their format.  Most of their movies now run well over two hours because of all the commercials, meaning that I can't tape something I really want in SP on a standard 2-hour video cassette.  (For some reason those 8-hr EP videocassettes don't seem to be sold much anymore -- that's what ALL of my DS is on!)


Gothick continued:
Quote
It is really a mood piece that evokes the inner power that lives within the Earth, and how people in traditional communities hold that power and the sacrifices they make to honor that strength and to allow their communities to survive.


Very interesting commentary.



997
Current Talk '03 I / Re:"Eye of the Devil" and Dark Shadows
« on: June 12, 2003, 12:51:36 AM »

Unfortunately I can't get TCM (blasted Comcast!), but I found a few nuggets on their website.  I hope I'm not crossing into Announcements/Events territory, but if you have Real Player or Windows Media you can watch (URL) or a groovy (and tragic when you consider what happened to that beautiful girl, and funny-- check out her voice coach!) featurette about the making of the movie that's appropriately called (URL).  "I can't see myself doing Shakespeare," snort.   Enjoy!

Midnite (if you read this) ... thanks for the link; I'm not able to play the video on this computer but I may try another computer tomorrow night (in a different lab).  In any event, it won't have sound, though, so could you tell me:  Was that really Sharon Tate's voice in "Eye of the Devil"?  The smoky, silky quality of her voice (and accent) greatly enhanced the effectiveness of her performance, but it looked to me as though she was dubbed.  I will be very impressed with Ms. Tate if that was in fact her own voice.  (It's also to her credit, IMO, that I never thought once while viewing the movie "Oh, that's Sharon Tate -- what a terrible fate she had.")

If you get TMC, I'd gladly "swap" TCM access once in a while  :D  because I know TMC sometimes airs "Return from the Ashes" -- a memorable 60s flick from the same director, which sadly is not on video or DVD.

Patti, a poster on the imdb said "Eye of the Devil" wasn't available on video or DVD, but I haven't checked into this myself yet.

Speaking of the title of the movie, I may have been too hard on a commentator I referred to above, since the title does suggest that the movie has something to do with Satanism.  Pagan rituals, yes, but not Satan.  (In the movie, Alain Montfaucon says the town is a center of "heresy" -- which is interesting, since the heretical Cathar sect was active in France in the Middle Ages.)  The title of the movie was actually "13" up until its release, when studio execs changed it.  "Eye of the Devil" is not a very accurate title.  Also, according to Leonard Maltin, continuity errors resulted from last-minute studio-mandated cuts.  Sound familiar?   ::)

998
Current Talk '03 I / Re:"Eye of the Devil" and Dark Shadows
« on: June 11, 2003, 03:22:17 AM »
I wasn't familiar with the announcement board until just recently, Cassandra Blair -- so I wonder what I may have missed out on this past year ...

 :'(

If "Eye of the Devil" airs again, I'll post a notice (and try to remember you in particular!)  :D  But I have been watching the TV listings for at least two years and this is the first it has aired in that time that I know of.

You're right -- many of the elements I mention are "stock" elements of the dark old house genre, so DC & Co. didn't necessarily borrow from this movie -- except for the final scene, which is too similar to the ending of "Night of Dark Shadows" to be coincidence.  While such borrowings and influences are often subconscious on the part of a writer, "Eye of the Devil" came out in 1967, which wasn't many years before "Night of Dark Shadows."

The novel on which it was based, "Day of the Arrow," was published in 1964, so I feel sure that "The Wicker Man" owes a major debt to it (either the novel or the movie).  (A blatant lifting was the brief image of an "all-seeing" eye.)

One other motif in common with DS was hypnotism -- there was an undercurrent of trancelike states in the movie, as well as narcotic-induced states from belladonna ...

If anyone reading this is more "pagan literate" than I am, I'd be curious to know if the ritual of this movie was based on anything historically accurate.  It involved 12 men dancing around a 13th man in the center of the circle -- the one who was marked for sacrifice.

I'm surprised by the rather lukewarm ratings many people (on the Internet) seem to give this film, but I also take exception to many of their comments.  For example, one reviewer says that "Satanism" and vineyards (the movie is set in the Bordeaux region of France) don't mix.  First off, the movie is NOT about Satanism, but paganism -- but even if it were, who's to say "they don't mix"?  Others criticize the film for having too much dialogue -- it's true, this is a movie that demands one's careful attention both visually and aurally ...

I would recommend it to those who liked "The Innocents."



999
Current Talk '03 I / "Eye of the Devil" and Dark Shadows
« on: June 10, 2003, 03:27:01 AM »
As I posted on the announcement board, the eerie thriller "Eye of the Devil" with Deborah Kerr and David Niven aired on TCM last Friday.  I had only seen the last 45 minutes or so of the movie some years ago, was fascinated by it, and then it was about two more years before I finally discovered the title of the movie, and have been watching for it the past two or three years!

The long wait did not disappoint -- in fact I even viewed my tape of the movie twice.  This is a very masterful, subtle, artistically produced film that some have compared to "The Haunting" in its tone ... but I much prefer "Eye of the Devil"!  The movie also precedes "The Wicker Man" with the theme of pagan sacrifice, here in a festival called "Les Treize Jours."

What is of interest here are some of the similarities I noted with Dark Shadows.  For example:

Most of the film is set in the ancestral home of the main characters; ancestral portraits play an important function in the mystery.

(Note:  The summary on imdb.com erroneously says the early scenes take place in London.  They do not; the setting and filming was Paris for the opening scenes.)

Madness is passed down to the male heirs from generation to generation.  I'm a bit hazy on this, but doesn't this function in the 1841 storyline?  (As well as in the movie version "The Fall of the House of Usher".)

There's a tower of course, and it's later revealed that someone is living in "the tower room" ...

One of the themes is the corruption of a child by evil (which DS probably borrowed from "The Turn of the Screw.")

Finally, the strongest resemblance -- which I do NOT think coincidental -- is the final scene, when Deborah Kerr and her children are about to leave the chateau.  They are in the car -- and the little boy "remembers" he forgot something and runs back inside.  I immediately thought of the ending of "Night of Dark Shadows."




1000
I think the description of this section of the board means that we can post off-topic things (like our favorite recipes, poetry, etc. ??  ;) ) -- as long as we think they're of interest to people who like Dark Shadows ...

I'm so excited about a movie that airs tomorrow at noon (Central Time) on TCM, "Eye of the Devil."  I saw the last 45 minutes of it a few years ago and have been anxious to catch the entire movie ever since.  Taping it while I'm at work will mean I'll have to sacrifice taping DS tomorrow morning (since I want the movie on a separate tape, in SP) ...

I hope imdb.com won't mind my copying this summary:

"Vineyard owner marquis Philippe de Montfaucon is called back to his castle Bellenac because of another dry season. He asks his wife and children to remain in London, but they still come after him. His wife Catherine de Montfaucon soon discovers that her husband is acting mysteriously and that his employees are following old pagan rituals that call for the life of the marquis himself to save the crops." -- imdb.com  Summary of "Eye of the Devil"

This sounds a little bit like "The Wicker Man," which was discussed on this forum not long ago, and one commentator on imdb.com felt that the film must have influenced Polanski's "Rosemary's Baby."

I didn't know until I checked imdb.com just a few minutes ago that the director, J. Lee Thompson, also directed what may be my favorite movie from the 1960s:  "Return from the Ashes" (which I would kill to have on videotape -- it has never aired on cable since I got cable -- except on The Movie Channel, I think it is, which I don't get!  :'( )

The cast includes Deborah Kerr ("The Innocents"); also, I was excited to see listed in the cast Flora Robson (the elderly Miss Pross in my favorite version of "A Tale of Two Cities," with Chris Sarandon, Peter Cushing, Billie Whitelaw), and also the playwright and actor Emlyn Williams ("Night Must Fall" -- which I taped only yesterday, sacrificing another day of DS! -- and which I've been waiting to see ever since my old theater days some years ago!).

Luciaphil says it's good, too.   :)

1001
Current Talk '03 I / Re:The previously out-of-order episodes
« on: June 06, 2003, 12:21:45 AM »
I wish someone had announced this just before these episodes were shown ... I knew it was coming up and I would have made a corrected, permanent tape to replace mine from the last SciFi run.   :(

Then again, these weren't the greatest episodes, were they?   ::)

Still, for those of us who are obsessive about these things ...




1002
Current Talk '03 I / Re:Breakneck Pacing
« on: June 06, 2003, 12:08:33 AM »
But you have to remember, Vlad, that you came to DS in the days of VCRs - not in the days when on Friday afternoons, after you had to meet your mom when she got out of work so you could get a ride home from school, you had to constantly pester her to get the grocery shopping done quickly so you could get home to see DS. And more often than not, I ended up missing parts if not some entire episodes. I'm quite sure I was not alone in that - and the ONLY way for us to find out what had happened was if one of our friends had seen what we'd missed. ;)

You have a good point.  We do have all the episodes available to us now, which wasn't the case then.  I hadn't considered how the luxury of VCRs has made this possible.

I seem to remember missing one or two episodes during these "fast-paced" sequences (of 1840, etc.) during SciFi's last airing (hopefully I have everything on tape  :) ) and really didn't feel lost; but perhaps there were a handful of particular episodes that, if missed, would have left the viewer in the dark.

 ^-^


1003
Current Talk '03 I / Re:Breakneck Pacing
« on: June 04, 2003, 01:02:31 AM »
Yeah, there's nothing wrong with telling a story with pace, but it shouldn't be done at the expense of clarity, which is what increasingly happened on DS.  If an audience member is left without a clue from missing a couple of episodes, that's bad storytelling.

This point is frequently made, and I personally think it's a bit exaggerated.


1004
Current Talk '03 I / Re:Breakneck Pacing
« on: June 04, 2003, 12:57:07 AM »
The breakneck pacing, where if one missed even one episode, one might have missed a plot point that might never actually be explained again, didn't really take shape with a vengeance until the last year of DS - a point which will begin soon after the complete shift of focus to 1970PT.

Now you'll really think I'm the devil's advocate   >:D  ...

but to tell the truth, when I heard that this was the case during the last SciFi run, I thought that sounded (and was!) terribly exciting!  How rich and novel for a daily serial program to break with tradition -- break the mold -- and go its own way at breakneck speed.

(I don't really recall 1970PT having a breakneck pace, but I suppose the show might have during 1840.)

I found it exhilirating trying to keep up -- and the pace made sure I didn't miss an episode!

1005
I've seen this listed in the past, too, and was always curious what it might be about.

Thanks for the rundown -- guess I'll skip it!   ;D