I like what loril54 had to say:
i hope the movie isn't campy, and I hope that they do it right.
These are real concerns I have, too, and I'm glad to see that they've been raised by a couple of people in this discussion. Personally, neither the director or actor are "right" for me ... but millions disagree ...
Because the show ended in the past, everyone can take it forward in the present.
That's an intriguing idea. Doing something unique with the material could raise the film above the humdrum, same-old, "it's been done" syndrome. Phil's concept is certainly interesting although not necessarily what I would want to see, either.
Everyone has things that they have conflicts about, in many different area's.
When I was new to DS on the web many years ago, I read an article written with great feeling and earnestness about how DS was a metaphor for living in an alcoholic family. While I think there may be some subtle "homosexual subtext" in a few scenes with Willie and Jason McGuire, as well as Aristede and Petofi, I think a broader theme of the show is family secrets - whatever they may be.
I have been watching Collection 1 over the past few weeks and while Mr. Frid's nervousness was evident from time to time at first (just as it was with KLS and any number of other actors on the show), it wasn't as apparent for as long as Mr. Frid seemed to think it was - for an entire year! Poor man, I hope he didn't really mean it, because he certainly came into his own as a powerful presence at the point I'm viewing now, which is Vicki's disappearance from the hospital, soon to be followed by Barnabas' attempts to form her into a new Josette. I think Mr. Frid was very humbly overstating the case of his own nervousness (at least how visible it was) ... and it's a comment that I feel has been given too much ink. Unfortunately, when those unfamiliar with the show see remarks like this recast in print, it's all too easy for them to dismiss DS as laughable and bad.