Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Philippe Cordier

1231
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Victoria Winters' Parents
« on: October 01, 2002, 05:09:18 AM »
Now that Victoria Winters has left Collinwood, Collinsport, and the Dark Shadows story, it may be an appropriate time to re-examine the central mystery about her:  Who were her parents, and what was her connection with the Collins family?  Why did Elizabeth Collins Stoddard provide Victoria with a position at Collinwood, and why did she deny there was any particular meaning in her having done so to Roger, Vicki, and everyone else?

I apologize if I've somehow missed any recent threads dealing with this topic, but I haven't seen any direct discussion of this for some time.

I myself have vacillated on the solution to this mystery.  During my first viewing of the series when Sci-Fi began airing DS about four years ago beginning with the Laura the Phoenix storyline, I saw little evidence for Elizabeth being Vicki's mother, as has often been suggested.  Continuing to watch the show, the alternate possibility that Paul Stoddard was Vicki's father resulting from an affair seemed a much more likely and appealing possibility.

I later rethought this position when I saw the early episodes for the first time.  There seemed to be hints that Elizabeth had a guilty conscience with respect to Vicki -- she obviously knew more than she was telling about Vicki's history and had a particular purpose in bringing her to Collinwood.  At about that time, I saw an interview on TV with the adopted daughter of an actress who later discovered that her adoptive mother was actually her real mother, but I don't believe she ever confronted her mother with this information, and her mother (the famous actress) continued the charade.  (I can't remember any more who this actress was, but apparently this was an out-of-wedlock birth perhaps in the 1940s.)  This made me consider that something like that really could happen, that the psychology behind the mother's motives was realistic, though perhaps difficult to understand today.  Society has changed, sometimes for the better, in the past few decades.

Still, did anyone really get any hint when Vicki disappeared into the past that Elizabeth was truly watching her daughter dissolve before her eyes?  Any hints about such a relationship seem to have dropped by the wayside long ago.

In the series' early episodes, there seemed to be an effort to draw attention to the physical similarities between Elizabeth and Victoria.

One complication was the Betty Hanscomb portrait or drawing.  Although some (perhaps it was SheilaMarch) have theorized that this was actually a portrait of Elizabeth ("Betty") being a nickname, I am doubtful of that possibility.  It was established that there was a "B. Hanscomb" employed as a butler at Collinwood 20 - 25 years earlier.  I believe there was mention that he had a daughter, although I'm not 100 percent certain about this; however, it is a logical inference.  Sam Evans described Betty to Vicki as a local girl who had left town about 25 year earlier and died shortly after.

In keeping with the Gothic novel tradition (including Dickens, et al.), as well as common circumstances during the mid 20th century, this was almost certainly an implication that poor Betty had gotten pregnant and left town to have her illegitimate baby.

What interest would Elizabeth have in bringing the illegitimate daughter of a Collins butler to work at Collinwood so many years later?  And why would Elizabeth apparently have provided financial support to Vicki via the Garner law firm over the years?

It seem inconceivable that a young woman of Elizabeth Collins' status could have been pregnant and given birth without anyone knowing at the time -- and then have left the baby in a basket outside an orphanage.  No, it's far more likely that these would have been the actions of a much poorer girl with few connections -- someone like Betty Hanscombe, whose portrait shows her as almost a dead-ringer for Victoria Winters.

Elizabeth, it is to be noted, denied seeing any resemblance between the portrait and Victoria.  It is probable that she has an invested interest in keeping the truth of Vicki's parents from her.

That truth -- which was postulated by "Bob" on the VantageNet forum in July 2001 (I'm guessing this was Bob the Bartender, unless there was another Bob posting at that time whom I don't recall) -- was that Elizabeth was covering for another member of the Collins family:  her father, Jamison Collins.

Bob suggested that Jamison had a dalliance with his butler's daughter, and Elizabeth stepped in to help the girl when she (sometime later, in my opinion) learned what had happened.  Vicki, then, would be Elizabeth (and Roger's) half-sister -- hence Elizabeth's emotional connection and clandestine support.  In those days, few people, especially those of the Collins family's status -- would have been comfortable acknowledging an illegitimate half-sibling.  Yet we know that Elizabeth is a good, caring woman (witness her tender feelings toward David throughout the series, to Amy, etc.).  Her heart goes out to Vicki, but the emotional bond is not as strong as it would be had Vicki been a full sister or her own daughter.

This hypothesis also fits with what we later learn about Paul Stoddard, namely that Carolyn was his first-born child, whom he made a bargain over with "Mr. Best" (Death, personified).

This theory accounts for Vicki's resemblance to Elizabeth and also, very interestingly, makes her a Collins.

I believe Bob's theory resolves the mystery most satisfactorily and satisfyingly.  I give Bob the credit for supplying the outlines of this theory, which I have further fleshed out.  I would be interested in knowing if this was Bob's original idea or if he was drawing on someone else's previous suggestions.

I have identified four potential objections to this theory, none of which present insurmountable obstacles, in my opinion:

1.  Shadows on the Wall, the "story bible" for the series, states that Paul Stoddard is Victoria Winter's father, if memory serves correct.  I do find this an attractive possibility, but we should remember that a number of substantive changes and departures were made from this story bible as the series unfolded.  (For example, Roger was to be wicked and fall off Widow's hill very early on.)

2.  Joan Bennett's personal belief/testimony.  Miss Bennett apparently stated at a DS festival that she believed Elizabeth was Victoria's mother.  If Bennett acted under this assumption in giving an added layer of emotional depth to her performance (and I believe she did, at least early on), that still doesn't mean that she was in-the-know herself as to the solution to the mystery, just that this was a personal choice she made as an actor.

3.  Sam Evan's statement that he had painted Betty Hanscomb's portrait 25 years earlier, and that Betty had died a year or so later.  The problem this raises is that this would mean that Betty died at least a couple of years before Victoria was born.  It's possible that Sam was mistaken, and gave "25 years ago" as a rough estimate as to when the portrait was done.  I think there is a more likely and interesting possibility, though.  I think he was deliberately concealing the actual date and time frame from Vicki.  Sam most likely wished to "protect" Vicki from learning too much -- from concluding, as he obviously suspected, that Betty Hanscomb was Victoria's mother and that the Collins family was somehow involved.  Thirty-odd years ago, illegitimate births were still hushed up, especially in small towns, considered shameful by many, and Sam would hardly have felt it was his place to reveal his suspicions to Vicki.  So he throws her off the trail by padding the time frame by a year or two.

Significantly, Elizabeth does not tell Vicki, when confronted with the Betty Hansomb/portrait evidence that Betty had died three or four years before Vicki was born (she would know Vicki's age, of course).  Had this been the case, though, Elizabeth would almost certainly have said so.  Though she denied a resemblance between Betty's likeness and Vicki, she hadn't apparently felt comfortable with lying about factual matters that Vicki might someday check into, such as the date of Betty's death.

She would, however, wish to discourage Vicki from making any connection between Betty Hanscomb and the Collins family, and hence deny the physical resemblance.

4.  Finally, Dreams of the Dark.  This novel was sanctioned by DCP and reveals Elizabeth to have been Vicki's mother.  Although I have a great deal of positive things to say about this book, I have to say I will take issue with it on this one point.  The clues suggested in a 30-year-old daily drama were obviously complicated and not likely to be fresh in the minds of readers in 1999 or so, nor would many of today's readers be expected to be concerned with the minutiae of the matter.  It's obviously more emotionally powerful to have a simplified solution at the end of Dreams of the Dark that fits with many of the hints and suspicions some viewers would vaguely have remembered.  But remember that the actual solution isn't likely to have been the most obvious one -- the writers at the time most likely had a "twist" in mind, but sadly the entire mystery was completely dropped before this was revealed.

Although the scene in DOD where this was revealed was extremely well-executed, one aspect of it did not ring true for me -- and that was Elizabeth's apparent habitual occult ritual of protection for Vicki.  There is never any indication in the series that Elizabeth would have employed the occult, especially before the appearance of Barnabas on the scene.  Even then, Elizabeth voiced strong objections and even fear about the initial seances.  What we do see with respect to Elizabeth throughout the entire series is that she refers to prayer at times of distress.  It is more likely that Elizabeth's beliefs and practices fell within the conventional confines of a matron of a family steeped in tradition, and that if she had wished for the protection of Victoria from the time of her birth onward, she would have relied on the means most familiar to her with which she was comfortable -- prayer, not the practice of occult rituals.

1232
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Re: Movies airing on TCM, 10/04
« on: September 26, 2002, 05:21:35 AM »
My local TV schedule shows the running time for "House of Dark Shadows" at 105 minutes.  It also shows 105 minutes for "Night of Dark Shadows."  Could it be that TCM will be showing restored versions of these films?

It seems to me that when the two DS movies aired in the past, it was on AMC, not TCM, but I may be mistaken about that.

Maybe we should all tape the movies -- just in case they've come up with extended versions!  The movie channels sometimes come up with some surprises -- witness the recent airing of "Frankenstein: The True Story" on AMC instead of the advertised Dan Curtis version -- this three-hour version co-scripted by Christopher Isherwood is not only one of the highest rated versions of Frankenstein, but scores of people had been dying to see the complete, uncut 300-minute version ever since it first aired in the early 1970s -- only a savagely cut version was ever released on video (like, 45 minutes worth of cuts).  So the surprise came somewhat at the expesne of those wanting to see the Dan Curtis version, but as a long-awaited moment for many others who had all but given up hope of ever seeing the extended version of this made-for-TV film.  Personally, I didn't find "Frankenstein: The True Story" to relate all that much to the Mary Shelley novel, but the cast (James Mason, Agnes Moorhead, Leonard Whiting, Michael Sarrazin, Sir Ralph Richardson, et al.) and production values definitely made this rare showing an event.

Maybe we'll be similarly surprised with the upcoming airings of HODS and NODS!


1233
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Original Intent?
« on: September 21, 2002, 09:25:17 PM »
Quote
I wish 1897 was written the way 1795 was...the writers had that storyline clear and mapped out.


1897 has some of the best moments of the show, but the saga became too sprawling, IMO.

The 1840 storyline has a stronger inner unity holding everything together, similar in that respect to 1795.  

1840 was also the most multilayered and complex storyline, so I'm willing to forgive the false starts that Gothick mentions as setting up that storyline.  (I actually don't remember what those inconsistencies were, but perhaps they'll be more noticeable upon a second viewing.)

I think there was a lot of brilliance with the way much of 1897 worked out, with the werewolf curse for example.

1234
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Original Intent?
« on: September 20, 2002, 06:57:29 AM »
Quote
In the beginning of 1897, it appears that Edward is married to Jenny and had her locked away in the tower.  She even tries to kill him.  DC must have then been able to get Diana Millay back on the show, so the writers changed Edward's wife to Laura.  The original intent for 1897 had probably been changed many times, especially when the story got under way.

DC stated 1897 was to run for three months originally.  it was most likely a simple planned story then.  Quentin kills a relative of Magda, she places the werewolf curse on him.  As a werewolf, Quentin kills Beth. Q is found out by Judith and Edward.  One of them shoot him and he dies in the room.  They seal up the room to prevent anyone from discovering Q's secret and state he went to France to live.

This is fascinating, JoeyTrom!  I had never heard any of these details, other than having read that the 1897 storyline had been extended a couple of times (which seemed pretty obvious just watching it).

What you've outlined sounds like a nice, compact story -- in some ways I think I would have preferred it to some of the extravagances we were entertained with as aspects of the story line became more and more outlandish.

And to think I had praised the writers to no end for their brilliant plotting, thinking that they knew already at this point that

SPOILER

the skeleton wasn't Quentin's but that of Judith's ... husband (won't spoil by giving the name).

Your scenario makes much more sense than thinking that nearly everything in 1897 had been mapped out at this point.  There were even specific lines indicating that the skeleton WAS Quentin's, which doesn't jive with what we learn later.

On the other hand, they must have had some very specific ideas such as the family connections between the Jennings and the Collinses, etc., since both Chris Jennings and Quentin were afflicted with the werewolf curse.

Still, it sounds like the writers were writing by the seat of their pants ... no small talent, either.

1235
Current Talk '02 II / My Dark Shadows "Dream" Theory
« on: September 20, 2002, 05:49:04 AM »
This is offered in a somewhat lighthearted spirit, though with the idea of "what if ..."

Unfortunately, I don't have my notes that I jotted down about this with me but I wanted to post this at the appropriate time in the series -- Victoria's return to the past.

My theory is this:  The entire series up to this point has actually been the dream of Victoria Winters!

At this point in my scenario, Victoria Winters awakens -- and she's on the train to Collinsport, where she is to be governess at Collinwood.

She is a young girl full of dreams and imagination and a taste for Gothic novels ...

As an alternative to this theory, Victoria Winters has already arrived at Collinwood, and is the governess to David.  Barnabas Collins, a cousin from England has arrived.  And he really IS a cousin from England, except in Victoria's overwrought romantic imagination ... She's never imprisoned by the handyman ... there is no ghost of Josette except in her imagination.  I think it could be fascinating to work out all of the details ...

And at the current juncture in the series, Victoria Winters has left to return to New York, never finding out any information about her past.  At this point, from now until the end of the series, all that happens is in the dreams and reveries of the lonely Collins matriarch, Elizabeth Collins Stoddard ...

1236
Current Talk '02 II / Joel Crothers - DS's Most Underrated Actor?
« on: September 20, 2002, 05:40:52 AM »
I've commented over the years on how natural a performer Joel Crothers is.  Partly his naturalness may be dictated by his regular-guy character, Joe Haskell.  But with some acting experience myself, I know it isn't as easy as it looks to appear natural, at ease, comfortable -- it can be easier to be stagey and overly dramatic (Betsy Durban's over-emoting, anyone? ;) )

He and KLS are such comparable performers -- there is such an ease to their individual performances and the way they work with one another -- you don't even notice most of the time that they ARE acting (now compare that with Humbert Allen Astredo, who never appears natural or believable, IMO, at least not as Nicholas Blair ... though I do admit the dictates of the roles are quite different).

When Joe was panting and out of breath, lying on the sofa in the drawing room at Collinwood, he was BELIEVABLE.  Again, a useful comparison -- or contrast, I should say -- would be the Jeb Hawkes actor (sorry, I'm spacing out on the name) -- imagine him doing the same scene!  Yikes!!

The only times I didn't quite like Crothers was when we seemed to have been directed to be overly hysterical, as with some of his latter scenes in 1795.

I think his performances are sometimes overlooked in favor of the more theatrical (though superb) work of actors like Frid and Thayer David.


1237
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Mrs. Findlay Has Died...but...
« on: September 20, 2002, 05:28:29 AM »
Not sure if anyone commented on this elsewhere, but it was nice to see a skilled actress in the role of Madame Findley.


1238
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Re: Post Fest...One Year Ago Today
« on: September 20, 2002, 05:24:51 AM »
Quote
   I just sent it to you, Vam.

Carol,

That was SO thoughtful of you.  I hope I didn't sound too whiny in my post.

I'm always short of time in the computer lab and can't get everything done I'd like too in the short time I have to be here.

I'll print out the article to read at home.

Again, thanks for taking the time and effort of doing this.

1239
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Time discrepancy
« on: September 20, 2002, 05:18:00 AM »
Although I usually watch the episodes closely (the Adam - Nicholas Blair ones excepted), I often find the chronology of events rather confusing -- but figure that I'm probably just not paying close enough attention.  Glad to find out that the problem isn't me!

Sometimes I'm tempted to go back and replay part of an episode to find out what time it's supposed to be, but I usually don't take the time to do so.

P.S.  How many nights (or weeks?) does the full moon last, anyway?!?

1240
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Re: Post Fest...One Year Ago Today
« on: September 19, 2002, 05:22:54 AM »
Quote

This article is just devastating.  Like many others, until recently, I had always assumed there had been ample time for everyone at the Marriott to get out safely.  Obviously not the case.  It's easy to understand how the Tall Ships bar was the only escape route.


I am anxious to read this article, but at the moment don't have time to go through the registration process -- complicated by the fact that I know I've registered with the NYTimes at least twice before, but have no idea now what my password and/or other information might have been.  I really, really hate that system!

Quote
Not long ago I was searching through my wallet for something and came across this.  I can't find the words to express how I felt.  All I can say is, I had to run to the bathroom.



I still have my room key for the WTC Marriott.  I had locked myself out on my last day there, Monday after the festival, and had to get a new key.

The Marriott employee told me I could keep the original key (which I found in my room) as a souvenir.

1241
Current Talk '02 II / "Return to Collinwood"
« on: September 15, 2002, 12:33:22 AM »
... with the new shift in storyline.

That's how I feel now that the Adam storyline seems to be over (and I celebrate the departure of Nicholas Blair as well!).  Not too much worthwhile emerged from the Adam "experiment," IMO, although there were some good moments, of course.  We came to know Professor Stokes better; there were some frightening moments with Maggie's memory returning and her and Joe's realization that they were both vampire victims.

I'd actually like to pretend the whole Adam business never happened.  Although, I think the idea of Barnabas having a perpetual "double"/variation on the doppleganger idea is interesting, I still didn't cotton to this storyline.  Did the PTB really think viewers wanted to watch Adam pout endlessly for week after week?  Talk about someone having a chip on their shoulder!

With the haunting of Quentin and the children exploring the closed off rooms, I've been feeling once again that I'd love to live at Collinwood.  I realized I haven't felt that way since the pre-Adam days.

I also prefer the entire werewolf concept, at least as it was executed on DS, to the Frankenstein monster theme (this despite my appreciation for the novel "Frankenstein.").

Random thoughts ...

That skeleton was pretty creepy looking -- it wasn't the "bleached white" type you find in biology classrooms.  This one looked like it might have some mumified flesh still attached.  Shades of "Psycho" when that chair turned around!  No wonder they decided to bury it!

Funny no one else ever noticed the false wall in the storage room or wondered what room was behind the windows to Quentin's room when looking from outside.

Which brings me to ...

SPOILER

Whomever that skeleton belonged to ... assuming it was someone who was walled up in that room ... couldn't they have gotten out a window?  That wall didn't seem too sturdy either!

Slight discrepancy in Amy and David's story ... everyone seems to have forgotten the storm when Amy and David were supposedly outside seeing the sunrise ...

Wasn't Vicki's wedding anticlimactic ... after all the false starts?  Seems her honeymoon may have been rather "anticlimactic" too ;)

The intertwining of the werewolf story with the ghost of Quentin will prove one of the best stories DS did ... I envy any newbies who might be seeing this for the first time ...

I'm excited, too, because, in two weeks, I'll have about six weeks of episodes (well into November) that I've never seen ... the leadup to 1897 ...

1242
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Re: Post Fest...One Year Ago Today
« on: September 15, 2002, 12:14:15 AM »
Quote
I'm thought i read that all the Marriott staff and quests were later accounted for but could be wrong.

Jennifer, I think that was the information that was given out at first.  However, it proved to be inaccurate.  I don't remember exact figures, but I know that more than one Marriott staff member was killed and several guests who remained in their rooms.

Watching some of the coverage on CNN on Wednesday, I noticed on the crawl at the bottom of the screen of the names who died, one was a Marriott staff member, general manager of something, but I didn't catch the full information.

1243
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Re: Post Fest...One Year Ago Today
« on: September 13, 2002, 05:34:59 AM »
I only have a moment to post, but I was thinking of you, Castlebee, and everyone else I met at the Festival in New York in 2001, over the past few days.

My heart felt so heavy all day yesterday, I couldn't even bring myself to do something so "frivolous" as watch DS or check the message board ... until late at night, I finally had to take my mind off the events of 9-11 and capitulated to watching the day's DS eps.

I remember Ben remarking to me about the security levels at the Marriott.  I didn't think much about it as they had the same type of security where I had been working for the previous couple of years ...

I remember the wonderful, friendly staff at the Marriott and the security guards at the two towers ...

Can't believe it's really gone, and some of the people we saw are probably dead.

Now that the first anniversary is over, it seems like a milestone, and we know that time heals.

-Vlad

1244
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Hell's Waiting Room.........
« on: September 06, 2002, 01:11:46 AM »
Quote
When I first saw this episode back in 1968, I felt fear--it looked exactly the way I always pictured hell.

I can't even begin to imagine how scary that scene in "Hell" would have seemed had I seen it back in 1968!


1245
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Lyndhurst Featured on A&E
« on: September 04, 2002, 05:05:15 AM »
The Lyndhurst mansion was profiled in a 20-minute segment on "Mansions, Monuments, and Masterpieces" on A&E last Friday night.

The history was given, especially about its occupant the evil robber baron Gould.

Many beautiful shots both interior, exterior, the grounds, history of the Conservatory/greenhouse ...

It was fascinating.

The program was to re-aire about 4 a.m. but I forgot to set my VCR to tape it.