Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Philippe Cordier

1441
Current Talk '02 I / Re: 1795 as a Greek Tragedy
« on: March 22, 2002, 06:22:47 AM »
Continued from previous ...

I ran out of time last night, but am switching emphasis here, anyway.  These comments are addressed specifically to Luciaphil, if she should read this.

Luciaphil, I was completely unaware of the movies you referred to, "The Thing that Couldn't Die" and "The Beast with Five Fingers," and their connection with 1840 and 1897, respectively (as I gather after reading movie descriptions in Leonard Maltin's video bible).

Aaargghh!!  Why didn't someone clue me into the 1840 connection before -- my favorite storyline?   ::)  Have you mentioned these movies before?  I haven't seen them referred to in any DS sources I've read.

Well, I do greatly appreciate the lead at this point, especially before I spent too many manhours researching various "talking head" legends dating back to the Middle Ages (at least) that I was engaged in tracking down.  From Maltin's description of "The Thing that Couldn't Die," it does sound like that is the direct inspiration for the head of Judah Zachary.  (Aside:  I note in Maltin that the script was co-written by Dodie Smith -- known to me as the author of a favorite childhood book, the original novel of "The Hundred and One Dalmations.)

And "The Uninvited" -- another movie I only recently have heard of, and which I've been dying to see!  If you have a moment, could you elaborate on what its connection with DS is?

More videos for me to try to track down, it looks like!

Finally, the Roger, Laura, Burke connection with "Wuthering Heights."  This was a new one to me -- it's interesting to think of Devlin as a Heathcliff figure (though I'd have a much harder time seeing Anthony George in this light).  I would have thought this a stretch if you hadn't mentioned that Art Wallace himself brought this up in an interview.

Another example of drawing on archetypes?  Romantic love triangles are as old as the hills ...

P.S.  Thanks to VAM for drawing attention to LParker's comments about Jos. Campbell.   :D




1442
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Barn & Ben: a 1795 highlight
« on: March 22, 2002, 05:53:05 AM »
Raineypark,

Thanks for your kind remarks!  I sometimes worry that I might come across as trying to be a know-it-all, but I guess it comes from having spent six years at two very competitive, cut-throat academic institutions.  And actually, I hoped that my thoughts on Ben and Barnabas, which came from my emotions, might balance my more clinical, intellectual dissection in the "tragic genre" post.  So, I appreciate your response.  Also, since I was laying bare some of my feelings here (and possibly revealing what an oddball I might seem to some!) in this thread.

Regarding "Nicholas Nickleby," I too have the 8-tape set from the Royal Shakespeare Co. production that was produced on Broadway in the early '80s.  Though I haven't watched all of it, I always remembered it from its TV broadcast.  The more recent production was a BBC film version that aired in England last year and for the first time in the U.S. just a couple of months ago on TNT, I believe it was.  This version was beautifully filmed and the actor portraying Smike was especially heartbreaking (not so physically deformed as in the RSC stage version).  You could find out more information about it on imdb.com; it's available on video and DVD (through bn.com, among other sites).  I highly recommend it!

How great to find another Dickens enthusiast!  I'm sure people on this board have had to roll their eyes more than once when I start going on about Dickens time and again ...  But the 1897 storyline does have a Dickensian feel, as well as a very brief borrowing from "Nicholas Nickleby", as you may be aware of (which was called to my attention on this forum the last time 1897 ran on SciFi).

Yes, Dickens is a very heartfelt writer, and I've read that in the Victorian age men weren't ashamed to be brought to tears by the emotions he brought to the forefront ...

And I am so impressed with the quality of thought that went into the writing of the DS episodes we are seeing now and throughout so much of the series ...  the interweaving of Ben's and Barnabas's relationship throughout several different time periods being just one example of how this show is in a class of its own ...

And then whenever something really cheesey happens (severed arms falling off, etc.), I plant my tongue firmly in cheek and remind myself that I DID refer to 1795 as the "Masterpiece Theatre" segment of the series ...

Loved everyone's comments here ... I learned something!

Vlad


1443
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Barn & Ben: a 1795 highlight
« on: March 21, 2002, 06:42:39 AM »
Ben, thanks for posting this thoughtful topic about the relationship between Barnabas and Ben Stokes.  Given the vast differences between them in social status, education, etc., it's all the more remarkable that their friendship continues to grow -- a relationship marked by mutual respect, loyalty, and endurance.

You've touched on a topic that I find very meaningful personally; I'm always drawn by presentations such as what we'll be seeing with Barnabas and Ben; not long ago I found myself moved by the relationship between Nicholas and Smike in the recent production of "Nicholas Nickleby."

Such friendships are seemingly all too rare in real life.  I have literally had people end a friendship because I voted for a different political candidate, for example, and another because I didn't watch the World Series when "we" were in it (I went to browse at Borders Books instead).  Such things are absolutely unforgivable to many -- to me, that would be like my ending a friendship because the other person didn't care for "Dark Shadows."  I'd love for everyone I know to share exactly the same interests, feelings, and beliefs that I do, but that's not realistic.  There are always going to be differences of opinion between people, but it's my conviction that these things are superficial when put into the perspective of what's really important in life.

What the friendhsip between Barnabas and Ben Stokes shows, to me, is that what's important is the relationship -- respect and caring for another human being -- despite differences.  In the end, that's the only thing that truly matters.




1444
Current Talk '02 I / Re: 1795 as a Greek Tragedy?
« on: March 21, 2002, 06:24:31 AM »
Ah, just the sort of topic I like sinking my teeth into!   ;)

It's interesting, I've referred several times in the past to the 1795 storyline as a "tragedy" and to Barnabas as a tragic hero, but I was thinking more along the lines of Shakespearean tragedy and what developed in the English theatre.  All those bodies littering the stage at the end of 1795 looked like the tableau at the end of "Hamlet." :'(

Although it's been nearly 20 years since I studied Greek tragedy (so my memory is somewhat hazy), my impression remains that 1795, with its large cast and expansive plot (and subplots) is much closer to the Shakespearean form.  Greek tragedy by definition (especially as commented on by Aristotle) requires that certain unities (time, place, action) must be observed -- e.g., the entire action must take place within a single day.  Shakespeare, on the other hand, in developing the tragedy for the English stage, did not adhere to the classical model of the Greeks.  What most of us think of as tragedy is probably more in keeping with the heritage of the Elizabethan period.

The central horror of "Medea" is her slaying of her own children to spite Jason -- an act that might give even Angelique pause (though it would be interesting to consider the possibilities!).    [scrdy] I don't doubt that one might see similarities in some of the characters.  My thought would be that that's because DS draws on some of the same archetypal figures found in drama and literature from time immemorial.  ("Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned," etc.)  [evily]

Greek mythology, on the other hand, was definitely borrowed by the DS writers very briefly with the Quentin/Amanda Harris plot, which at the end re-worked the Orpheus/Eurydice in the underworld story.  There may have been other instances that I can't remember offhand.  

Myth in general, a la Joseph Campbell and Jung, is unconsciously present throughout the series, IMO.  (About a year ago, I started an essay on just this theme -- DS and myth -- for a certain DS publication, but I got distracted and my life seems to have been in near-constant disarray since then, and I haven't been able to get back to it.)   :(

So, in sum (though not to presume mine is the final word), I'd say that 1795 resembles a theatrical tragedy, but I wouldn't call it specifically a "Greek tragedy." The series as a whole, as Luciaphil points out, is a melange of genres (horror, mystery, melodrama, and yes even a macabre fairy tale at one point, as I argued during 1970 PT, I think it was ...).  And, my own private theory is that the series taken in its entirety constitutes a grand myth.



1445
Current Talk '02 I / Re: This Old House
« on: March 16, 2002, 03:23:23 AM »
Quote


Since it would be unthinkable for the future lady of the house to be placed in a windowless room, I am going to assume that the windows are supposed to be real


I'm sure you're right about that, Luciaphil (i.e., that Josette's bedroom must have windows); however, I thought that there were windows on the wall to our (viewers') right, on either side of the bed's headboard, perhaps?  It's also possible that there are windows on the "fourth" wall (i.e., the imaginary wall through which we, the audience, views the set/stage).

Any thoughts on that vertical mail chute outside the bedroom designated for Jeremiah at the Great House?  It looked like the type you see in office buildings (though wooden, not glass).

Third, in another thread I mentioned that I COULD see a broad portico, pillars (and, presumably, steps), just outside the door of the Old House.  Eons ago, it was thought that these had "disappeared" after they stopped using the video location footage that was used earlier on in the series.

:D  :D   :D  :D

1446
Current Talk '02 I / Re: This Old House
« on: March 13, 2002, 07:02:28 AM »
Does anyone know what that mail chute thing was just to the left of Jeremiah's room in the Great/New House today?

In Josette's room, I've noticed curtained windows just to the left of the door when you come into the room (just to the right hand side of the door, if you're standing by Josette's bed and facing the hallway).  Do you think these are false curtains for decoration, or is this indeed an outside wall?  The fireplace is to the right, so it could be an outside wall, yet the hallway would seem to extend beyond Josette's room.

Favorite room(s) so far:  Josette's; Naomi and Joshua's.  I remember really liking the study, but can't remember if that's the Old House or New.  ?!?

:)  :)  :)  :)

1447
Testing. 1, 2, 3... / Re: Old and New Smileys
« on: March 12, 2002, 07:01:24 AM »
OHHHH!!!!!

[crazd]

[sun]


1448
Testing. 1, 2, 3... / Re: Old and New Smileys
« on: March 12, 2002, 06:59:47 AM »
Well, I finally found some of them ... [shkdb]

But not all of 'em, like the ones Luciaphil and Castlebee are using ...  [vryangg]


1449
Current Talk '02 I / Re: More 1795 Comments
« on: March 09, 2002, 03:43:12 AM »
An observation made in the episode where "Rev." Trask arrived ...

This was the first time I noticed that you could really see outside the front entrance of the Old House ... maybe it was the camera angle or something ... but anyway, you could see the wide front portico and its pillars beyond the front door.  

In other words, the view DID correspond with the outside shots we have of the old house.  There must be steps going up to the portico in front, just as in the slides!

I'm not sure now if this works from what we saw of Vicky's arrival at the old house in 1795.  Could she have been on a porch?  If not, perhaps she was at a different entrance to the house?

(This topic was discussed way back in a "Missing Stairs" thread -- uncertain of name of thread on old board.)



1450
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Trask's interrogation gets only one star
« on: March 09, 2002, 03:25:52 AM »
Favorite Quote of the day:

"I think it must be religion!"

:D

[shadow=red,left,300]Angelique Bouchard[/shadow]


1451
Current Talk '02 I / :-[Re: kathryn and lara
« on: March 09, 2002, 03:18:42 AM »
And take pictures!  :)

(Be sure your lens cap is off ... I'm still kicking myself from the fest when Lara Parker posed for half a dozen of us after the banquet ... and I later saw that my lens cap had been on the whole time)  :-[



1452
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 I / Re: DS Fest
« on: March 09, 2002, 03:05:04 AM »
Quote
Think positive Vlad. Do hope you are able to go. I remember you since we both were involved with the Costume Gala last year. Remember that character in black with those chains ::)


Oh, VAM, was that you?  Of course I remember you -- you had the best costume disguise of all!  I don't think I ever met you when you weren't wearing the costume, or did I?  You aren't in the photo posted here, are you?  (Thank goodness that photo appears very small on this page -- I didn't find it very flattering of myself, personally speaking, though others may have been happy with it.)  ;D

I did meet Bette who started this thread.
:)




1453
Quote


Many people have brief romantic or sexual flings.  The fact that he is a gentleman and she is a servant probably plays a role.  


I may have been too graphic in my terminology here.  A word more in keeping with the 18th century would probably be "dalliance."   :)

Others on this board might be better able to tell you of the type of woman Barnabas likes ...  ;)



1454
Testing. 1, 2, 3... / Re: Old and New Smileys
« on: March 08, 2002, 05:53:59 AM »
Sorry to be a pain, MB, but like Castlebee I wanted more emoticons too.  I checked where you said on the help pages, and the only thing that comes up is the same string of smileys that appears above the box when you type a post.

:(



1455
Current Talk '02 I / Re: More 1795 Comments
« on: March 08, 2002, 05:46:51 AM »
Quote
Hi Vlad I'm new to this board and as for the Jerimieah question about being Barn's uncle I think the writers locked themselves into this with a scene in 67 where Barn is telling Julia about his Uncle Jerimieah. In that scene he talks about OLD Jerimieah marrying Josette so of course that changed too in 1795! In the beginning of the show it was revealed that Jerimieah built Collinwood too - so I guess the character had a pre-history of being a family elder who was a great architect so making him turn out to be Barn's brother woudn't have worked. I guess. I liked the revival series having Jeri being Barn's younger brother -it made more sense.


Hi, Thom ...

My apologies for not responding to your post sooner -- learning to navigate on the new board has been time-consuming, and I fogot to respond the first time I saw your post -- anyway, a belated welcome to the board (in case no one else has already welcomed you!)   :)  And thanks for the info!

:) :) :)