Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Philippe Cordier

421
Leonard Maltin? ... Honestly, almost anyone can call themselves a film critic  - and, yes, even once and a while they're bound to get it right simply by the law of averages.  ;)

I know, I know, I recognized the incongruity of my reference, but I couldn't think of another critic off-hand who I knew had a review of "Woman in the Window" (or it may be that he commented on the film in his mini-review of "Scarlet Street.")

If we're talking popular (with an emphasis on popular) movie/video review books for quick reference, I do find his comments to be a cut above the others I've looked at.

(And yes, I know I said elsewhere that I was ducking controversy by going out of town - but I noticed this computer in the hotel lobby and hopped on.)


422
Not sure I want to become embroiled in a controversy (and I'm going out of town so I won't be able to get too embroiled), but I never watched DS looking for happy endings.

While I was shocked at Vicki's fate, I wouldn't presume to dictate what I think should happen on a TV show or in a novel I read.  Life is full of tragedies, and I thought this segment reflected that.



423
Wish I could see "Woman in the Window".  Leonard Maltin, for one, ranks it highly.  It never aired on TCM when I had cable, and it hasn't been released on DVD last I checked.

I saw Jean Cocteau's "Orphee" at the Stanford Theater ... a modernization of the Orpheus myth that DS also used at the end of the Quentin/Amanda storyline.  Among other great films, I also saw Bergman's "The Seventh Seal" for the first time there.



424
I really don't see why they needed to invent the syphillis story.  It didn't make much sense to me

I think they brought in the syphilis angle because some biographers have speculated that Stoker might have had it, though there's no evidence.  (Nice how biographers like to speculate.)

I liked Warren simply because he played the part with a different twist.  Since so little of the dialogue or story from the book was used, it made it easier to accept Dracula being very different from how he was described in the book.

Which is not to say that Marc Warren wasn't an interesting casting choice, and I'd be interested in seeing more of his work.  He has quite a list of credits, mostly for British television.

Quote
I actually thought certain scenes may have owed a debt to Dark Shadows. Mina and Lucy's meeting with Dracula on the Whitby cliffs, for one.  (I don't think they actually filmed in Whitby.  For my money, Dan Curtis' use of Whitby locations was really quite imaginative in his version of this tale.)

I don't remember Dan Curtis using Whitby locations.  Are you sure you're not thinking of the earlier BBC version with Louis Jourdan?  They did use location filming in Whitby for that one.

425
I agree with MB that the program had a good visual style, and the music helped create tension.  The castle on the hill, though, immediately reminded me of the fake model "Collinwood" used in the opening credits of the 1991 DS revival series.

I'm glad I was forewarned that this wasn't a close adaptation of the novel.  As a new interpretation, it had some good moments and interesting backstory to some of the characters.

Overall, I didn't care much for the way Dracula was portrayed.  He was very creepy at the beginning, something along the lines of "Nosferatu," rather than following Stoker's descriptions.  I thought both the early scenes and the youthful Dracula might have owed something to the Coppola version (in my view, the worst version).  They also seemed to borrow the twisted idea from that movie that staking Lucy was a substitute for having sex with her.

I managed to miss the sex scene between Dracula and Lucy so will have to watch my tape of it sometime.

The part about the occult worshippers owed its inspiration to one of the Christopher Lee/Hammer "Dracula" movies, I forget which one.

The movie really lost me the first time Dracula ripped off someone's head, and I was hoping it wouldn't happen again, but it did.  That seemed more like something a horror movie monster would do, not Stoker's warrior count.

And I actually thought the last scene with the aged Dracula hiding among the street people was kind of lame.

Nevertheless, as a stand-alone movie, I enjoyed it over all, but I wouldn't rate it as a good version of the novel.  I wish they would have given it some other title than "Dracula," which was so misleading.  And the trailer had the best scenes.

426
Current Talk '07 I / Re: Characters whose personalities changed
« on: February 10, 2007, 10:26:41 PM »
Another character who changed drastically - due more to a change in the writers' concept of her than to character development, IMO, though one could argue that there was a natural change in her attitudes over time - was Mrs. Johnson.  Remember at the beginning of the series, she had nothing but dislike for the Collins family and their high-and-mighty ways.  She went to work at Collinwood in order to spy on the family - especially Roger -  for Burke Devlin - or at least he convinced her to use her position at Collinwood to help him plot his revenge against Roger.





427
Current Talk '07 I / Re: Characters whose personalities changed
« on: February 09, 2007, 04:14:54 AM »
The character who I thought changed - too radically - was Beth in 1897, when she went to work for Count Petofi.  I didn't find that change believable, although others have rationalized it.


428
Hoping not to go too much off-topic, I'll make a quick tie-in with DS.  Remember how the early part of the 1897 storyline drew a lot of inspiration from "Jane Eyre"?  For that matter, the whole governess situation that DS began with had many echoes from the novel.   ;D

I agree with David that DS viewers should find "Jane Eyre" of special interest.  From what I read about the recent BBC production that aired a couple of weeks ago, though, people who hadn't read the book loved it (for example, the San Francisco Chronicle reviewer, I think it was, thought it was great but showed he wasn't very familiar with the original novel's ideas); many of those who know the book, on the other hand, had big reservations.  I only turned it on for a few minutes, and at first was taken in by the beautiful settings, the filming, the costumes (probably too beautiful).  And I think this actress may have been right for the part had it been written true to the book (though she was probably too pretty).  And I usually hate to say that anyone is "wrong" for a part, but Toby Stephens (besides being way too pretty) was not Charlotte Bronte's character at all ... If I could let go of my impressions from the book, I might have been able to sit back and enjoy it (especially if I had thought more about DS).

That will be the challenge for me with the new "Dracula".  As a great admirer of Stoker's novel, every production has disappointed me to some degree, although some more than others.  (I rank Dan Curtis' version as one of the better ones.)  Some of the early Barnabas scenes on DS reminded me of the Stoker novel.

David makes a good point about previous versions of "Dracula" not adhering much to the novel.  I'll do my best to take his advice :

I look forward to this new Dracula as I would to any old fashioned Gothic chiller!

429
I was enjoying last Sunday's BBC-produced Victorian mystery on PBS, and after the credits ran I was glad I hadn't turned off the TV, because what followed was a preview for this coming Sunday, February 11's "Masterpiece Theater."  Two lovely young women in an exquisite Victorian bed chamber - then a shot of vampire bites on the neck of one of the women.  At first I exclaimed, "Carmilla"!  Coincidence of coincidences, because I was in the midst of re-reading LeFanu's novella "Carmilla," a story I hadn't read since I was 11 years old.  However, it turned out not to be "Carmilla" after all, but a new production of "Dracula."

The count himself appeared very young, slouched on a divan, perhaps, looking very much the Byronic hero, and also rather "Goth."

You can see a trailer here:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/dracula/index.html

I'd also recommend going to the Internet Movie Database to read the comments there.  The production aired in England over the holidays, and it didn't get very good reviews.  The consensus is that it has little to do with the book, although it does a great job creating an authentic atmosphere.  Opinion is divided on the actor playing the count.  I will say that he gave a compelling performance as the creepy Monks in the BBC production of "Oliver Twist" a couple of years ago.  So, he may not look like Stoker's count, but that hasn't stopped other movie versions.  At any rate, it should be of interest to vampire aficionados.

430
I don't think it's a coincidence that many descendants of executioners today are in science and engineering professions.

Where on Earth did you find statistics indicating that the descendants of executioners are more likely to be scientists and engineers?  I would LOVE to see that source!!!

I would have to characterize the evidence as anecdotal.  It's based on my own observations from reading many sources particular to one region and my correspondence with independent researchers.  I would like to do further reading relating to England to see if this observation holds true there or has been noted in reputable sources in English.  It makes sense to me, though, given that continual experimentation was necessary (e.g. using precise weights, measures, and angles) combined with a rational temperament and the ability to distance oneself from emotion.  These weren't cold, barbaric people.  Executioners were sometimes called upon to aid physicians in the case of accidents and in surgery.  To cite only one example in the case of a noted person in the sciences, Louis Pasteur had many executioners in his ancestry.

I'm trying to be concise and don't want to go off-topic further.  In fact, I would be interested in bringing the discussion around to the execution scenes in DS.  Since this thread is getting awfully long, does anyone think a new but related topic on that subject could be started?

-Vlad

431
I've read some stories like the one Arashi cites but don't know how common they are.  The profession of executioner, at least in northeastern France where I've investigated it, required a high degree of performance, and the executioner was accountable to the duke, by whom he was appointed.  On occasion, a potential executioner was deemed unsuitable.  Successful methodology called upon scientific thinking as well as intimate knowledge of anatomy, such as was possessed only by one other profession, that of physician.  I don't think it's a coincidence that many descendants of executioners today are in science and engineering professions.

-Vlad


432
Current Talk '07 I / Re: Diversity of The Actors
« on: January 30, 2007, 03:48:05 AM »
KLS is of Norwegian (I think) descent, ... we know Alexandra is Danish

Yes, Kathryn Leigh Scott is a nice Minnesota girl whose parents were born in Norway, and her family name is very Norwegian.

The Von Moltke family is originally German but some of them emigrated to Denmark for military and diplomatic posts in the 18th and 19th centuries.

433
Current Talk '07 I / Re: Nathan Forbes.....who can figure him out?
« on: January 29, 2007, 06:58:02 PM »
This is a good reading explaining the character of Nathan Forbes.  Sometimes I wonder whether we as viewers are required to fill in too many blanks in order to explain some of the actions and motivations of certain characters, but it does make for more interesting viewing.  If there were no ambiguities (or loose ends, or inconsistencies ... ), then there wouldn't be too much to think about or discuss.

The first time I viewed 1795, I thought Forbes' character changed too drastically.  Although there are a few hints early on that he may be a rascal, I didn't feel prepared for what his character ended up becoming.  Yet looking back at the storyline as a whole, I think it is plausible that Forbes' character was planned like this from the beginning.  I would have wanted to see a few more hints early on explaining his character, but that may not be how the genre works.  Surprise twists in characters and events may increase viewership.  But only the writers and producers could say for sure, and possibly the actor, Joel Crothers, who can no longer tell us.

434
Current Talk '07 I / Re: DS: The First Year (book)
« on: January 27, 2007, 08:56:21 PM »
Hi, Midnite, thanks for your message.  I'm not sure what caused the errors I was experiencing but at least I'm "in."  (I thought at first maybe my registration status had expired ...  :o).  I'm using IE because the forum looks better with it than with Mozilla.  But since last updating IE, I can no longer get into my gmail account and had to switch to Mozilla, so maybe it's an IE problem.   ???

Quote from: Midnite
The login spaces at the top right of the home page do not work with most browsers, btw, but attempting to use this shortcut should bring up a second login screen.

I think this is what happened.

Thanks for letting me know that the image is "actual size" as it appears.  After checking the www.darkshadowsfestival.com website more closely, I then realized that there probably wasn't a larger photo.

Regarding the book - if anyone is able to describe the episode summaries (length, depth, accuracy), it would be interesting to hear.  I didn't realize at first that the episode summaries were for the first year only, though (duh!).

435
Current Talk '07 I / Re: DS: The First Year (book)
« on: January 27, 2007, 04:51:14 AM »
I would be interested in knowing what the episode summaries are like.  The brief episode descriptions in the "episode guide" book from Pomegranate Press are generally very good  -  I remember a couple of inaccuracies, but they are succinct and capture the most important points overall).  It would be nice to have episdoe summaries in book form that are a little more detailed.

Note to moderator - I wasn't able to enlarge the cover picture in Dom's post - when I clicked on it, the board said I needed to register in order to view it, that I didn't have permission to view it (this happened after I logged in, which, incidentally took two tries ... ).