Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mark Rainey

481
Current Talk '04 I / Re:1991 DS/WB DS observations
« on: April 06, 2004, 08:13:10 PM »
Quote
Of course, it's completely understandable to believe that nothing can ever come close to recapturing the same magic of the original DS. But at the same time, there's no reason not to believe that something different, but possibly equally special could potentially be created - not to replace the original - but to coexist alongside it. That's the way I see the '91 series, and I'm hoping a WB DS might turn out to be something even more interesting. After all, valuable lessons were learned with the '91 series, and one can hope that a WB DS would both build and improve upon them...

Very much agreed, MB. Although I'll be the first to acknowledge -- and bitch about -- many of the problems inherent in the 91 DS, I'm still a fan. Not to mention an unabashed fan of NoDS. I'm one of those who would probably prefer to see a next-generation-style DS rather than yet another retelling, but at the same time, I'm very excited about the prospect of a new one, regardless of the form it takes. Who knows, this one may put the 91 series to shame and find the longevity it deserves. Or it may not. But I'll stay cautiously optimistic until the show itself proves itself worthy or unworthy of following.

--Mark

482
Current Talk '04 I / Re:A Date That Will Live in Infamy
« on: April 03, 2004, 03:44:21 PM »
Quote
I also thought maybe the whole cancellation was a big April Fools' joke on us.

Same here exactly. The only other time I'd been so heartsick was when Gretchen Wickliffe told me she wanted to be "just friends."

And yes, I tuned in on Monday, hoping against hope, only to find that dratted gameshow. I started scribbling Dark Shadows stories in my notebook at school, putting my hair into pointy locks (I had hair back then, you know), and generally all-around doing everything I could to make sure DS lived on in my heart till it could come back round again.

--Mark

483
Current Talk '24 I / Re:WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: March 28, 2004, 05:05:51 PM »
I absolutely loved Angelique's emergence from the fire in the 91 DS. It was actually quite frightening, made all the more intense by Willie's panicked reaction to it -- I think it was the first moment in the show where I decided Jim Fyfe wasn't so bad after all. ;)

--Mark

484
I happened upon pictures of the Hywet House while looking up some architectural info for Labyrinth of Souls. Talk about the perfect design for Collinwood.... wow. I think you're quite right, MB, about it combining elements similar to both Seaview and Lyndhurst to excellent effect. I don't suppose they'll be sending crews to Ohio, alas...

There's a superb view here that might be reminiscent of the Collinwood pic above...

http://ianadamsphotography.bizland.com/store/media/architecture_wsgashol.jpg

--Mark

485
I'm a Law and Order junkie. I'll have to watch out for this one!

--Mark

486
Current Talk '24 I / Re:WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: March 15, 2004, 11:16:22 PM »
Quote
For instance, I always thought it would have added extra dimension to have had Angelique played by a dark skinned actress with a Caribbean flair to her.

This would indeed be interesting. At least one of the Ross Dark Shadows novels (I believe it was The Foe of Barnabas Collins) described Angelique exactly this way. I imagine it was written directly from the original character treatment, before Lara Parker would have been cast. On the other hand, perhaps not; I'm pretty well convinced Dan Ross never saw an episode of Dark Shadows in his life.

I'm also very much hoping the setting is more convincingly New England-ish. The howlingly obvious California setting of the 91 series (in combination with the Collinwood miniature) was distracting enough to destroy the necessary suspension of disbelief.

--Mark
P.S.
Quote
>>when I was a con last year.<<

Say what, Mark???!!

With all the online exchanges that don't even approach the king's English, Darren has to go and catch me in a very silly typo. Watch it, buddy, or I'll edit yer movie! ;)

487
I watched this thing the other night with my daughter, who astutely described it as a train wreck she couldn't turn off. Silly, silly, silly, yet occasionally engaging. The actresses playing the Angels' really nailed them, appearance-wise, especially Christina Chambers as Jaclyn Smith. Lauren Stamile made for a convincing Kate Jackson, despite such an exaggerated accent, and what can one say about Kristina Helfers except that she -really- had the hair down pat.

Loved the whole 70s ambiance -- masterfully done.
The whole thing had the air of parody about it, though, and I dunno if I could sit through it again.

Wait a minute... three gorgeous women playing three gorgeous women... Yeah, I could sit through it again. ;)

--Mark

488
Current Talk '24 I / Re:WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: March 13, 2004, 05:18:30 PM »
Marley does bear a passing resemblance to Lara Parker, although from the few things I've seen her in, I don't know if she's quite right for Angelique. I'm not sure how well she would portray "sinister." I did see Sugar and Spice a while back; I think it was on HBO when I was a con last year. The movie was sort of a (mediocre) black comedy, though from I recall, she was reasonably good in it. She may well be a fine choice for Vicki, although I'm not likely to ever get over Joanna Going. I've putting in requests since 1991 for Joanna to come be my governess, but I guess they keep getting lost in the mail.

--Mark

489
I saw Secret Window tonight too. Johnny Depp and John Turturo were much better than the movie as a whole. It was reasonably close to the story, which, as I said, didn't do a lot for me; but Depp was fabulous, a bit surly, with some inspired lines. And I kinda liked the ending, which I'll not spoil here. I'll give it a C for content, an A+ for casting.

--Mark

490
HAPPY HAPPY HAPPYBIRTHDAY
B O B    T H E    B - M A N !

--Mark

491
Current Talk '04 I / Re:Roush Riff
« on: March 06, 2004, 06:24:16 PM »
I don't think a Barnabas younger than mid-thirties would ever quite sit right with me. So much of the character is his erudite manner and wordliness that no one younger (even if they've lived a couple of centuries) properly exudes. The whole idea of Barnabas having a kid sister has never worked for me, and if I'd had my way, I'd have made her his daughter from a wife (or lover) whose life had ended in some unpleasant fashion, leaving him heartbroken over her loss, all the more devoted to his daughter, and both ecstatic and somewhat guilty over finding a new love in Josette, complicated by his foolish affair with Angelique. To me, such a scenario seems so much more rational and less taxing on the imagination.

--Mark

492
Current Talk '04 I / Re:New DS Format
« on: March 06, 2004, 06:06:30 PM »
Quote
Is anyone curious to see Kingdom Hospital,(not sure that's the right name)  looks kind of interesting.

After watching Kingdom Hospital, the first word that comes to mind is B-O-R-I-N-G.

--Mark

493
Current Talk '04 I / Re:New DS Format
« on: March 06, 2004, 06:04:25 PM »
Quote
I thought I was the only one who liked the original Sam Evans. In the long run, David Ford ended up being a great replacement for Mark Allen.  But, I adored  Allen's philisophical and cryptic musings too! He left the show way too soon. He looked the part of a run-down alcoholic artist with the wild hair and secrets to hide!

I've often believed that the original players for certain roles, even if they were short-lived, had it all over their replacements. Through his longevity in the series, David Ford became the Sam Evans I think most fans identify with; but Mark Allen may have been the more interesting actor in the role. Not to demean Ford at all, because I really like him and appreciate his contribution (I don't think Allen would have fit the role of Andre DuPres so well), but I completely agree that his more tormented and world-weary Sam Evans made for an engaging aspect of the show that I would love to have seen continued.

Same could be said for George Mitchell as Matthew Morgan. Though Thayer David probably is, was, and always will be the most charismatic, versatile, and appropriately utilized actor in the show, as Morgan, he was almost a letdown after Mitchell's eccentric, rather manic character. In regard to Morgan, my emotional response to the two actors was that I admired David's ability to portray the character with some aplomb; Mitchell's screen presence made me genuinely nervous.

--Mark

494
Quote
But what do writers call it when they use the real name of a friend in their fictional stories? In Elizabeth Massie's book, 'A House Divided', one Mr. Robert Issel(Hey.....that's me!)  appears in text as a trail-blazer of sorts.

That's called Bobubizing, and although it's not quite as common a practice as Tuckerizing, some of us have been known to do it.

A House Divided is the other novel I co-wrote with Beth Massie, although my name's not on the cover for contractual reasons. Some of the Civil War research we did for Thomas Rathburn's background in Dreams of the Dark found its way into that book as well.

--Mark

495
Quote
My favorite actor playing one of my favorite writers!!

Only the name, not the character, is similar. I shouldn't wish to be in Mort's shoes. ;)

Quote
(Hey ya know, they should pay you something)

Why, yes they should, shouldn't they? But wait... if I had to pay all the people whose names have found their way into my tales, I'd have had to file for bankrupcy a long time ago...

--Mark