But did the article have to appear in that fish-wrap rag of a newspaper? Having to go to a "NY Post" site makes me want to go wash my hands, and wipe off my monitor screen......
Having to go to a "NY Post" site makes me want to go wash my hands, and wipe off my monitor screen......
Quote from: Raineypark on April 08, 2004, 06:19:28 PMHaving to go to a "NY Post" site makes me want to go wash my hands, and wipe off my monitor screen...... I hear you. But the thing is that someone at DCP must have some sort of a relationship with the NYP because more often than not it's the paper that's the first to print updates like this. Large readership or no, it's not the way I'd go - but then, no one asked me.
I can't say I wouldn't have been happier had it been published in a different paper (well, except maybe the National Enquirer ).
The article itself doesn't take anything even approaching a stand against Angel. And how is quoting a statement like, '"It's not going to be 'Buffy' and it's not going to be 'Angel,' " a source said, adding quickly, "although we love both of those shows,"' anti-Angel?I love Angel, and as I've said, I hate to see it go. But it's looking more and more like some of the Angel fans need to seriously limit their caffeine intake because, when it comes to the subject of DS on the WB, they're bouncing off the walls with very little provocation...
I'm sure I'm not the only fan out there who'd rather not see Collinsport overrun with Klingon-vamps (as I call them).
As for Frid, it's no surprise whatsoever that he declined an appearance.
Now let us all pray that no one at the WB is stupid enough to schedule the new DS in the old Angel time slot.....or there will surely be throngs with torches and pitchforks in the streets.
I'd LOVE to know what role he was offered.