178
« on: December 06, 2010, 10:01:26 PM »
thanxs for posting what she actually says, i couldn't honestly remember, i was actually trying to but i haven't watched the episode for awhile so bear with me. anyways, i think at some point in (1968) she should have come back even if it was just one episode. i also never noticed she grew to be quite honest.
why did she send Vicki to the past anyways? it may sound like a stupid question to some, but she never DID learn who Barnabas truly was. that he was a vampire & etc.. yes she met him as a human & liked him very much. but she never did put two & two together.
neither did any of the family for that matter. not counting "Carolynn" cause since he bit her. plus she never told
anyone anyways, i also would like have if they had her also trying to stop things from happening instead of her
going back to normal after the curse was lifted. i always did like when Barnabas would involve the entire family on in on his plans for stopping whatever threat was going on instead of course when he was the threat. anyways, as for the past, does anyone wonder what kind of tutor Vicki well governess i mean, Vicki was suppose to be? i mean when it comes to history of course, cause she could teach her about what happens 100 years from then, or hell even 50 years. but since not a lot in history since there's so much of it
NOW has happend at least in (1795) wouldn't it be kinda of hard for her to think of what happened before that year? odd question i realize that but also a bit funny if you think about it.