my only real criticism would be that he tended to chew the scenery as much as he chew the ingenues' necks, especially when he had the contacts and the fangs in...
And I was just getting all enthused about 1991 DS.... I'm still optimistic but weon't look for BC as my big protagonist to identify with.Dan Curtis's big idea for the character of Barnabas was for him to show up in the community, be bad, and bite more and more people until he was caught and destroyed, right? He held onto that, and when Barnabas became something else, he tried to "correct" things in HODS. Then he tried to "correct" it again in 1991 DS. As "visions" go, it doesn't really deserve all those second chances, does it? Isn't it just the typical generic vampire tale? I think that the thing that made Barnabas special was that he wasn't that generic vampire DC wanted.
However, IMO, DC never understood why DS charmed so many people.
As far as homoeroticism, I don't know what the script would entail, but I have no doubt that Johnny would have no problem biting a man's neck and making it look sexy. He's cool that way! And I'm a straight woman but I would definitely not mind such a scene!
Apropos of nothing at all, I noticed that (while the act is not shown) we see bleeding fang marks on Sandor's neck when I was first watching 1897. Remembering that Barn had bit Willie on the wrist, I couldn't help thinking at the time "so, he likes 'em big and swarthy...."
Depp starring (he's afraid of nothing and nothing's brother)