It would have been really interesting if, instead of cancelling the show, they had taken it to an evening time slot. Then the adult themes could have been explored, and an entirely new audience found. But no doubt even Curtis would never have believed the show could develope an adult audience.
But no doubt even Curtis would never have believed the show could develope an adult audience.
Quote from: BuzzH on October 11, 2006, 11:33:44 PMI never said he did, go back and re-read my post!You said "perhaps he didn't actually walk off the set" so there had to exist a reason to even make the clarification/correction in the first place.
I never said he did, go back and re-read my post!
I could be wrong, but I assumed BuzzH was commenting on Gothick's remark that he'd read online that Frid walked off the set but had never seen a published report.
DS did have an adult audience. Publicity for the show was aimed at both teenagers and adults, and many articles loved to tout the show's attraction to adults as well as teenagers. Though, of course, airing during the daytime, DS didn't have nearly the adult audience that it would have taken to make DS a primetime hit.
I remember seeing a clipping from a magazine published in Jan. of 1971 introducing Keith Prentice to teen readers and commenting that he had signed a "five year contract" for DS. Difficult though it seems to believe now, the DS TPTB may have been hoping to have Prentice be the hot new male property on the show.
The one thing I would like to have seen when Julia, Barnabas and Stokes return to 1971 is to somehow have an Angelique lookalike come into the Blue Whale or something after the Historical Center Opening and faint in front of Barnabas, fade out....otherwise I was okay with it ending how it did..
Quote from: Gothick on October 11, 2006, 07:29:19 PMthe cancellation of STAR TREK at the end of the Sixties. But still, TV Guide never ran an article on "here's what happened to Capt. Kirk, Mr. Spock, and Lieut. Uhura after the show ended."True, but they did get 6 movies!
the cancellation of STAR TREK at the end of the Sixties. But still, TV Guide never ran an article on "here's what happened to Capt. Kirk, Mr. Spock, and Lieut. Uhura after the show ended."
Anyone know why Thayer was chosen over Frid? You'd think Frid would have been chosen.
It was all so spontaneous and rushed on DS, that I'm guessing Thayer just happened to be there.
And 1897 was darkly, disturbingly "romantic".....
They were rectifying the supposed (ratings?) mistake of leaving 1897, I guess. Only, 1897 did so well because of writing and not just atmosphere and romanticism. And 1897 was darkly, disturbingly "romantic", very different from the straight-ahead romance of the 1840s.