Wow, what a fascinating installment - most definitely a must watch/listen for fans. It's great to finally see completely tangible proof of what was going on behind the scenes, situations that some fans have been in complete denial of, but which they'll have to believe now that it's being presented in black and white in actual letters.
Another thing: some fans of hoDS have been to say the least reluctant to believe how badly the film was reviewed by the mainstream entertainment press, something I've pointed out numerous times only to have those fans insist it wasn't true. So again, tangible proof in the form of actual reviews might finally help to make it clear to them that it is true.
And when it comes to the whole situation with Frid in the final months of the show and how some have said he said he didn't want to play Barnabas anymore, as the podcast rightly points out he never said that. Though what I'd heard was that what he said was that he didn't want to play Barnabas as a vampire. But with all the friction between DC and Frid back then, if that bit really is what he said, it doesn't always seem to get mentioned.
Very strange notion that they were actually trying to cast Barnabas' "brother." Maybe it was really a recast of Barnabas, maybe not. But who knows how Barnabas could have had a brother unless, like on
Happy Days, where the eldest Cunningham child went upstairs and was never heard from or talked about again, Barnabas' brother did the same so that's why he never factored into 1795/96.
![Wink [ghost_wink]](http://www.dsboards.com/SMF/Smileys/classic/ghost_wink.gif)
Or maybe Joshua had banished him for some reason, which is something I could easily see Joshua doing, and not only was everyone to act as if he never existed, he wouldn't have even been included in the family history. So, perhaps Barnabas' heretofore unknown brother was going to miraculously appear through some supernatural twist. Who knows?
It's also interesting to see tidbits of information that hasn't been widely known, like how Frid was guaranteed 26 eps in a 13 week cycle, and how he was paid $400 per ep.
And there are two things have always perplexed me, and those are things that Diana Millay and James Storm have said. Diana claimed on many occasions that during the last months of the show she was preparing to return as Laura, and James has said that he was having costume fittings to play a different character. The thing is, though, that in their remarks I don't remember if either ever pinned down the actual time frame when those things took place. Perhaps it was before it was decided to do 1841PT after 1840 and the storyline Diana and James were gearing up for was simply jettisoned when the show was canceled. But it would be interesting if even after it had been announced that the show had been canceled and the show was already working on 1841PT, they were still making plans for some sort of upcoming storyline should some sort of reprieve/uncancelation happen...
And two sidenotes:
Love the flash of the I Ching wands to go back and change things.
And, well, I am so jealous:

And finally, I just about fell out of my seat
![Shocked [ghost_shocked]](http://www.dsboards.com/SMF/Smileys/classic/ghost_shocked.gif)
when I received a shout out regarding how the ratings probably didn't factor too much into the cancellation as some might think. That was very nice of you - though it's not like others haven't said the same thing. I just try to always point it out because of the fact that back in the day other shows with ratings lower than 12 million viewers weren't canceled. I mean, at the time
All My Children was lower rated than DS was when it was cancelled, yet AMC wasn't canceled. According to research I've seen, the top soaps of the '70s saw about 10 million viewers, so if DS had not been canceled and had retained the 12 million, it would have been among those top soaps during the '70s...