I remember reading an essay in which Matthew Hall talked about his father, Sam Hall, pulling at his (Sam's, not Matt's) eyebrows trying to figure out motivations. It seems to me that when all else failed, the writers could always fall back on "Angelique gets some fool notion into her head and follows through on it despite the fact that it's obvious to the meanest intelligence that it makes no sense whatsoever." At the moment Angelique is planning to turn Barnabas back into a vampire despite the fact that she has listened to Dr. Lang's tape recording even more times than the viewers have and she therefore should know that unless she kills Adam, Barnabas will never be a vampire again - and we see no sign of her planning to kill Adam. Or is she? Have I forgotten something here?
If Louis Edmonds didn't burst out laughing when he read the script for today's episode, I would be surprised and disappointed. Roger's seen enough to make him think very ill indeed of Jeff - but it's a dream that prompts him to tell Vicky that it would be a mistake for her to marry Jeff. And when she asks what Roger's got against Jeff, Roger doesn't come even close to mentioning that he saw Jeff kissing another woman that very evening. And what's this with Roger being so nice? It's just wrong.
How is it that Barnabas is able to communicate to Vicky telepathically? That doesn't ring true to me.