121
Current Talk '02 II / Re: The Missing Magda and Barnabas
« on: November 18, 2002, 09:22:25 PM »
Love it, love it, love it. (Especially the expression in the third shot...)
News:
by a streaming service? KLS thinks so!
Be sure to check out: KLS talks to Soaps.com
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 »
122
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Re: OT-car wreck and DS
« on: November 18, 2002, 09:06:49 PM »
I've really enjoyed your postings, and I DO hope that you will continue to be a regular participator.
So sorry to hear of your troubles, a prayer has been sent your way....
So sorry to hear of your troubles, a prayer has been sent your way....
123
Luciaphil's Idle Thoughts '02 / Re: Idle Thoughts--Possession is Nine-Tenths of the Law 10/21-10/23
« on: November 18, 2002, 08:59:33 PM »Quote
RD's been guilty of many things throughout the years, and it's no secret that he's not exactly my favorite DS performer, but I SERIOUSLY doubt he would have stuck his hand down anyone's clothes in full view of the DS cast and crew. Not even as a joke. And no matter how much DC may have liked him, something tells me that RD would have been sent packing if he'd even tried...
Oh, yeah, you are probably right. Sigh...It justs seems like it would be a small next step from what we DO see happening in front of the camera. I'll slink off now...
124
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Vampire Victims
« on: November 18, 2002, 05:46:51 AM »Quote
But, i had always wondered how vampirism had came to be.....
The most way cool version I've seen yet was in Dracula 2000, which I avoided seeing because of reviews but loved it when I saw it anyway. Dracula was the first vampire and he had been Judas Iscariot. Think of the aversion to the cross, silver and some other things that my tired brain isn't thinking of.
As for perpetuating vampires, personally, I like the Buffy "sucking thing" and the "sire" business, but many shows, DS included, just have someone dieing of a vampire attack as the "he/she will rise again" determinator. I knew that Barney broke their necks, but didn't realize that he would drain them afterward. It always seemed like he must be one hungry vampire, and since we aren't seeing many victims, I still think that!
Now that we brought up Buffy, did anyone else wish her preppy psych student vampire buddy could have had a longer role? I was really enjoying him!
125
Luciaphil's Idle Thoughts '02 / Re: Idle Thoughts--Possession is Nine-Tenths of the Law 10/21-10/23
« on: November 18, 2002, 05:19:12 AM »
that
Ha! I think you are on to something there....
I STILL think he stuck his hands down her shirt when the cameras were rolling, but not on them. Just seems like the skumbag kind of thing he would do when she couldn't ruin the scene.
Quote
You know, when Ned said "we've been to doctors" in that nasty dismissive tone, I got the feeling that the doctor had maybe suggested that ned stay the hell away from Sabrina.
Ha! I think you are on to something there....
Quote
A request. If anyone should ever happen to meet Lisa Richards, I would dearly, dearly love to know how she refrained from hauling off and clocking Roger Davis when he started up with the naughty touching. He did everything but stick his hands down her shirt.
I STILL think he stuck his hands down her shirt when the cameras were rolling, but not on them. Just seems like the skumbag kind of thing he would do when she couldn't ruin the scene.
126
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Vampire Victims
« on: November 17, 2002, 08:22:26 AM »
Well, it is interesting and OK, I'll even buy that there are different "strains" of vampires, so some can see a cross and others can't, etc.
What I CAN'T understand is why Barney the vampire ever has an enemy. Any of the Trasks should have been NO problemo. Dr. Woodard? No need to force Juleeeaahhh to kill her old buddy, just bring him in line with a convenient neck nip. Hey, same with Quentin, for that matter! Sure it would get boring, but hey, it would be logical.
What I CAN'T understand is why Barney the vampire ever has an enemy. Any of the Trasks should have been NO problemo. Dr. Woodard? No need to force Juleeeaahhh to kill her old buddy, just bring him in line with a convenient neck nip. Hey, same with Quentin, for that matter! Sure it would get boring, but hey, it would be logical.
127
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Hell no, we won't go!
« on: November 16, 2002, 01:07:05 AM »
Poor Nora is like a ghost child herself. At least Jamison has Quentin to pay attention to him. Yeah, he isn't the best role model, but I don't notice anyone else bothering to spend any time with the kid. I think this is the "kids should be seen and not heard" century.
128
Current Talk '02 II / Re: New Selby Role????
« on: November 16, 2002, 12:51:42 AM »
Well, it certainly fooled me and even looking at it I can't tell that it is doctored. Is this in response to the "nude" Grayson Hall photo? I'm still way impressed...
129
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Some Thoughts on the Rev. Trask
« on: November 15, 2002, 08:59:13 AM »
I have to agree with you, it is quite the performance and the abuse of the children is chilling to the bone. And what horrifies me is that I'm afraid many school masters were actually like that. One of my favorite authors, C.S. Lewis and his brother were sent off to a boarding school for several years before the headmaster was permanently committed to a psychiatric hospital. All of the students knew there was no point in trying to tell their parents what went on there, it wouldn't have been believed and they probably would have been punished at home and school.
For the main part, I think the hypocritical man of God has been WAYYY overdone and is quite cliche (though it probably wasn't then). But Jerry Lacey makes it work and gives his villain role a complexity that is fascinating to watch.
For the main part, I think the hypocritical man of God has been WAYYY overdone and is quite cliche (though it probably wasn't then). But Jerry Lacey makes it work and gives his villain role a complexity that is fascinating to watch.
130
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Reverend Ruthless
« on: November 15, 2002, 08:45:50 AM »
Greggie-poo, I love it! I had just been wondering what nickname I could bestow upon him, but no need now. Do you watch on tape? I hope to eventually be able to keep up with DVD.
From what I saw today, Judith was way impressed with Greggie-poo's miracle powers. Actually, it WAS quite impressive, nothing else works with the zombie, but he goes in and BAM! I suppose she thought he could work miracles in more than one room of the house....(and she probably needed one after years of being suppressed and repressed). Unfortunately, she just ended up with another tyrant.
From what I saw today, Judith was way impressed with Greggie-poo's miracle powers. Actually, it WAS quite impressive, nothing else works with the zombie, but he goes in and BAM! I suppose she thought he could work miracles in more than one room of the house....(and she probably needed one after years of being suppressed and repressed). Unfortunately, she just ended up with another tyrant.
131
Current Talk '02 II / Re: New Selby Role????
« on: November 15, 2002, 08:35:18 AM »
Wowee! This was Rocky Horror Picture Show? When did he do that and WHERE in the world did you find this?
132
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 II / Re: Happy Birthday Craig Slocum
« on: November 14, 2002, 07:11:04 PM »
Wait a minute, it's CRAIG's birthday, not Cheryl's right? Either way, HAPPY BIRTHDAY, and Cheryl, if you read this, I miss your contributions to this forum.
133
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Barnabas.......a close talker
« on: November 14, 2002, 07:02:52 PM »
No, I hadn't noticed. But, where an actor stands is designated by the production people, not the actor. Whether they did it intentionally for a mood or not, is anybody's guess at this point.
I don't remember that Seinfeld, but leave it to them to memorialize such a trivial, yet valid point!
I don't remember that Seinfeld, but leave it to them to memorialize such a trivial, yet valid point!
134
Current Talk '02 II / Re: TLTKLS question
« on: November 14, 2002, 05:18:07 AM »
M
Amen, to THAT sister! And not being stupid, it has always driven me crazy.
Yes, Minja, I was a WYT also. And like Carolyn, it just didn't go over all that great. Though at least I didn't marry a Leviathan brat..., or did I?
I do want to reiterate that I was talking about the characters and not KLS herself. I really liked early Maggie a lot, and I'm sure KLS is great. Isn't it interesting though, that NONE of the guys here EVER fantasize about Carolyn or even Angelique? And they are simply beautiful, just not innocent.
Quote
What's the mystery here?
For some men, younger, more beautiful and STUPID is the perfect hat trick.
Amen, to THAT sister! And not being stupid, it has always driven me crazy.
Yes, Minja, I was a WYT also. And like Carolyn, it just didn't go over all that great. Though at least I didn't marry a Leviathan brat..., or did I?
I do want to reiterate that I was talking about the characters and not KLS herself. I really liked early Maggie a lot, and I'm sure KLS is great. Isn't it interesting though, that NONE of the guys here EVER fantasize about Carolyn or even Angelique? And they are simply beautiful, just not innocent.
135
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Magda's girlie run ..
« on: November 14, 2002, 04:49:42 AM »
Yes, and then she got mad at him when he asked for something! Too much trouble! I loved every bit of it too...