DARK SHADOWS FORUMS

General Discussions => Current Talk Archive => Current Talk '25 I => Current Talk '07 I => Topic started by: IluvBarnabas on January 27, 2007, 08:42:04 PM

Title: Eve's obsession....
Post by: IluvBarnabas on January 27, 2007, 08:42:04 PM
I am rewatching the storyline with Adam and Eve and I am at the part where she [spoiler]has met Jeff Clark, believes him to be Peter Bradford, and is determined to steal him from Vicki.

Now Eve believes that by proving to Jeff he is really Peter Bradford he'll call off his wedding to Vicki, which he does after she presents him with the letter from Peter Bradford with his writing on it back in 1796.

Eve apparently also believes that once Jeff learns he really IS Peter, he'll stop loving Vicki and start loving her?!

I don't know how she ever came to that conclusion. If anything, I would think that by her proving he's someone who lived two centuries ago, that would make him hate her even more.[/spoiler]

Is Eve just desperate or just plain stupid? I really don't understand her logic in all this.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on January 27, 2007, 09:07:01 PM
If you were saddled with Adam - especially the Adam at that point in the storyline - wouldn't you be desperate to find a new man?  [wink2]  :D

But seriously, Eve probably believes that because [spoiler]she and Peter were supposedly in love in the past, once Jeff rememberes who he really is, he'll hopefully remember that love. And I don't believe she knows that Peter was also in love with Vicki in the past.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on January 27, 2007, 09:10:45 PM
Is Eve just desperate or just plain stupid? I really don't understand her logic in all this.

As far as your question: "Is Eve just desperate or just plain stupid?" Yes on both parts.

It is my understanding that Eve thinks if Jeff knows his Peter, he'll remember his past, and [spoiler]his time with Danielle.  Then he'll remember he loved her once and therefore, forget about Vicki. Fat chance.  Now that's really stupid because in the past while Peter is in the jail cell, he writes Danielle a letter and tells her he will not go off with her because he loves another [Vicki of course]. So why if Jeff remembers his past would he want Eve now!  Eve doesn't even look like Danielle.[/spoiler]She is just desperate.
[/b]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: IluvBarnabas on January 27, 2007, 09:16:40 PM
If you were saddled with Adam - especially the Adam at that point in the storyline - wouldn't you be desperate to find a new man?  [wink2]  :D

LOL, Good point, MB!!! [grinb]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: IluvBarnabas on January 27, 2007, 09:22:35 PM
Also, Jackie you brought up a great point about Eve not looking the same as she was

[spoiler]when she was Danielle. That would definitely be another strike against Jeff turning to her. And also once Jeff/Peter did remember the past, I'd think he'd also remember she was a cold-blooded murderess, no matter what her motives were, she stuck a knife in a guy's back![/spoiler]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on January 27, 2007, 09:31:00 PM
[spoiler]once Jeff/Peter did remember the past, I'd think he'd also remember she was a cold-blooded murderess, no matter what her motives were, she stuck a knife in a guy's back![/spoiler]

True. But from Eve/Danielle's POV, that wasn't a bad thing, so she doesn't believe Peter will hold it against her. Twisted logic? Probably. But mostly all DS' characters, particularly the villains, operate out of twisted logic.  ;)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on January 27, 2007, 09:31:22 PM
Also, Jackie you brought up a great point about Eve not looking the same as she was

[spoiler]when she was Danielle. That would definitely be another strike against Jeff turning to her. And also
once Jeff/Peter did remember the past, I'd think he'd also remember she was a cold-blooded murderess, no matter what her motives were, she stuck a knife in a guy's back![/spoiler]

Yeah Eve wasn't thinking on all cylinders but then after having 1000 gigabytes flow through your head, your brain's bound to have some "holes".  [smiley_shaking2]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Sandor on January 28, 2007, 12:48:14 AM
And while we're on the subject of Eve, what was up with her silky black evening lounge wear?? Not exactly the thing to go traipsing around the woods in during Fall in Maine... or when you're hitching a ride from Collinwood back to Nicholas' house by the sea.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Nelson Collins on January 28, 2007, 01:13:46 AM
And while we're on the subject of Eve, what was up with her silky black evening lounge wear?? Not exactly the thing to go traipsing around the woods in during Fall in Maine... or when you're hitching a ride from Collinwood back to Nicholas' house by the sea.
Heh, I thought it was awfully thoughtful of Julia, once she finished stitching the old girl up to make sure she was fully dressed and perfectly made up. (I wonder if she just used the dress one of the bodies Willie dug up had on?)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on January 28, 2007, 03:12:55 AM
And while we're on the subject of Eve, what was up with her silky black evening lounge wear?? Not exactly the thing to go traipsing around the woods in during Fall in Maine... or when you're hitching a ride from Collinwood back to Nicholas' house by the sea.

I'll never understand that either! [shaking head]  Marie Wallace was [still is] a very beautiful woman but a man-made woman like Eve doesn't need a silk dress to wear on her "birth" day.  Did she ever take it off or was it sown on her?  And that green sweater Carolyn gave Adam, he never took that off either!  Whoops, sorry to get off the topic of Eve.  Just thinking about Eve's dress in the dead of winter makes me cold.  [shockeyes]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Brandon Collins on January 28, 2007, 03:34:28 AM
I personally never got that storyline. It seemed like a GIANT waste of time to me. I mean, it's stupid for the valid points brought up:

1. Peter/Jeff was in love with Vicki, no matter which person he was.

2. Eve looks NOTHING like Danielle, so why would he instantly fall in love with her again? Why would he even believe her in the first place? Just proving to him that he's really Peter and not Jeff wouldn't make him automatically believe that she's Danielle.

3. Peter wrote her that letter saying that he was in love with someone else.

4. He had to know how evil and nasty she was!

Such a waste of time. The entire story...
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on January 28, 2007, 03:58:46 AM
I liked the parts of the Adam storyline where they had to deal with a "child" in a man's body.  I thought Robert Rodan do a great job being that "innocent" child, learning to talk and comprehend a world all new and wondrous.  But his world was also filled with what seemed like cruel and confusing people.

For me, it fell apart with the introduction of Eve.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Lydia on January 28, 2007, 04:04:15 AM
1. Peter/Jeff was in love with Vicki, no matter which person he was.
Why should Eve accept that reasoning any more than Angelique accepted the "Barnabas is in love with Josette" reasoning?

Quote
2. Eve looks NOTHING like Danielle, so why would he instantly fall in love with her again? Why would he even believe her in the first place? Just proving to him that he's really Peter and not Jeff wouldn't make him automatically believe that she's Danielle.
Eve may not look like Danielle, but her soul is the same.  And she believes that Peter is her soulmate.  As for Jeff believing her....she's working on that.

Quote
3. Peter wrote her that letter saying that he was in love with someone else.
Too bad.  Peter and Eve are soulmates.  They belong together.  And so on.  Peter just needs to be brought to his senses.  She's working on it.

Quote
4. He had to know how evil and nasty she was!
She wasn't evil and nasty.  She was just pragmatic.  Just ask her!

My problem with that storyline is that it just seems so completely unlikely to start with.  Peter was a nobody, living in a nothing town, so what would Danielle see in him?  That, in fact, was what I liked about the Vicky/Peter story:  Peter's a nobody who becomes somebody.  But the Eve business just wrecks all that.

PS:  Brandon, I hope I didn't come across as overly harsh.  I didn't mean to be, but it can happen when I get opinionated.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on January 28, 2007, 04:08:12 AM
And that green sweater Carolyn gave Adam, he never took that off either!

How quickly you forget Adam's PJs:

(http://www.dsboards.com/images/pjs.jpg)

And the plaid shirt:

(http://www.dsboards.com/images/plaid.jpg)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Alondra on January 28, 2007, 04:47:04 PM
If you were saddled with Adam - especially the Adam at that point in the storyline - wouldn't you be desperate to find a new man?  [wink2]  :D

Adam's not so bad. I liked him until Nicholas got a hold of him. While he was under Professor Stokes' influence he was becoming a nice guy. Enter Nicholas and all that changed, he became a jerk. He wasn't bad looking other than the scars. Give me Adam any day over Jeff Clark or any other Roger Davis character.

Alondra
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: adamsgirl on January 28, 2007, 05:04:15 PM
Adam's not so bad. I liked him until Nicholas got a hold of him. While he was under Professor Stokes' influence he was becoming a nice guy. Enter Nicholas and all that changed, he became a jerk. He wasn't bad looking other than the scars. Give me Adam any day over Jeff Clark or any other Roger Davis character.

Well, obviously, I agree completely with that, Alondra -- LOL!

As far as Eve went, remember that Stokes said of her [spoiler]she was the most evil, most dangerous, and most POWERFUL woman of her time.[/spoiler]

Because of that, naturally she felt she could, once again, ensare Peter.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Nelson Collins on January 28, 2007, 05:17:51 PM
I was surprised that Eve did not remember more of her past life.  I thought it was Nicholas' express desire for Eve to have the life force of someone evil that he could control.  It makes no sense (to me anyway) for Eve not to be alive with all the memories of Danielle/Leona.

But then again, we are talking about a man who expects to breed Adam and Eve like one would a pair of thoroughbreds, to create a race of superhumans to server his master and control the world, but picking apart that daft scheme is a subject for other threads ... :)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Alondra on January 28, 2007, 05:24:31 PM
Well, obviously, I agree completely with that, Alondra -- LOL!

I thought you might Adamsgirl. ;)

Alondra
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Brandon Collins on January 28, 2007, 06:15:34 PM
No, Lydia, you didn't come across as harsh. It didn't much matter what you wrote because it seems that we are both in agreement that the Eve storyline was quite preposterous in the first place, so the more minute details make no nevermind.

But, what you DID do was portray Eve's line of thinking, when seems rashional when you explain it, but while watching it seemed quite the contrary.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: michael c on January 28, 2007, 06:17:09 PM
am i forgetting something?

wasn't danielle as well as eve played by marie wallace?if i'm remembering this correctly except for the clothes eve and danielle looked exactly alike. ???
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Evan Hanley on January 28, 2007, 06:54:48 PM
I have to agree that eve period is horrible. Marie Wallace is such a good actress but i dont like her as eve. The whole adameve period was so boreing. the only thing i like was that my fav character of all time was on Nicholas Blair. [spoiler]I was very sad lolll when nicholas died.[/spoiler] I have said this before Dan Curtis did not use Humbert Allen Astredo talent enough on dark shadows. I like adam in the begining to when he is just learning to talk and all. but as much as i love nicholas he did ruin adam!!

Evan
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on January 28, 2007, 07:11:10 PM
wasn't danielle as well as eve played by marie wallace?if i'm remembering this correctly except for the clothes eve and danielle looked exactly alike.

[spoiler]Your confusion is understandable. But Leona Eltridge was the real Danielle. However, when Eve went back to 1796, Danielle looked just like Eve to the audience.  :-   Presumably, though, she looked like Leona/Danielle to everyone else - especially since Peter and Ben recognized her.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: IluvBarnabas on January 28, 2007, 07:45:36 PM
Adam's not so bad. I liked him until Nicholas got a hold of him. While he was under Professor Stokes' influence he was becoming a nice guy. Enter Nicholas and all that changed, he became a jerk. He wasn't bad looking other than the scars.

That's what I say too. Adam really was a sweet, innocent, lovable kind of lug until he crossed paths with Nicholas. I lost a lot of the affection and sympathy I felt for him at the beginning of his storyline once he [spoiler]kidnapped Vicki, then tried to strangle her, then kidnapped her AGAIN![/spoiler] When he did those things, it was a real struggle not to hate his guts at that point.

Still I think Adam was basically deep down a good guy who just fell in with the wrong crowd (Nicholas and Eve). Had he listened more to Professor Stokes instead of Nicholas who knows just how much better things would have turned out for Adam in the end.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on January 28, 2007, 10:24:30 PM
And that green sweater Carolyn gave Adam, he never took that off either!
How quickly you forget Adam's PJs:

And the plaid shirt:

Yes yes, I remember those.  Once he recieved that sweater he didn't take it off until he got shot and ran to Stokes.  Thank god for the red plaid... it looked good on him too. Oh, so for once he didn't sleep in it either.  [clap]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on January 28, 2007, 10:30:44 PM
I was surprised that Eve did not remember more of her past life.  I thought it was Nicholas' express desire for Eve to have the life force of someone evil that he could control.  It makes no sense (to me anyway) for Eve not to be alive with all the memories of Danielle/Leona.

I agree, if the experiment had worked as Lang dictated on the recorder, she should have remember her previous life.  In which case why does Nicholas think he can control her?  She was uncontrollable during life in the past, she certainly wouldn't be controllable in the present.  What's to keep her from killing Adam and running away?  She certainly wasn't afraid of Nicholas nor beyond defying him.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: MagnusTrask on January 28, 2007, 10:51:42 PM
Is Eve just desperate or just plain stupid? I really don't understand her logic in all this.

Now I can come here, since in my viewing (first time since orig. airing) Eve is clearly gone... you know, who knows?  She could come back from anything on DS.   But anyway, as for the question asked, it's perfectly sensible.   People often wonder why an obviously unsensible character doesn't think or act sensibly.     People are different, with different views of the world and motivations than ours.

It's the most common thing in the world for one person to be so in love with another, or so infatuated, or fixated, or whatever (latter two in Eve's case I'm sure) that the infatuation is so overwhelming and so keenly felt by the first person, that he or she cannot imagine that the other person does not share in it.    This is experienced as something more solid than any logic.   I think that some people probably think of love as something separate from themselves, that exists "out there", in the space between the two people, or in a space enveloping the two people*, or else it wouldn't feel so enormous and "real".   What they feel is just inside themselves, though.

Besides, killers are selfish and self-obsessed.    They decide things for other people... whether they get to live, whether they're in love, whatever.   Not having the ability to call the shots doesn't occur to them.     Reality is what they say or think it is.

*Perhaps Prof. Stokes has a theory about this "love bubble".... an alternate state of existence that can't actually happen in our continuum....
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: adamsgirl on January 28, 2007, 10:54:41 PM
I agree, if the experiment had worked as Lang dictated on the recorder, she should have remember her previous life.  In which case why does Nicholas think he can control her?  She was uncontrollable during life in the past, she certainly wouldn't be controllable in the present.  What's to keep her from killing Adam and running away?  She certainly wasn't afraid of Nicholas nor beyond defying him.

Let's not forget that Nicholas was on a "mission" from his master, Diabolos. I think that's why he felt he could control her. He was the more powerful of the two. Silly man! He should have known he couldn't control a woman -- LOL -- just like the disaster with Angelique. He couldn't even control her when [spoiler]she was a vampire, even though he made her that way.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on January 29, 2007, 12:47:49 AM
Let's not forget that Nicholas was on a "mission" from his master, Diabolos. I think that's why he felt he could control her. He was the more powerful of the two. Silly man! He should have known he couldn't control a woman -- LOL -- just like the disaster with Angelique. He couldn't even control her when [spoiler]she was a vampire, even though he made her that way.[/spoiler]

Yes Nicholas definitely had a hard time controlling the women in his life!   And he never learned... they both defied him constantly. [rofl10]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on January 29, 2007, 04:32:26 AM
How quickly you forget Adam's PJs

Oh, so for once he didn't sleep in it either.

Once that we know of. But even though we never saw it, somehow I feel we can infer that while Adam was living with Nicholas, he didn't sleep in PJs as simply a one-time thing. After all, in his own twisted way, Nicholas was schooling Adam to be a proper man. One may think that might have also included buying Adam some other clothes. But let's be serious about that - Nicholas wore the same suit day in and day out, so why would he teach Adam any differently?  ;D
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on January 29, 2007, 06:46:18 AM
Oh, so for once he didn't sleep in it either.
Once that we know of. But even though we never saw it, somehow I feel we can infer that while Adam was living with Nicholas, he didn't sleep in PJs as simply a one-time thing. After all, in his own twisted way, Nicholas was schooling Adam to be a proper man. One may think that might have also included buying Adam some other clothes. But let's be serious about that - Nicholas wore the same suit day in and day out, so why would he teach Adam any differently?  ;D

Actually I was speaking about Adam not sleeping in that "green sweater" but I don't mind imagining him not sleeping in his PJs or anything else for that matter. haha
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Gerard on January 29, 2007, 11:34:01 AM
I couldn't understand Eve's obsession, thought process and motivation at all, which was probably another reason why I never liked that whole Adam story line.  She was obviously an intelligent, highly self-serving woman, so instead of hanging around there, allowing herself to be put through all the crappola she had to endure in order to find some way to make things work for her favor, why didn't she just pack a bag, snitch some money from under Nicholas' mattress, and catch the first bus out of there?  I mean, would you put up with having to pretend you like some guy that would cause the cast of Extreme Makeover to scream, take the condescending attitude and bullishness of Nicholas, and why-oh-why would you want to get some wus to like you?

Gerard
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Nelson Collins on January 29, 2007, 01:01:35 PM
I couldn't understand Eve's obsession, thought process and motivation at all, which was probably another reason why I never liked that whole Adam story line.  She was obviously an intelligent, highly self-serving woman, so instead of hanging around there, allowing herself to be put through all the crappola she had to endure in order to find some way to make things work for her favor, why didn't she just pack a bag, snitch some money from under Nicholas' mattress, and catch the first bus out of there?  I mean, would you put up with having to pretend you like some guy that would cause the cast of Extreme Makeover to scream, take the condescending attitude and bullishness of Nicholas, and why-oh-why would you want to get some wus to like you?
I tend to agree.  They did almost nothing with Eve.  She was there as a prop for the Adam story and I don't think the writers gave her much thought beyond,"hey wouldn't it be cool for Adam to have "Eve?"  Though based on her behavior she ought to have been called Lilith (Adam's first wife).

But then, the show didn't have very progressive attitudes about women at that time, so even "the most evil woman who ever lived" was still put her under the thumb of a man, and all her so-called "evil" was undercut by her obsessive love for a man who doesn't love her back (Peter) (sound familiar?).  Also, why she would have fallen for Peter doesn't make any sense either.  Why would she fall for a man who was as good and virtuous as Peter (the male equivalent of Vicki).  I mean, if anything, he comes across as even weaker in the qualities she looks for in a man than Adam himself!  At most he was the kind of man one thinks she would use rob and dump or kill.  But no, because she is a woman, she has to be all weak and "womanly" and dominated by men. 
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on January 29, 2007, 04:22:35 PM
Actually I was speaking about Adam not sleeping in that "green sweater" but I don't mind imagining him not sleeping in his PJs or anything else for that matter. haha

Oh, I understood you meant the green sweater. But you said that "for once he didn't sleep in it," so I was just trying to point out that chances are he didn't sleep in it more than once - which also goes back to your original point that he never took the green sweater off.  ;)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Brandon Collins on January 29, 2007, 04:53:55 PM
I'd have to agree that there was most likely no other motivation for Eve other than (1) Nicholas wants to create another race so he needs another person, and (2) wouldn't it be cool if Adam had Eve? It's obvious that they were unsure of what to do with her, and so they used to her add in more unnecessary drama into the Vicki/Jeff/Peter (wow, that looks odd) relationship just to have something else to do with them so they wouldn't have to get married so soon. Not to mention the ratings boost they may have gotten from their breif stint back in 1795, which later became overused at the end of the 1897 storyline.

Perhaps Adam's storyline would've been better off without Eve, but then again without Eve we probably would've never had Marie Wallace, so I guess we just have to take the good with the bad on this one.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: dom on January 29, 2007, 08:17:10 PM
I love Eve. I can't keep a straight face when she's in a scene. I am laughing now just thinking about it. At this stage of the game the show may as well be a comedy (as far as I'm concerned). It's the only way I can get thru it. Personally, I think it's this portion of the show that earned DS it's 'camp' reputation.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: MagnusTrask on January 30, 2007, 12:27:13 AM
It's everything else in the storyline that ruins DSs reputation, except C Blackburn and J Karlen, who kept acting like real actors no matter what, and added a lot of reality in the few moments they were on.     I think Marie Wallace's appearance started to turn things around.  She had real life and presence, and seemed to want to be there.   And at no time was the character "weak and womanly and dominated by men".    She knew her own self-interest and was biding her time so that she could leave in a better state than some woman in a black nightgown thumbing a ride or asking for handouts.  She didn't even know what a bus was, had no money, and knew better than to fumble her way into a completely unfamiliar world on her own.     Was she going to get a job someplace?
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Nelson Collins on January 30, 2007, 01:24:36 AM
I love Eve. I can't keep a straight face when she's in a scene. I am laughing now just thinking about it. At this stage of the game the show may as well be a comedy (as far as I'm concerned). It's the only way I can get thru it. Personally, I think it's this portion of the show that earned DS it's 'camp' reputation.
Oh, I love Eve, too.  Marie definitely has fun with the role, and I so love here story about how she got the part, deliberately waiting to be the last one at call backs, seeing what it was that DC wanted and teasing up her hair! LOL
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Nelson Collins on January 30, 2007, 01:32:13 AM
It's everything else in the storyline that ruins DSs reputation, except C Blackburn and J Karlen, who kept acting like real actors no matter what, and added a lot of reality in the few moments they were on.     I think Marie Wallace's appearance started to turn things around.  She had real life and presence, and seemed to want to be there.   And at no time was the character "weak and womanly and dominated by men".    She knew her own self-interest and was biding her time so that she could leave in a better state than some woman in a black nightgown thumbing a ride or asking for handouts.  She didn't even know what a bus was, had no money, and knew better than to fumble her way into a completely unfamiliar world on her own.     Was she going to get a job someplace?
Good points all, and to be fair she was much stronger (or at least more defiant) than Ang of that period (Ang in whiney voice - "master, he's being mean to me...make 'im stoooooopppppp!")

But I still can't imagine a woman like her wanting someone like Peter for anything more than a patsy.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: MagnusTrask on January 31, 2007, 01:55:25 AM
agreed.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: michael c on February 01, 2007, 12:53:43 AM
I love Eve. I can't keep a straight face when she's in a scene. I am laughing now just thinking about it. At this stage of the game the show may as well be a comedy (as far as I'm concerned). It's the only way I can get thru it. Personally, I think it's this portion of the show that earned DS it's 'camp' reputation.

i agree.it's here that the show(quite deservedly)begins to become known for high camp. :-X
during this period i alternated between being amused and annoyed but i stopped being emotionally invloved.it was just too silly.

i think there were some episodes that actually had no human characters in them.just monsters!that's kind of hard to take seriously.since the 1968 monsters were essentially disposable characters i didn't really "care" about what happened to them.

that said i was surprised that i did enjoy marie wallace's portrayal of eve.i thought she injected a(much needed)bit of naughtiness and fun to an otherwise dull,dour storyline.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: IluvBarnabas on February 01, 2007, 01:15:50 AM
I can see why some see the show as camp, but I never did seeing as how I NEVER stopped being emotionally involved with the characters and stories no matter how silly they may be at times. But hey that's just me.

After all Barnabas and Quentin weren't born monsters, but got turned into them as adults, but you could see they clearly did NOT want to be monsters......that was what kept me emotionally involved with them.

Granted the Adam/Eve story was silly at times, but when you take the premise what their true purpose was for Nicholas, [spoiler]and that was to create a master race of super beings devoted to serving Nicholas and the forces of evil[/spoiler] it's actually pretty chilling.

I think part of the reason DS might be considered campy was because of the numerous bloopers, but to me that only added to its appeal. I mean if DS can screw up on almost a regular basis with actors messing up lines, falling sets, flys flying around actor's noses and so fourth, yet the stories are so emotionally compelling, the acting brilliant that you can still take it seriously then I think that's the work of a really great show.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on February 01, 2007, 01:28:49 AM
I can see why some see the show as camp, but I never did seeing as how I NEVER stopped being emotionally involved with the characters and stories no matter how silly they may be at times. But hey that's just me.

It's not just you.  :)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: MagnusTrask on February 01, 2007, 04:17:07 AM
I think DS was apopropriated temporarily by cynical TV idiots, the kinds of network people who pressured every other show to go "camp" because of the success of Batman.    Lost in Space went from being an intermittently respectable space adventure for intelligent kids, with some real science-fiction content, to goofiness.     This was done by people who didn't enjoy DS or Lost in Space, or anything imaginative, and didn't enjoy what they turned these shows into, either.    They thought it was all trash, and thought making it all stupider would increase ratings, because people like stupid, because they are stupid, to these executives.  I think it was just that cynical.

I'm not dismissing DS in 1968 as trash.   I think the conscientious people working on it must have been at odds with people pressuring them from above.   The show was compromised, but at least they were working on 1969/1897 while putting out the 1968 episodes.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on February 01, 2007, 04:35:30 AM
The person who pretty much thought people like stupid because they are stupid was actually someone who worked within DS. And that person was constantly battling with the writers over the content of the show and often threatened to fire them if they didn't follow his ideas.  [wink2]  And many fans have often opined that DS was often successful in spite of this person rather than because of him...
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Jackie on February 01, 2007, 05:42:26 AM
Hmmm, now who could you possibly be talking about..?..  >:D[wink2]

The person who pretty much thought people like stupid because they are stupid was actually someone who worked within DS. And that person was constantly battling with the writers over the content of the show and often threatened to fire them if they didn't follow his ideas.  [wink2]  And many fans have often opined that DS was often successful in spite of this person rather than because of him...
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: MagnusTrask on February 01, 2007, 10:09:08 AM
Is it who I think it is?   Just worked it out; couldn't be anyone else.   Perhaps some people should be spoken ill of, whatever their life status.   Late 1968 just knocked the wind out of me.    It's starting to make me angry under the surface, I'm starting to suspect.    I feel myself appreciating 1841PT now, without even seeing it again, by comparison.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Lydia on February 01, 2007, 10:49:23 AM
Perhaps some people should be spoken ill of, whatever their life status.
Veering off onto another subject entirely...the whole "Don't speak ill of the dead" business must be tough in Dark Shadowsland.  "I'd like to say something uncomplimentary about Quentin, but I can't remember: is he dead today or not?"

1968 didn't hit me that hard, but I was very happy to see Tom Jennings when he appeared, and not just because he's easy on the eyes.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: MagnusTrask on February 01, 2007, 11:02:00 AM
Factor in that I'm burning myself out, marathoning it all.    I just went through a whole year in, however long it's been since you sent the tapes.   
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Lydia on February 01, 2007, 11:50:44 AM
That's a year's worth of episodes in just 3 weeks.  Maybe the title of this thread should be changed from Eve's obsession to Magnus's obsession.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Alondra on February 01, 2007, 06:04:46 PM
Easy to do. I watched several entire storylines in a few weeks' time myself after getting all the DVD's. Now I will lay off for a while because I have other things to do but it sure is great to be able to watch DS anytime you want.

Alondra
;D
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Elizabeth47 on March 01, 2007, 04:00:00 PM
I have to agree that eve period is horrible. Marie Wallace is such a good actress but i dont like her as eve. The whole adameve period was so boreing. the only thing i like was that my fav character of all time was on Nicholas Blair. [spoiler]I was very sad lolll when nicholas died.[/spoiler] I have said this before Dan Curtis did not use Humbert Allen Astredo talent enough on dark shadows. I like adam in the begining to when he is just learning to talk and all. but as much as i love nicholas he did ruin adam!!

I agree with you Evan, the Adam/Eve storyline was a little dull, but it did give us the opportunity to enjoy Nicholas Blair more frequently!   Yes, Humbert Allen Astredo is awesome.  He's my fav!  >:D
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: MagnusTrask on March 01, 2007, 04:42:42 PM
I think Eve's appearance was the very beginning of the turnaround, that led into 1969/1897.    The plot and much of the writing were still intermittently awful, but the show seems to wake up a little, and a bit of a spark comes back, when Eve begins speaking.   
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on March 01, 2007, 04:54:46 PM
Wecome, Elizabeth47! It's nice to see you posting.  :)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Gothick on March 01, 2007, 05:04:36 PM
Hi Elizabeth47,

I agree with you 100 percent about Humbert's characterization as Nicholas Blair.  His vivid, dry, supremely witty scenes are one of the top reasons why 1968 is my personal favorite storyline.

I particularly enjoy Astredo's scenes opposite Grayson Hall and Lara Parker, but he seems to have had a knack of making anyone opposite him on screen shine.  Even Craig Slocum!

Welcome to the Boards,

G.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: loril54 on March 01, 2007, 05:40:16 PM
Welcome Elizabeth47

HAA is the only person that could have played Nicholas Blair.  The chemestry was great with a lot of the actors it seamed so real. GH, MW, LP did put out fireworks when working with HAA.  That is the only thing that I liked about 1968 story line was not the story, but the fireworks with all the actors. Besides the flubbed lines, you can see that the actors really got along.

Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: IluvBarnabas on March 01, 2007, 06:28:38 PM
Welcome to the forum, Elizabeth47! [knockwood]

I totally agree Humbert Allen Astredo is great as Nicholas! He gave Nicholas such suave and charm, you can't help but be drawn to him. I really love his scenes with Lara and Grayson too.

The scenes between Grayson and Humbert that I really enjoy is [spoiler]one when Julia informing Nicholas about Angelique continuing to attack Barnabas, then returns the next day to treat Adam and both scenes they play a sort of cat-and-mouse, Julia informing Nicholas she knows about him and his plans, Nicholas firmly denying everything.

when Nicholas approaches Julia about bringing Eve back to life after she was murdered by Adam. Julia won't be intimidated by Nicholas and flat out refuses, until Nicholas threatens harm to Barnabas and Adam. Julia is forced to back down.

I loved just about every scene between Humbert and Lara as Nicholas and Cassandra/or Angelique the vamp.
I really enjoyed seeing him lay the smackdown on her when she dared go against his orders.[/spoiler]
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Gothick on March 01, 2007, 08:38:46 PM
Just reading further back in this thread and amused to reflect that the individual to whom MB referred kept telling the actors not to worry about flubs and poor performances because the show would go out the one time and then be forgotten--like Kleenex.

I cannot help laughing because now in 2007 EVERY EPISODE has been made available in both DVD AND VHS.  And I have a friend who downloads the shows on a file sharing site somewhere or other.

That's awfully long lasting Kleenex, doncha think?

Fascinating too, that awful as 1968 purportedly was, some of us who had the whole thing on tape felt compelled to collect EVERY disc of the DVD release *throws mental glance at bookshelf back in bedroom*

G.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: loril54 on March 02, 2007, 03:48:40 PM
I wonder if Dan always had this plan to release them somehow?? Why would he have saved them. Are there any other Soap Opera's that are on tape??  Maybe Dan talked to Julia from  her trip forward in time.  :-X :-X
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on March 04, 2007, 06:40:07 PM
And once again:

It's a common misconception that Curtis preserved the DS episodes, but that's not actually true. Curtis has never owned them. ABC did and then ownership was transferred to Worldvision. ABC is who should be thanked for preserving them. ...

There are several topics on the forum that have pointed out this fact.  :)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Elizabeth47 on March 05, 2007, 03:40:40 AM
But let's be serious about that - Nicholas wore the same suit day in and day out, so why would he teach Adam any differently?  ;D

Actually, Nicholas had about three suits.  One was light grey, another was a darker grey, and then he had another which was light brown, which he looked especially handsome in by the way.   [firedevil]   Also, thank you for welcoming me to the board.  I'm very pleased to be here  ;D
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on March 05, 2007, 04:12:08 AM
Actually, Nicholas had about three suits.  One was light grey, another was a darker grey, and then he had another which was light brown, which he looked especially handsome in by the way.

He did?! Apparently I need to pay much closer attention the next time I watch the '68 storyline because they've all looked nearly identical to me for all these years...
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Elizabeth47 on March 05, 2007, 04:16:04 AM
HAA is the only person that could have played Nicholas Blair.  The chemestry was great with a lot of the actors it seamed so real. GH, MW, LP did put out fireworks when working with HAA.  That is the only thing that I liked about 1968 story line was not the story, but the fireworks with all the actors. Besides the flubbed lines, you can see that the actors really got along.

Yes, when you watch Humbert in a scene, notice how "connected" he is with the other actors. By this I mean, he doesn't stay in his own space, isolated like some actors do, he has great eye contact, and usually he will touch the other actor in some way, like putting a hand on their shoulder, or with the ladies, taking their hand in his, that type of thing.   I think this technique makes him a more exciting actor to watch, and gives him that, shall I say, sensuality.  Also of course he has an amazing powerful voice (as does Jonathan Frid).
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Midnite on March 05, 2007, 04:26:45 AM
Welcome, Elizabeth47!  Nice HAA tribute website.  :D

BTW, text must appear between the 2 color tags for them to work (you might find the posting section of the Help pages, er, helpful for using board codes; also the topics on the Testing 1, 2, 3 board), though black doesn't show up well with the current default board theme.  :)
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Elizabeth47 on March 05, 2007, 04:33:30 AM
He did?! Apparently I need to pay much closer attention the next time I watch the '68 storyline because they've all looked nearly identical to me for all these years...

Well, when it comes to Astredo, I pay very close attention  ;)   You will see the light brown suit in the episodes that follow the scene where Nicholas get's into trouble with the "D" man downstairs.  The change is subtle, but it's there.   
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on March 05, 2007, 05:47:19 AM
Well, when it comes to Astredo, I pay very close attention  ;)

Indeed you do because to my memory all he ever wore was this gray suit (seen here in Ep #629 (in the scene with Diabolos), Ep #630 (in a scene with Barnabas), and Ep #631 (in a scene with Chris):

(http://www.dsboards.com/images/ds_629-842.jpg)
(http://www.dsboards.com/images/ds_630-916.jpg)
(http://www.dsboards.com/images/ds_631-138.jpg)

But lo and behold he wore a darker gray for his "marriage ceremony" with Maggie in Ep #632:

(http://www.dsboards.com/images/ds_632-434.jpg)

Quote
You will see the light brown suit in the episodes that follow the scene where Nicholas get's into trouble with the "D" man downstairs.

But if you can see a brown tint to any of those, you have a much more perceptive eye (or a better TV screen and/or computer monitor) than I.  ;)  Even the suit Nicholas wears in Ep #633_634, his last in the '68 storyline, appears to be the same one he wore in the previous episode to me (though the lighting for that show makes it appear gray, blue and even green):

(http://www.dsboards.com/images/ds_633_634-525.jpg)

Did we ever see the darker gray suit before Ep #632?


The next thing we know, a very devoted Robert Rodan fan will become a member and tell us that Adam didn't really wear the same green sweater in all those episodes after all. And if so, that would be a huge shock!  :D
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: MagnusTrask on March 05, 2007, 02:54:19 PM
BTW, text must appear between the 2 color tags for them to work ... though black doesn't show up well with the current default board theme.  :)

I use the accessibility features, which create a black background with white letters (as well as blowing up print to about a centimeter high), though some graphics and print show up in color.    Message boards which have their thread titles in dark colors result in an unreadable and almost invisible list of threads, for me.    They'll be dark blue or something, against a black background.

All print within a post here seems to be showing up well.    Maybe a dark color would always appear white for me.    I just thought I'd throw that in as a possible thing to factor in, though.     E47, if you'd succeeded in getting black print, I might not even have been able to see it.    I'm just one person though.

By the way, if you're bored out of your skull, try turning on your accessibility features to the way I have them, high contrast, white-on-black, Windows extra large.   It was pretty psychadelic for me when the new graphics kicked in.    Be sure tro click on "full screen" under "View" though, or there won't be enough room on the screen to see anything much.
Title: Re: Eve's obsession....
Post by: Sunny_Collins on March 05, 2007, 10:00:27 PM
Welcome, Elizabeth47! You're going to have a lot of fun here.  :)

INHO, Marie Wallace gave Eve a very chilling nature. She was cold, and creepy, it's no wonder Adam turned out so unlikeable. You would to if you had to go out with Eve!  ;D