As is well known, I'm a fan of the Leviathans story. Despite the nay-sayers, I continue to maintain that it had some of the best episodes of the series--or at least some of the best scenes. Frid's performance is tight as a drum, the character of Julia is better used than she had been since '67, they bring back Nicholas Blair, Leviathan Liz actually brings some zest back to a character that had been reduced to a sham of her former glory, etc. etc.
I hope he did at least mention the Anna Nicole Show. That terrorized me more than 5 years of DS ever did!
If Mr. Hofstede thinks all this is one of the "dumbest" things in US television history, he ought to take a cruise through the serried ranks of today's "reality" programming. I hope he did at least mention the Anna Nicole Show. That terrorized me more than 5 years of DS ever did!
i think Frid not wanting to be Barnabas anymore cost that show more than any storyline!
I had no idea JF didn't want to play Barnabas, anymore.
Isn't it obvious?.... Barnabas would have gone from Dracula to Sherlock Holmes.Can't you just picture him, with Julia as his "Dr. Watson".....solving mysteries all over Collinwood?Well, minus the cocaince habit ......
Quote from: Maybellique on January 15, 2005, 02:33:05 AMI still don't get that leviathan storyline... what exactly happened during that time? ~DJThat's precisely what those of us who've actually seen it wonder. I couldn't summarize it if my life depended on it.
I still don't get that leviathan storyline... what exactly happened during that time? ~DJ
Well, minus the cocaince habit ......
     I had no idea JF didn't want to play Barnabas, anymore. That's what it would have been like if Heather Locklear had refused to play Amanda on Melrose Place while it was in its prime. That's one surefire way to send a show careening down the toilet. ~DJ
The Leviathan story should have been a lot more interesting than it was. Jonathan Frid, for instance, was turning in his best performances in ages, the stuff with the kid is deeply creepy, and some of the long-term links with 1897 were fascinating, particularly Julia tracking down Tate.Problem is, we don't really get that story. It starts, then the writers seem to lose confidence, and begin wildly changing track, with the result being a very random bunch of half-stories that don't really deliver what the early episodes promise.I think also the writers didn't do much to ease the transition after spending *way* too long in 1897. The show had hit its peak viewing figures during that time, so there were segments of the audience who had never experienced DS in the present day. They make very few concessions for the casual audience - after nine months away, they really needed to restart the present day story afresh and reintroduce the characters properly.Pity - it was a nice opportunity to get back-to-basics and try a fresh angle. It could have worked great with some subtle tweaks and a little more long-term investment.
(an excerpt from her soon to be published study FIGURING FRID) j/k