I was glad to buy and read the new revised book over the past month or so, but - with all due respect to the authors - I was very disappointed by the large number of inaccuracies I encountered. One example: after HODS did so well at the box office, the book reports that Warner Bros. wanted a sequel. Of course, it was MGM that wanted the sequel. Another example: the years in which actors performed on the show, or did other work, is often contradictory. I'm sure this is due to bringing two books, by two different authors, together. But, these are two examples of many incorrect bits of info in the book--as most die-hard fans will also realize upon reading it. Is this a damnation of the authors No. Just a wish that more thorough proofing and editing will be done in the future. JMHO. Brian
