Is this the same St. Germain that Elizabeth Clare Prophet and her gun-packing cult latched onto?
And what a coincidence (?) that this character claimed to be related to a noble family named Rakoczy---close enough to the DS gypsy "Rakosi"
Is this the same St. Germain that Elizabeth Clare Prophet and her gun-packing cult latched onto? Â I may still have a copy of one of their books around. Â (My friend's mother bought it by mistake years ago because she thought, from the cover picture, it was about Angels revealing the big secret of Fatima, or something like that.)And what a coincidence (?) that this character claimed to be related to a noble family named Rakoczy--- close enough to the DS gypsy "Rakosi" (or however the DS writers spelled it. Â It seems they were all over the place, in the literary field.) I have a magazine with an article about the American beginnings of the St. Germain cult (prior to Prophet), which began in New Jersey, of all places, and still has an HQ there. Â Interestingly, they've apparently registered copyrights on the names "St. Germain" and "Ascended Masters", with the encircled-R symbol following these terms at all times.
Chelsea Quinn Yarbro's Saint-Germain-as-a-vampire persona is also a copyrighted fictional character (i.e. people can write about the real life man but the vampire persona is hers). Unfortunately Quinn has had to point it out many times in fan fiction related issues. :-(
That's interesting. Â So even if the ff is written for recreation and not for profit, the creator can still prevent fans from writing about it?BTW, it's great to see all these posts from you, Wiley!
http://www.writersu.net/?link=authpolicy
Amazing -- the 18th century chemist and businessman is now a New Age "saint" and a vampire!?!Although biographer Jean Overton Fuller represents St.-Germain's primary interest as developing dyes for fabrics (this is what the documentary evidence shows), it's clear that he at least had a philosophical side, and that of an esoteric and metaphysical nature. The record is vague as to the precise nature of his esoteric interests and involvement.Fuller reproduces a poem he wrote in French which she claims is unique in its philosophical/metaphysical outlook. She even goes so far to say that the poem reveals a depth of metaphysical wisdom (note, these are my terms, I don't recall her exact terminology) unparalleled in anything else ever written.This is a pretty heady judgment, and one I question. When I investigated medieval alchemy texts, I saw some of the same ideas expressed, and in a similar manner, as in the poem written by Comte de Saint-Germain. This suggests to me that he was familiar with alchemy -- and may have practiced it (something Fuller rejects on the basis of there being no documentary evidence and the result of later mythologizing about him). So he may have had esoteric, philosophical interests. Â This makes him an interesting man in my book, but unfortunately it doesn't dismiss the possibility that he may have been little more than a charlatan, akin to some New Age gurus of our own time.