Author Topic: Yet Another New Slideshow  (Read 21711 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 15968
  • Karma: +205/-12176
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #60 on: May 14, 2011, 06:28:32 PM »
I would be interested to hear more about the context for the past two or three days' images in this series.

I've finally gotten the chance to get back to this. The captures/quotes in question:


Ep #4 - Victoria (referring to the woman and child in the painting):
'Do you know who this is?'



Ep #4 - Roger: 'Miss Winters. This room... and everything in it...
doesn't exist anymore.'

come from scenes in Ep #4 that were actually scripted for the pilot, presumably as a followup to the scene in which David scared Victoria with a tarantula in a cigar box in his desk. The scenes were never included in the pilot but, thankfully, like the scene in reply #54, they were rescued and became a part of Ep #4.

As for context, Victoria is once again attempting to teach David when she sees him looking inside his desk. She demands to know what he has in there but is surprised this time when it turns out to be a small landscape painting. When asked where he got it, David replies that there are a lot of them in a room that he's not supposed to talk about or go to. He then hopes that Victoria isn't going to tell his father. She assures him she won't and suggests they put the painting back.
David leads Vicki to a locked room and produces keys, to which Victoria remarks she supposes she'd better not tell his father about those, either.
Once they enter the room, it becomes obvious that it was used as an artist's studio as it's filled with stacks of canvases, art supplies, and a covered painting on an easel. Victoria asks whose room it is, but an uneasy David simply replies that they should leave. However, Victoria studies some of the paintings and asks who painted them. David doesn't answer. She pulls the cover from the painting on the easel to reveal the image of a nude woman, seen from the back, and holding a child. The painting seems to mesmerize David. Victoria asks if he knows who the woman is. David doesn't answer - but the silence is soon broken by Roger demanding to know what they're doing in the room. Victoria covers for David by claiming that she simply asked David to show her around. A furious Roger tells her she has no business being in the room. At that, David runs out. Victoria apologizes and says she was just admiring the painting, to which Roger angrily retorts that she wasn't hired to admire anything. She was hired to teach David, not to break into areas of the house or their lives that don't concern her. He then orders Victoria to go downstairs, adding, with a touch of sadness to his voice, the line that is quoted with the second capture. She leaves, and then Roger glares at the painting.


Another interesting thing about Ep #4 is that though Wayne Tippet's name appears in the credits, Dr. Fisher is nowhere to be seen - though he is referenced in the scene at the sheriff's station when Deputy Harker informs the sheriff that Dr. Fisher and the coroner have taken Prof. Woodard's body to the hospital. The only thing that seems to exist from Tippet's part in Ep #4 appears to be a photo of a scene that took place at Collinwood with Roger, Elizabeth, Dr. Fisher, Mrs. Johnson and Julia listening to someone (presumably the sheriff) telling them something, which presumably took place after the scenes at the sheriff's station because Julia is wearing the same clothes as she does throughout the first several scenes of the ep.

Offline Gothick

  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 6608
  • Karma: +124/-2879
  • Gender: Male
  • Somebody book me a suite at Wyndcliffe, NOW!
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #61 on: May 17, 2011, 09:32:50 PM »
Thanks for the explanation, MB.  Presumably the deleted scenes involving "the room" had to do with the Laura Collins storyline?

I have to say I love today's capture.  It reminds me of a scene in the Marx Brother classic A Night at the Opera where an outraged Margaret Dumont declares "Well, I never!" to which a raffish Grouche ripostes:  "I bet you have!"

G.

Offline Gothick

  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 6608
  • Karma: +124/-2879
  • Gender: Male
  • Somebody book me a suite at Wyndcliffe, NOW!
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #62 on: May 30, 2011, 06:20:28 AM »
WOW.  Is there any way we could get MORE shots of Michael T. Weiss showing off his gorgeous hairy chest???

A fan in need,

G.

Offline Lydia

  • The Tattooed Lady
  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 7945
  • Karma: +21178/-65913
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #63 on: May 30, 2011, 12:28:03 PM »
Hmm...gorgeous, sure.  Hairy, I'm not seeing it.

Offline DarkLady

  • DSF God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2727
  • Karma: +6/-408
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #64 on: May 30, 2011, 06:52:49 PM »
Oh la la!! Lydia, you just need to look more closely!  [ghost_wink]

Offline Midnite

  • Exec Moderator /
  • Administrator
  • SENIOR ASCENDANT
  • *****
  • Posts: 10715
  • Karma: +717/-4876
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #65 on: May 30, 2011, 06:57:16 PM »
G, it's no coincidence that a quote from that scene made it onto my list.  [ghost_tongue2]

Offline Lydia

  • The Tattooed Lady
  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 7945
  • Karma: +21178/-65913
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #66 on: May 31, 2011, 06:03:10 AM »
Oh la la!! Lydia, you just need to look more closely!
I see hair.  But not terribly much, and not terribly widespread.  Surely there is a minimum threshold for "hairy".

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 15968
  • Karma: +205/-12176
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #67 on: May 31, 2011, 06:07:51 AM »
Have you never seen the '91 Series?

Offline Lydia

  • The Tattooed Lady
  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 7945
  • Karma: +21178/-65913
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #68 on: May 31, 2011, 06:16:35 AM »
Yes, I've seen the '91 series, and commented on it in the Watching Project.  My comment here was about the capture that was given.  I don't remember noticing additional hair on Joe during the series, but as you know, I'm very unobservant.

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 15968
  • Karma: +205/-12176
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #69 on: May 31, 2011, 03:59:29 PM »
WOW.  Is there any way we could get MORE shots of Michael T. Weiss showing off his gorgeous hairy chest???

Unfortunately for Weiss' chest fans, today's capture is about as close as the slideshow will ever get to seeing it again. But here's yesterday's capture:


And[spoiler]Here are two screen captures from Howling IV The original Nightmare - a must own DVD for Weiss' chest fans.  [ghost_cheesy]



(And the only reason it's spoilered is because it isn't DS, so it's actually OT for this topic. But I doubt too many of Weiss' fans will be too upset about that.  [ghost_grin])[/spoiler]

Offline Gothick

  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 6608
  • Karma: +124/-2879
  • Gender: Male
  • Somebody book me a suite at Wyndcliffe, NOW!
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #70 on: May 31, 2011, 04:21:45 PM »
Gods, what a beauty.

Feeling faint, G.

Offline Gothick

  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 6608
  • Karma: +124/-2879
  • Gender: Male
  • Somebody book me a suite at Wyndcliffe, NOW!
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #71 on: May 31, 2011, 08:40:06 PM »
And updating for the "spoilers" ... yeah, spoil me baby!!!

In that second shot, Weiss' chest is practically on the level of soft-core pornography! Or is it my imagination that's supplying the porn.

Va-va-VOOOOMMM!

G.

Offline Heather

  • Senior Poster
  • ****
  • Posts: 857
  • Karma: +26454/-37028
  • Gender: Female
  • It's an Orbach's, darling...
    • View Profile
    • My Portfolio
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #72 on: May 31, 2011, 09:23:37 PM »
In that second shot, Weiss' chest is practically on the level of soft-core pornography! Or is it my imagination that's supplying the porn.

No you're right Steve...well in my mind anyway. LOL ;) Yummy!

Wenchily yours,

Heather


W: http://hrh22.home.comcast.net

In case you didn't realize....Julia rules!  :-*

Offline Mysterious Benefactor

  • Systems Manager /
  • Administrator
  • NEW SUPERNAL SCEPTER
  • *****
  • Posts: 15968
  • Karma: +205/-12176
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #73 on: July 22, 2011, 07:57:31 PM »
I suppose it's fortuitous that Joanna Going is featured in today's screen capture because apparently today is her 48th birthday. There are all sorts of Tweets on Twitter wishing her a Happy Birthday - and mentioning the '91 DS.

Offline Gothick

  • FULL ASCENDANT
  • ********
  • Posts: 6608
  • Karma: +124/-2879
  • Gender: Male
  • Somebody book me a suite at Wyndcliffe, NOW!
    • View Profile
Re: Yet Another New Slideshow
« Reply #74 on: July 22, 2011, 11:09:15 PM »
I love today's photo of Natalie and Vicki.  Natalie's scenes come close to topping Julia's.  And her wardrobe!  I don't know what the design department was thinking, but I keep wondering if someone was winking at us and hinting that Natalie was a "Countess" because she had been running a top-class bordello in Paris and one of the aristocratic customers decided to marry her and make her respectable.  She certainly dresses like a very high-end Madam but more from Balzac's time than the 1780s/90s.  Just my thoughts... Barbara Steele complained in that video interview a couple of years ago that she didn't like doing DS because DC did not allow her to play Julia with nearly the degree of eccentricity she felt the character needed... she clearly WAY made up for lost time with Natalie!

G.