Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pansity

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »
646
Current Talk '06 I / Re: boys club vs. girls club
« on: June 14, 2006, 11:48:46 PM »
Another Babylon 5 fan!  I watched every epsiode of that show about 4 or 5 times, now it's been a few years since it's been on and I'm getting serious withdrawals - more DVD's to buy

Watch out for the sticker shock.  I got a couple Bab 5 seasons from Ebay and even ebay prices for used were super high.  The list price is a LOT higher than most other tv series -- comparable to DS and not near the hours of play time.

647
Current Talk '06 I / Re: boys club vs. girls club
« on: June 14, 2006, 11:40:47 PM »
I liked McCoy and Spock's father, Sarek, the best.

OMG!  Me too!  McCoy was da shit!  And Sarek, well, I don't have a limited edition, signed pencil sketch of him on my wall for nothing!  ;) 

That artwork of Sarek sounds cool.  Mark Lenard (rest his soul) -- boy does that bring back memories.  I was involved with his fanclub way back in the days when the dinosaurs roamed fandom.  Again, the kneejerk reaction.  I saw when I joined that the club had an outdated credit list, so I hauled my little teenage self down to the Lincoln Center Library of the Performing Arts and did a search -- the old fashioned, pre internet way.  Documented everything in this really cool scrapbook that I still have. [book2]

And (to keep this at least peripherally on topic) I am probably the only theater wonk who would really like to get their mitts on David Selby's Doctoral thesis on the history of the American Place Theater.  And Selby being the author is just the added bonus --pipe dream as I know it is,  I would REALLY like to read the work on the company, since Mark Lenard and so many of the Trek stock company of stars and guest stars worked with them in their NY theater days.

Same with many other fandoms over time, especially Star Wars.  Luke was the hero, the one all the publicity materials focussed on -- Han was the scoundrel with the sarcastic sense of humor (similar type to Quentin come to think of it).
Again, I totally agree, you can have your Luke, give me Han!  ;)

Han, Indy, Quentin: all in all Scoundrels DO have more fun! [suspicious_figure]   [egypt] [gramophone] [plasma]


648
Current Talk '06 I / Re: Parallel Time
« on: June 14, 2006, 11:06:42 PM »
You're quite right about PT being a bit too Rebecca-derived.  I picked up a copy of the novel the other day and as I've been reading it, I've noticed how close the plots are.  Even the dialogue is eerily identical.  That said, Rebecca certainly doesn't have the identical twins, Jekyll/Hyde, Carolyn & Will, murder mystery stuff that PT has...at least, not from what I've read so far (I'm about 1/3 of the way through as of now).  I think I ought to watch PT again after I read Rebecca.  I'm enjoying the book a lot, and PT has always been a favourite of mine.

The book is quite interesting; Du Maurier wrote GOOD gothics.  And by the way you're right, you WON'T find the other subplots in Rebecca.  You'll also note a number of other changes to the main plot as you go along.  Interesting thing here is I remember reading the book for the first time in Junior High (I had made the mistake of telling the teacher how many times I'd already read Gone With the Wind, so she insisted I pick something else and recommended Rebecca as something a person who loved GWTW would like.  She was right.  ;D).  By that time DS was over and gone and I honestly don't remember the book reminding me of DS when I first read it.  Then again, maybe I had just missed seeing most of that storyline during the original run. (The mad dash home from day camp when the busses didn't even get back to the school till 4pm did me in on pieces of most of the storylines.)

649
Happy belated birthday!! [occasion16]  Sorry to have missed it -- can I wuss out by saying it was cause I celebrated MINE that day too?  [jester]

Jeannie

650
Happy Birthday!

 [occasion15]

Glad you had a great day for it and had fun.

Jeannie

651
Current Talk '06 I / Re: Parallel Time
« on: June 14, 2006, 01:55:31 AM »
Interesting thread as I have been reading through the posts.  One thing I didn't see mentioned, though, was the fact that the main characters, Quentin, Angelique Maggie and Hoffman were STRAIGHT out of DuMaurier's Rebecca. I think a lot of the weaknesses of the plot come from that: Quentin has to be a bullying jackass, Maggie has to have a backbone of limp linguinini (Keep in mind that the 2nd Mrs. DeWinter didn't even have a NAME) Hoffman/Mrs. Danvers is an obsessed psychopath in love with Angelique/Rebecca, who is rotten to the core beneath the veneer of adoration and perfection.

The thing that makes PT  interesting to watch is how they took is how they combined that plot and Jekyl and Hyde and threw in the original things and it still all worked.

652
Apparently some rookie in the programming department saw all those Buck Rogers episodes and concluded that science fiction = spandex. Therefore, wrestling is appropriate programming for a science fiction network.  ;D

 [laughing_devil]  Scary thing is you're probably RIGHT.  And they're probably NOT rookies either.

I remember when they were first plugging the channel at the local Science Fiction club gatherings 10-15 years ago.  How shocked these guys were that the High Council and members of the Dr. Who Club (The Prydonians of Princeton -- 1200 members in 48 states and 6 foreign countries) were adults with real jobs, and not 15 year old brainburn cases.

They never have had an idea what the target audience for a Science Fiction channel REALLY is.

653
You raise some very interesting points here.  I'd never thought about the parallels ( no pun intended) between Barnabas and Yaeger, but once you mention it it really does seem obvious.  And especially so in the Maggie obsession that you use for your example.

I remember  having come in as a kid with Chris the werewolf and the NICE Barnabas.  Then, the first time I saw the series through, I was totally shocked by seeing Barnabas as a psycho stalker.  Had he stayed that way, I don't think I would have had the same sympathy for the character.  Even at that, seeing it straight through did change the wholehearted sympathy I had had for him at first.

As to whether anyone would have cared if he was dispatched?  Probably not.

Good thing Dan Curtis DIDN'T get what he wanted, else DS would probably have been cancellled on schedule.

654
Calendar Events / Announcements '06 I / Re: Happy Birthday, Nancy!
« on: June 14, 2006, 12:59:13 AM »
 [occasion13] Happy Birthday NANCY.  [occasion1] Hope you have/had a great day.  Found it interesting that you share a birthday with Dorothy L. Sayers.

655
Just some thoughts on the various and sundry posts on the badges.  I've been attending and working Science Fiction and Media conventions since the 70s and have been on a few concoms.  This is MY educated guess on why they do it this way (I have NO connection with the Fest, so this is just my opinion and doesn;'t mean I am right!)

My experience is all cons of this nature do the badges at the event itself, with a registration process of some sort.  Why not mail them out?  Well, for starters, expecially with a bi coastal committee like this one, maybe those who process the incoming registrations don't have access to the equipment etc to run up the badges.  Those might be done on site right before the con, when you have all your dogsbodies (read committee members and volunteers) handy to make up packets and print out badges and put them together. And that's the other factor -- the hands and sheer time to make up all those badges. As Nancy points out, this is NOT a paid job, the organizers do this around jobs, families and REAL LIFE.  So, they are looking for the most time effective way to do things.

Then, if you mail them, there's the inevitable losses to the Pest Offal-- not to mention all the people who wont even bring their receipt with them  -- no matter HOW many times you ask them to -- because they don't read the instructions.  So, you have to make the things up again on site, which is more time and money to essentially do the job twice.

Oh, and as to the issue about late mailings -- don't know how many people here go to Science Fiction or Media conventions, but late mailings of con materials tend to be a standing joke.  Mediawest, a nearly 30 year old media con (sort of like a writer's convention, with panel discussions, etc. as opposed to actors speaking and performing), has a running rep for being late to the point where people are waiting for the day when the progress reports are handed out at registration.  It's par for the course, like the sudden schedule changes, at any fan run event.

656
Current Talk '06 I / Re: boys club vs. girls club
« on: June 14, 2006, 12:31:15 AM »
For some reason, in any ensemble TV show (DS, Lost) I tend to be more interested in the supporting than the main characters (female or male).  Perhaps it's because the central characters are overexposed or because their personalities tend to become too fixed after a time while the peripheral players remain more mysterious.  Has this happened to anyone else?

Raises hand.  I have much the same reaction a lot of the time.  I've always put it down to overkill.  When any one character becomes the be all and end all of any series I have this bad tendency to kneejerk the other way.

 My first fandom was Trek:  Kirk was supposed to be the hero, Spock was the breakout secondary character.  I liked McCoy and Spock's father, Sarek, the best.  Same with many other fandoms over time, especially Star Wars.  Luke was the hero, the one all the publicity materials focussed on -- Han was the scoundrel with the sarcastic sense of humor (similar type to Quentin come to think of it).  Same could be said of my other interests, like Babylon 5, Blakes 7 and The West Wing.  Forget the leads -- bring on the character actors!

I remember missing out on a number of fandoms because they had become SO popular that the  kneejerk reaction kicked in. And, nothing against Tom Selleck, but I got SOO sick of seeing his picture on every magazine in the world that I had less than no interest in seeing anything he was in.

657
My heavenly viewing this weekend was seeing Selby in the Saturday night movie, then Frank Langella and James Naughton on Sunday's Tony Awards-- 3 of my '70s heartthrobs.  :D

Thank you, MB, for getting the Forums back intact!   [hello]

Ditto on the thanks to MB!!!!!!!!!!!!!  I dont want to THINK about how hard it is to get something like this board whipped back into shape.  Must admit I felt like a jinx -- every time I had gotten over here  for a bit, next thing I knew the board had gone down.  Can we get Magda to put a curse on your server? [tongue2]

As to the movie, haven't seen it all the way through yet (got a phone call halfway through from someone I'd been in eternal phone tag with, so have to have time to watch the tape for the last half).  Seemed to me that it was better than average Sciffi fare -- watchable, with a standard SF -plot with some inspiration from Forbidden Planet and various and sundry disaster movies.

Ah, Frank Langella -- boy does he bring back memories.   [love7]   I remember seeing him in his last performance of Dracula on Broadway (back when tickets to Broadway didn't cost a small fortune, oh those were the days!).  FYI he was even better looking on stage -- or when he came out afterwards from the cast party, shirt half undone...... [91a2]

LOL reminded me of a thought recently, of 70s hunks with their lovely long hair.  Look at pics of Langella, Selby and Harrison Ford then -- and look at the super short cuts they all favor NOW. [dsapb]


658
A belated thanks to Midnight for posting this  -- and a slightly behind the times thanks to MIdnight, Arashi, Prof Stokes, Josette, Barnabas's Bride and Mark Rainey for the good wishes.  I haven't been around in an embarrassing amount of time (REAL LIFE biting again in a number of ways)  [a2a3] , so thanks again for remembering me.  [banana]

It was a nice but quiet day -- all I really did was play catchup and go out to dinner.  Oh but that new SciFi Channel movie with Selby was on last night, so what the heck, let me go ahead and insert the obligatory groaner about getting David Selby for my birthday. [angel4].  (Now if I can only get the thing reviewed and up on the site less than 6 mos from now, maybe I'll have something!)

Thanks again for the good wishes all!


659
I know she's been unable to get over here for a while due to computer issues (long story; she can get on line but has problems with this board, which a few of us have been trying to help her with). So please know she's not being rude by not thanking everyone.  If it's not too presumptuous I'd like to thank everyone for her.

I talk to her on IM so will convey everyone's good wishes.

660
Happy Belated birthday MB.

Glad it was a fun one. As so many have said, after all the work you have put in to make this such a great place, you deserve it...and then some.

 As to the tapioca...something tells me that inquiring minds DON'T want to know. >:D

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 »