Ah....
Just when I was wondering how people were able to be addicted to the thing (I don't SEE it enough to become addicted), I just caught it
3 (count 'em....three) times. I got cured once, and cursed twice. So.....well, where does that leave me in essence?? It's confusing.
What I mean is, I don't know how to VIEW this in terms of the price of tea or something. It's supposed to be backwards, right? Cures are bad and curses are good? If I look at the numbers, the number on the left is the negative and the one on the right is the positive? But then, I thought I read that you want more of the NEGATIVE? So that you're "bad" or something? (And that's good?)
See?? I'm so confused I can't even explain my confusion and figure out what to ask to straighten out the confusion!!
Is anyone following this, or am I totally nuts? That's why I'm hard-pressed to ever cure or curse someone 'cause I don't know what it means!
It's rather like taking the proverbial exam in existentialism, leaving all 10 questions blank, and getting an 'A'.
If anyone can explain all this to me you win a free trip to....I dunno....somewhere.
PS Mr. MB.....I'll tell ya something you can work on with the floating thing: Once someone clicks it, it shouldn't reappear when you go back to the page it was on. Example: I'm on the page to post a reply. I saw it and clicked it and it went to the page that tells you if you got cursed or cured. Then when you go back to continue what you were posting, it keeps floating around but it's USED - it's the one you clicked. You can't keep re-clicking it 'cause you get the message that a cousin already clicked it. Soooo....it should be made to disappear once it's been used. Know what I mean? The old thing shouldn't still be floating around on the page it was on when it was clicked already.
How would THAT be for a programming challenge?
God, I need a life. THIS is what happens when I wake up in the middle of the night and post something at 4:09 Eastern Standard Time. (If this time is incorrect, I'm sure MB will be gracious enough to correct me)