Okay, this morbid topic got me wondering...other than to preserve the body for a Wake, just why is this done in the first place? Creepy as it sounds, it isn't like anyone (outside of Collinsport that is) is going to ever dig someone up to see how well the procedure worked. It kind of seems like a waste of effort in a way. ![I Don't Know [idontknow]](http://www.dsboards.com/SMF/Smileys/classic/idontknow.gif)
Well, it was useful when people died far away, and their relatives wanted them brought back home, such as during the Civil War, when it was first widely used. Not to mention the delayed funerals that happened when people had to come in from far away. I'm also inclined to say that with the complete cult that Victorians made of mourning, embalming let them keep the bodies around a lot longer for lengthy rituals.
As to seeing how well the procedure worked, I know of one inadvertent test of that. Anyone else see History Channel's show on the plot to steal Lincoln's body? Here's a link on the story that also gives some background on embalming's history:
http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/jala/29.1/turner.htmlFor those not interested in plowing through the article, the postscript re: Lincoln was that due to the bodysnatching attempt, his body wasn't permanently reburied till 1901. Due to worries about his body lasting for the intial train tour and multiple viewings of the body in 1865, it had been embalmed , then "touched up" multiple times. When they opened the coffin to check in 1901 (feel free to do the math), he was still recognizable.
Jeannie