If Angelique recalled seeing Vicky in 1795, then why didn't Barnabas?

[David]

 

Discuss!

[Nightfall59]

I settled this one in my mind by saying that Barnabas came from the original timeline, the one where Phyllis Wick was the governess hung as a witch. But this version of Angelique was from the altered timeline and, therefore, she knew Vicki.

Works for me. 

[Joeytrom]

When Vicky is lying on the couch after returning from the past, she says something that causes Barnabas to make a face realizing that she did go to 1795.

[MagnusTrask]

Later in 1968, there was a Barnabas/Julia conversation in which he actually does talk about his remembering Vicki in 1795.   Apparently the time line takes a little time to sort itself out, as they once said on the science fiction comedy "Red Dwarf"...

[Gothick]

Yes Magnus, Barnabas has dialogue in that scene that goes something like, "the past is constantly being re-lived, ever changing..." which seems to have become one of the operating mottos for the writers on DS.

G.

[David]

Yes Magnus, Barnabas has dialogue in that scene that goes something like, "the past is constantly being re-lived, ever changing..." which seems to have become one of the operating mottos for the writers on DS.

I often wonder if this line is to give them the freedom to re-write stories, as the did with the two episode 1796 arc at the end of 1897, or if it was to cover their tracks when they goofed!

[Joeytrom]

I often wonder if this line is to give them the freedom to re-write stories, as the did with the two episode 1796 arc at the end of 1897, or if it was to cover their tracks when they goofed!

I think of those two episodes as being a fantasy brought on by the Leviathans to trap Barnabas