Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Gothick

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 »
4066
Current Talk '08 II / Re: eve we hardly knew ye
« on: September 10, 2008, 11:38:27 PM »
I agree totally.  Marie's work in the character of Eve was superb, even though the character herself was so poorly written and they kept changing her backstory, motives, etc.  I wish the original Danielle Roget/Philippe Cordier story had been explored, instead of that ridiculous tripe with Peter Bradford. Poor Marie!

I wish they had explained just what someone like Danielle was doing in Collinsport.  Why wasn't she in NYC with some of the other refugees from the Terror, if that's why she fled France in the first place?  It's really pointless to ask these questions because what seems to have happened is that DC had one of his legendary story conferences in which major storylines were trashed and the show was sent off on some completely different angle. 

G.

4067
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Did David Henesy leave??
« on: September 10, 2008, 10:00:37 PM »
Dear Fans, David Henesy contributed a memoir about his DS days in one of KLS' more recent books.  I think it was Dark Shadows Memories but it may have been the updated version of Dark Shadows Almanac.

If I remember correctly, the memoir was done as a conversation between Henesy and his once-upon-a-time co-star, Denise Nickerson.

G.

4068
Current Talk '08 II / Re: What were they thinking?
« on: September 09, 2008, 10:22:39 PM »
A number of fans have said that they think the original Laura Collins 1966/67 story was DS' finest hour, bar none.  At this point in the scheme of things, I prefer to think of each storyline having its own special merits (and faults), but there's no doubt that the Laura story represented brilliant storytelling for the series, fascinating characterizations (both Laura herself and the established cast), and a payoff that, for once in DS history, gave everything expected from the buildup and that extra bit more.

Vicki's special connection to Josette does become very important during this storyline.  One of the problems with the Barnabas storyline is that they do not bother to explain what happened to Josette's spirit.  Barnabas has one line of dialogue in one of his very first episodes where he sort of banishes the ghost of Josette, which may be why we don't see her during subsequent events--when, to say the least, judging from how she behaves in the Matthew and Laura stories, you'd expect to see her taking a strong role in things.

G.

4069
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Nancy Screengrabs I wanted to share! (Spoilerish)
« on: September 08, 2008, 11:05:52 PM »
Hi Taeylor, those photos of Nancy Barrett are sooo glamorous and also capture her vulnerable edge.  I loved it when she had her hair up in those 1966 shows. 

When Grayson was asked who the best actress on the show was, she said "Nancy Barrett.  Really."  Grayson was particularly impressed by Nancy's flair with the Pansity Cockney accent.  I bet other people on the show were as well, which is why Letitia showed up in 1840.

I met Nancy a couple of times at Festivals in the past decade or so.  One memorable time was at this Manhattan club, Don't tell Mama, where she was doing her cabaret act.  She was extremely gracious but a bit shy, I thought.  I seem to recall that it was there that we were talking about Joan Bennett and she recalled how Joan would look at her suddenly with sheer terror in her eyes because she did not know what she was supposed to say or do next.  Obviously, Joan had nerves of steel because even though I remember the occasional flub, I never saw Joan be anything less than regal, poised, and perfect on camera, and of course, the same goes double for Nancy.

There was a page on the late Craig Hamrick's website 3 or 4 years ago about Nancy (and perhaps Marie as well) doing a performance at a home for retirees.  It was a really nice item.  I haven't kept up with what happened to Craig's site.  Perhaps his partner has been maintaining it.

Best, G.

4070
Thanks for clearing that up, Ms. C!  You are absolutely correct--I confused the Coop with the Harvard Bkstore. 

I'm very impressed with your knowledge of our local booksellers!  Thanks again!

G.

4071
Thanks, Ms. C!  I had not heard of this, and I really appreciate the heads-up.

To Jennifer, if you see this--you might need to get a ticket, either by going to the store, or by signing up via their website.  I'm in Harvard Square right now and if I find out more, I'll post it to this thread.

G.

4072
Calendar Events / Announcements '08 II / Semi OT: Keith Prentice
« on: August 24, 2008, 07:26:56 PM »
Dear Fans,

On Friday, I was able to browse a copy of Boze Hadleigh's newish book, Broadway Babylon.  There are a couple of paragraphs devoted to Keith Prentice in the section of the stage and film productions of Boys in the Band. Nothing was said that was new to me, and I do feel obliged to warn potential readers that Mr. Hadleigh's assertions are not always to be taken as gospel (!) truth. 

The 1969 film of Boys in the Band is being released on DVD this November--a bare bones release without any extras, apparently--and there's a rather grainy copy of an original trailer for the movie now on YouTube.  At least a couple of brief Keith Prentice scenes occur in the trailer, for those who have never seen it. Bear in mind that he did this BEFORE he was on DS.  Hadleigh mentions that Prentice went on to work in another soap after the cancellation of DS--I can't recall which one.

In unrelated news, I'm heading off to spend my annual week at a Farm owned by a lovely gay couple who are friends of mine.  I spend a week living in a tent in a field, well off the grid and far away from phones, computers, and all the rest of the so-called modern conveniences.  HEAVEN.

Still, I'll probably think of some favorite DS scene at least once.  Perhaps while I'm skinny dipping in the pond I'll remember Grayson's scene in End of the Road where Stacey Keach digs her out of the sand at the beach and she giggles in her memorable gurgling drawl and exclaims, "Hi there!"  A bit of summer fun from 40 years ago...

cheers!  G.

4073
Current Talk '08 II / Re: The Inscrutable Nicholas Blair
« on: August 23, 2008, 08:35:56 PM »
I watched the episode earlier this a.m.  Glorioski, but Nicholas was one S-M-O-O-T-H operator.  In fact, footage of him coming on to Maggie could be turned into a music video for that old song about the smooth operator.

I also watched an episode I seem to have missed entirely, although I think I did see it back in '68--when Barnabas is at the House by the Sea trying to persuade Joe to leave--and Angelique nearly attacks Barnabas--but holds off because of Nicky's threats.  Great work all round, especially from Joel and KLS in this one.

G.

4074
Current Talk '08 II / Re: John Seavey’s Storytelling Engines: Angel
« on: August 22, 2008, 07:48:54 PM »
In season 3 of Forever Knight, they did an episode that was an interesting exploration of the whole HIV/AIDS thing and how it could or could not impact vampires.  I think the episode was called "Fever."

G.

4075
Current Talk '08 II / Re: The Inscrutable Nicholas Blair
« on: August 22, 2008, 05:23:09 PM »
Oh wow!  I haven't watched that episode in donkey's ears!  I must, must, MUST (!) revisit!

That t-shirt sounds to die for!  I always loved that line...

Thanks for posting the quote and photos from Robservations!

xo G.

4076
Current Talk '08 II / Re: New Big Finish Dramas
« on: August 22, 2008, 03:46:43 PM »
Stuart, is the script for Clothes of Sand your work?  Congratulations, if so!  I'd heard you had written some of the earlier dramas... I have not been able to catch up with the CD series, unfortunately.

cheers!  Steve

4077
Current Talk '08 II / The Inscrutable Nicholas Blair
« on: August 22, 2008, 03:09:23 PM »
Dear Fans,

Am I the only one who's Bewitched, Bothered and Bewildered by the quote ascribed to Nicholas on today's snapshot?  I thought I knew the 1968 storyline like the back of my hand, but I have total amnesia around this!

Anyone feel like helping out?

I do love and adore Nicholas, especially the 1968 Nicholas--my absolute favorite Humbert Allen Astredo performance, and one of my top favorite characters on the series!  His scenes with Julia rate as among the series' finest moments in my book.

G.

4078
Current Talk '08 II / Re: John Seavey’s Storytelling Engines: Angel
« on: August 21, 2008, 10:17:25 PM »
They never discussed in the DS scripts whether or not Barnabas had a soul when he was a vampire.  Perhaps the idea of a vampire lacking a soul comes from Miss Rice?  It may exist in some of the old Eastern European folklore collected by "Reverence" Montague Summers back in the 1920s.  Many indigenous or pre-Christian thought systems treat what we would call the "soul" as having three components.  Due to traumas of various kinds (includes being the victim of a hex/curse), part of this tripartite "soul" can be ripped away.  If what remains includes the original physical body imbued with some form of life force, this can behave like someone possessed or like "one of the living dead."  I won't go on because I am getting into off topic waters here.

To me, the way the Angel character was handled on Buffy (from what I saw of it) was very different from how Barnabas was portrayed on DS.  Of course, I'm sure that there was some awareness of Barnabas and DS in the mix on the part of the people who worked on the show.  Has Joss Whedon ever mentioned the series in interviews?

G.

4079
Current Talk '08 II / Re: New Big Finish Dramas
« on: August 21, 2008, 05:41:50 PM »
Thanks, Quentin, for those fascinating reviews.  The title Clothes of Sand is a poignant one for such a story, and must surely be taken from the song by the late Nick Drake:

Can you now return to from where you came
Try to burn your changing name
Or with silver spoons and coloured light
Will you worship moons in winter's night.

Clothes of sand have covered your face
Given you meaning but taken my place
So make your way on down to the sea
Something has taken you so far from me.

It is nice that Maggie was given her own story in the second one.  I was watching some of the PT 1970 episodes two evenings ago and more impressed by KLS' performance than I had remembered. 

Best, G.

4080
Perhaps I should have said that comparisons, *as a class*, tend towards the invidious.  I was speaking more generally as regards criticism--not specifically stating that 1991 was invariably the loser in a comparison with the 1966 original (even if that IS what I personally think).

I know that having had the pleasure *winces* of seeing the trailer for the remake of The Women (a 1939 classic) yesterday, I can bet dollars to doughnuts that many of the reviewers of the new production will have their nails sharpened with the most lurid "jungle red" (as was said in the original) as they merrily shred the performances of Meg Ryan et al.

G.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 »