1
Current Talk '25 I / Re: WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: March 09, 2023, 02:06:24 AM »
Is the version that was shown at the Festival available anywhere?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
If you tell me the file size of the PDF you'd like to post, I can adjust the forum's size limit.
Thanks MB. I tried to post a PDF of the pages, but I'm told that the file is too big. How are you posting your files?Are you planning to share the Cinefantastique review? I have it, but don't want to steal your thunder as they say. Please let me know if you want me to post it.
Certainly feel free to post anything you might like, The Doctor and K9.I do have several more things in line to post, but with the exception of one, I have no set plans how or when to post them. And given some of the gems you've already shared elsewhere on the forum, it's quite possible you may have something I don't have.
Continuing with Angelique on the stairs shots, here's a rare version:Are you planning to share the Cinefantastique review? I have it, but don't want to steal your thunder as they say. Please let me know if you want me to post it.- though, oddly, the top is a bit cropped.
While I looked for more versions of Angelique on the stairs for yet another post, I discovered I do have an uncropped version of the still - but because the fully uncropped Angelique shows up in the other copies I've posted, I'm not going to bother to scan it and replace the version I posted.
And BTW, lest anyone think that there won't be any more things posted in this topic except for quotes from the slideshow, I can assure there's plenty more to come. It's just that this week I've been busy with other things and haven't had the time to prepare anything more for posting. But definitely look for things next week...Fantastic! Thank you!
To summarize, it's a decent read. But the $10.50 price tag struck me as a bit much.
That's true, I didn't think of that.You know, I also thought about giving the writer that excuse as a possibility. But then I ruled it out because the writer thought Jackson wasn't even on DS, so he/she wouldn't have had her DS character in mind when he/she wrote the blurb...
I know absolutely that I have a magazine blurb for NoDS that identifies Kate Jackson as Kate Harrington, .....But while Kate Harrington did do soaps in the early '70s, she's something like 30 years older than Jackson. How they could be confused is beyond reasonable understandingI wonder if the confusion had to do with Kate Jackson playing Daphne Harridge, which is at least somewhat close to Harrington.
Since the restoration of NODS is still grinding its wheels, maybe Big Finish could do an audio drama of the complete script?
Given the way that things turned out, any Joan Bennett footage would have probably ended up on the cutting room floor.You're probably right. Maybe her scenes would have been enough incentive to restore the film.