Back to black and white. Somebody should have told Vicky that she didn't need to hide her unsightly dress from the camera today.
Julia is fabulous: she still thinks she can come out of the business with a whole skin
and her license to practise medicine intact! It really makes you wonder what sort of shenanigans she's pulled in the past.
Apparently it was considered unnecessary to mention exactly where Sam was when he should have been drowning his sorrows at the Blue Whale. Barnabas said on Friday that he would go look for Sam, but instead he went after Julia, so who found Sam? My mind keeps going back to a Caption This capture that MB put up a few weeks ago:
Complete this phrase: "Joe positively could not believe that somehow Sam, his girlfriend's father (
), had talked him into driving him to..."
And so we're back to Maggie as Maggie. The vampire victim is gone, and the hysterical girl who regressed to childhood is gone. It's a superb job of hypnotism on Julia's part, especially when you consider that it was done on the fly, with no advance preparation. Question: is Maggie better off not remembering? The memory question is asked in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, and the answer in that movie was, "No, memories should not be erased." Is the answer different here? Did Maggie learn anything out of this experience that could be helpful to her later on in life? Is there any way that Julia (assuming Julia didn't have ulterior, exterior motives) could work with Maggie to make the memories of her ordeal bearable?
