DARK SHADOWS FORUMS
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
December 21, 2025, 08:56:40 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
405294
Posts in
84442
Topics by
993
Members
Latest Member:
syoung
DARK SHADOWS FORUMS
General Discussions
Current Talk '25 I
Current Talk Archive
Current Talk '07 I
(Moderators:
Midnite
,
dom
)
Do you think that DS was more spooky in blcak and white.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
«
1
2
Author
Topic: Do you think that DS was more spooky in blcak and white. (Read 2580 times)
petofi
Full A ed Newest Fervor Post
Full Poster
Karma: +9158/-13247
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 320
" Collinwood '68 - Fashions courtesy of Ohrbach's"
Re: Do you think that DS was more spooky in blcak and white.
«
Reply #15 on:
February 17, 2007, 06:56:01 PM »
I found two of the creepiest, most atmospheric episodes I ever saw were not only in black and white, but one was kinescoped as well. They are episodes #260 and #261, when, [spoiler]at the tail-end of the kinescoped #260, Maggie escapes from Barnabas into the subterranian labyrinth beneath the Old House. Through the shadows, Barnabas slowly pursues, shouting how Maggie can never escape. The chase continues in #261, which is B/W videotape, and we see not only the shadowy tunnels below OH, but the beach at the base of Widow's Hill, as well! The difference between B/W and kinescope can really be seen between these eps, though they are both very spooky![/spoiler]
I thoroughly enjoyed the later color, but I agree with some of the other posters that earlier color eps were at times washed out, with too much front-on white light wash in them. 1897 had a lot more of the depth and shadow of the earlier black and white episodes, though some of the 1967 night scenes (in Eagle Hill Cemetery, for example) were pretty good, too.
Petofi
Logged
Pages:
«
1
2
« previous
next »