12091
Current Talk '02 II / Re: The most eee-vil WOMAN of the Eighteenth Century!
« on: August 09, 2002, 02:03:17 AM »Quote
It occurred to me how great it would have been to summon the spirit of SUKI FORBES instead of "Danielle Roget," if they intended to milk the 1795 connection. It would have been equally interesting to have Suki play not only the life force but the body host as well. A great way not only for a new connection to 1795, but for more involvement w/Joe Haskell, who Suki might see as Nathan Forbes. Jane Draper was so enjoyable as Suki it's a shame they never brought her back.
I was thinking the exact same thing, Chris! As I watched the materialization of Danni Ragu I kept picturing the Suki Forbes character (especially in that dress) and about how it would have been great to use Jane Draper again. I never got as far as you though regarding the 1795 connection. You are very clever.
dom