Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - B.Collins

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »
166
Current Talk '11 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0004
« on: July 06, 2011, 05:35:54 AM »
you know in these early episodes i don't like the characer "Roger" cause he's a terrible father. & a terrible human being as well. [spoiler]though he did end up later carring for David. who also in the early episodes what another one that i didn't like.

cause on how immature he also was. you tend to wonder why they didn't send him to a shrink than & not until much later? odd huh?[/spoiler] sorry i'm geting a big head of the episodes. i'm just thinking aloud i guess. one thing that's also great about "Vicki" in these early episodes

was she didn't say 'I don't understand" that much i'm curious on how many times she ended up DID saying it! & even more curious on "Alexandra M." response when she read the next script & what her response was!

167
"Manhunt" is a good one. i can't recall what other ones i've seen her in. but in that one she works with the late & great "John Carradine" back before his roles turned out well.... you all know how HIS Carreer sadly went to.

it started around that time actually. Fox i believe ruined his career. anyways, as for "Susperia"

i may be the only one here he he. who thinks that movie is SIMPLY TERRIBLE!

i love "Joan Bennet' & the great "Udo Kier" who is also in it. but that film simply bored me out of my bloody mind! yes i've watched it a few times to give it a chance. & i still feel the same way. it's a well filmed movie. granted, but the story moves along at a snails pace.

168
That's neat that the WP is starting to watch from Episode #1, and the days coincide exactly with how they were in 1966! [ghost_grin]

yes it is, though i'm watching wise well i'm a LOT farther than that. episode #352 i  believe. ya know, each time i come on here. this little project where we discuss each episode is NEVER on track to where I am during the series. !  [ghost_cheesy]


it's either to early on in the show. or to late. but NEVER in the right area! am i the only one this happens too?

169
Current Talk '11 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0002
« on: July 01, 2011, 04:41:00 AM »
to my best of knowledge it stayed with the number of 40 rooms. you know i don't normally think about if they actually Do clean the house like Liz says they do. but i can't see David doing much of anything when it comes to cleaning. his room yes.

but in these early episodes he was kid you just wanted to hit upside the head cause on how much of a little runt to keep it clean he was in these episodes. I can see Carolyn helping out with the house during the day of course. but i can't see Liz doing it cause on how she normally dresses. on how fancy she dresses i mean, i can't see her doing much dusting or

as you said vacumming. sorry for my spelling. Vicki i can see cleaning of course. Roger NEVER i can hear him say i WON"T HAVE ANY OF THAT! or something along those lines. he he. i think it also would have been interesting had they done had more people stay there at least during a sweeps week so those rooms could be filled. but than all of would prolly look the same. cause on how little budget they were able to use per episode. what i'm trying to say is i think it would have been fun to see the house with more people it in at least for a short time.

like have them throw a  party or something. anyways one question what episode does Liz start to wear that key? each time i watch these early episodes i try & pay attention to notice it. but i than get so entranced with the show that
i completely  forget about it!

i also try & pay attention on how many episodes one nite can actually takes place in. an example would be the 1st episode which takes place for a couple of them at the very least. if not a few of them perhaps?

170
booty call. sorry i just could NOT resist that. he he

171
Current Talk '11 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0004
« on: July 01, 2011, 02:59:57 AM »
i know i think they destroyed a LOT of what "Vicki" originally became i think she had more of a brain in her head than she did later on. & i loved the fact that she stood up to herself. but than i think they forgot at some point that she was a good character at some point. i dunno.

172
Current Talk '10 II / Re: Sarah Collins
« on: June 29, 2011, 01:59:52 AM »
honestly, i think it would have been interesting IF she had returned after he turned good. even IF it was only for one or two episodes. it would have let us viewers & Barnabas know that she sees he's doing good now. & is proud of him. or something along the lines of that. i realize the actress grew to fast. but i don't think one or two episodes would really have mattered much. cause if you think about it

i doubt anyone would have really thought much of her growing back than. i can't honestly tell but than i also don't really think about it either. so there ya go ya know? he he

173
thanxs for the update

174
Current Talk '11 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0002
« on: June 29, 2011, 01:15:29 AM »
you know it's funny that she would say that, when we NEVER really did see anyone BUT "Matthew" or "Mrs. Johnson" later do the work around the house.

175
Current Talk '10 II / Re: Sarah Collins
« on: January 02, 2011, 07:09:58 AM »
true, but i do like the re-incarnation theory. lord knows Caroline was pretty much a re-incarnation of wasn't it "Pasny Faye" ?

176
Calendar Events / Announcements '10 II / Re: The Vampire Diaries
« on: December 10, 2010, 03:08:09 AM »
tonite's was good. who is this guy that plays that vamp that i thought was going to take Elena. it's funny how she gets blocked into her house. which i think was funny as hell. than he just shows up!

too funny. & i am grateful that the cliff-hanger wasn't major like i thought it would have been.

177
Current Talk '10 II / Re: Sarah Collins
« on: December 06, 2010, 10:01:26 PM »
thanxs for posting what she actually says, i couldn't honestly remember, i was actually trying to but i haven't watched the episode for awhile so bear with me. anyways, i think at some point in (1968) she should have come back even if it was just one episode.  i also never noticed she grew to be quite honest.


why did she send Vicki to the past anyways? it may sound like a stupid question to some, but she never DID learn who Barnabas truly was. that he was a vampire & etc.. yes she met him as a human & liked him very much. but she never did put two & two together.

neither did any of the family for that matter. not  counting "Carolynn" cause since he bit her. plus she never told
anyone anyways, i also would like have if they had her also trying to stop things from happening instead of her

going back to normal after the curse was lifted. i always did like when Barnabas would involve the entire family on in on his plans for stopping whatever threat was going on instead of course when he was the threat. anyways, as for the past, does anyone wonder what kind of tutor Vicki well governess i mean,  Vicki was suppose to be? i mean when it comes to history of course, cause she could teach her about what happens 100 years from then, or hell even 50 years.  but since not a lot in history since there's so much of it

NOW has happend at least in (1795) wouldn't it be kinda of hard for her to think of what happened before that year?  odd question i realize that but   also a bit funny if you think about it.

178
Current Talk '10 II / Re: Today's Robservations Slideshow
« on: December 05, 2010, 02:07:32 AM »
if you really think about it, when the 1st started Burke was really the main plot. yes there were others. & after he confronted Roger, he was pretty much background Material. yes they wrote a relationship in where he does eventually hook up with Vicki. but other than that he wasn't really the focal point anymore for some weird reason.


i don't think it had anything to do with "Mitchell Ryan" getting fired. this is just how it feels to me. my guess is they pretty much ran out of idea's of what to do with him? so they killed him off. yes i realize that "Anthony George" only had what  a 6 months contract wasn't it? or something like that. anyways,

that's my guess why they didn't keep the character at the very least. also that's my guess why they pretty much stopped the Mrs. Johnson Angle as well. i think they prolly felt both things had run it's course. which


makes sense to be honest. but the downside is they didn't come up with another good storyline really for either character.  if you also recall that Mrs. Johnson even later at some point also dissapeared as well.
sorry for my bad spelling he he. anyways, she at 1st just showed up less, than none at all until we see her in (1995) than never again at all. my guess "Clarice Blackburn" contract ran up as well. & just worked

when needed i guess i dunno? & thanxs for letting know about screen caps. i was curious as well. i recall watching my Old VHS tapes & than when i 1st started buying the dvd's i DID notice the difference on the picture/sound etc.. but thanxs for letting me know. i was just curious that's all

179
Current Talk '10 II / Re: Sarah Collins
« on: December 05, 2010, 01:55:04 AM »
true she is still a child. & also i find it funny as hell that David who has an obsession for ghosts, NEVER once considered that Sarah was a ghost. when Barny 1st showed up at the old house & they 1st met. he thought

he was a ghost. it's funny how it occurs to Sam & Joe almost a the same time really, that Sarah's a ghost. but David who loves ghosts. doesn't once think that's what she is. i'm sorry i just find that funny.

anyways, as for Sarah i realize that she has a child mindset but you would think that at some point she's say to herself don't tell or show him this. may it be in real life, well real as it can be on DS or in dreams. i never did like the fact that Barny was going to kill a 9 year old boy. Maggie i get & Burke i get. but to want to kill your own family?  if  you think about it sometimes adults don't always believe kids.

& we know Vicki always was in denial about Barnabas. at least that's how if feels to me. it's also how nobody really asked barnabas where goes during the day? other than a couple people. anyways that's for a different topic though, sorry i'm just thinking aloud.

anyways back to Sarah, what the writers SHOULD have done & what would have been nice is after the return from (1795) have Sarah stay on the show for a bit longer. even if it was just a couple of weeks. give Barnabas some closure at the very least. after she told me she wouldn't appear to him until he turned good.

which is basically what she said. if memory serves me right. anyways, he did turn good after that well after the return from (1795) i mean. what with the Adam & Eve storyline. & all that. anyways. it would have been nice to see Sarah talk to ole Barny one last time at the very least. to say goodbye.  since she didn't have that when she originally died.

my guess "Sharon Smyth's" contract just ran up so they chose not to go that way. i wonder why she didn't do anymore acting after doing "DS" ? anyways what do you think?

180
Current Talk '10 II / Sarah Collins
« on: December 04, 2010, 09:41:40 AM »
1st let me say that if this is in the wrong section i'm sorry about that. anyways having said that. my question really is quite simple. I've been watching me some "DS" as of late.


& i'm on Episode #326 i believe? anyways, basically storyline where David is afraid of ole Barny,

which is a good storyline i'm not denying or saying it isn't. but my question is really, Sarah is a ghost that's quite obvious. but if she was there to save Maggie's Life. & David's for example ok i can see that. & get that. but why in the hell would she tell him the truth about Barnabas?

the poor kid is scared enough as it is. you would think that she would try & steer him away from barnabas. & not being afraid of him. warning him i can understand.but showing him as a vampire even if it's in just a dream. is at least in "DS" world the truth of things that is going on. or something like that.

has anyone ever thought about this? or is this just me?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 »