I'd love to see the pilot again-- the one Gerard mentioned.   I think it was called Night Strangler.  Or did you mean The Night Stalker movie?  I'm so confused.  The former had a little "Dracula", a little "Jekyll and Hyde", and a little "Dorian Grey" added to its story, plus I enjoyed the cast more, but the latter was the better movie, methinks.  Anyway, does anyone know if SciFi or another cable station airs them?

That LP ep was pretty campy, though it was fun seeing her in it.  But I was a loyal fan to that series, same as I was to X-Files when it was on.  Whotta surprise. 

I think it lasted a couple of seasons, Eleanor_R.

All my mailing lists are very quiet too.  Well, all 3 of them, anyway. 

Has anyone else had a problem staying focused on the show lately?  I did perk up when Roger Collins had the little fireside chat with Angelexis (as only PT Roger can), and again today when Karlen and Barrett showed up, and yet again when Frid was on the screen.  HoDS shmods, they were missed!

Afan,

Click profile in the horizontal menu at the top or bottom.

Carefully fill in the first blank space with your Current Password.

NEXT, Scroll down to where it says Personalized Picture and highlight the image you want (you can see what each looks like by clicking on it)

     OR

     Check the box following I have my own pic: and type in the URL of the image.  The image must be stored on a website and one you have permission from the site owner to link to, and it has to be a gif or jpg that's no larger than 82X86.

Change your Personal Text.

Click Change profile to save these changes.

You'll now have a new avatar and personal message.

LOL, just seeing the latest switcheroo.  MB, you're evil. 

MB...if one knew the above; where/how could one use it within computers?

Like if I typed the hexadecimal value for khaki, instead of word khaki, what would happen?

Patti,

If you click quote in Minja's reply (#11) in this thread and take a look at the code that displays in your response window, you'll have your answer.

But in this current version of the forums, it's more important that the 2nd set of codes mirror the first.

[text=cornflowerblue]testing testing[/cornflowerblue]

(what would happen on here if I put the corresponding code instead of word color??
Patti

hmmm...why no cornflowerblue available???

It is available, but that's what happens when you experiment with the codes.

Incorrect:[text=cornflowerblue]testing testing[/cornflowerblue]correct:[color=cornflowerblue]testing testing[/color]

Go Girlfriend

the WORDS go & girlfriend = 12 characters; wasn't sure about spacing in between.

Just count characters.  Or you can enter 300-- that always works me for me-- so this[glow=red,3,300]TEXT[/glow] comes out TEXT

When i did my little test. . there was no one else about. . i didn't say I just did it. .hence I wasn't necessarily wrong...  but i see people are wedded to their beliefs on this and what i know to be technologically possible doesn't matter a bit.  So let's just conclude this conversation and topic.   

I misunderstood when you did the test.  But I contend that use of the feature is cumulative; doling out 1 cure or curse does not earn 1 of the same unless you had already accumulated karma for using the feature, and then you start accumulating all over again with the next one.  To see a total number of members online, you have to return to the main page, then to cure or curse someone you have to find their post or their profile, and in the case of the latter you'd have to view their recent messages and then open one of those posts in order to use the feature.  Then to check your own karma totals, you have to open your own profile or one of your own posts.  In that time, you wouldn't have any way of viewing a count of hidden members without returning to the main page.

I agree that this is getting us nowhere, and I will lock this topic per your request once I've had my say.  If you had access to the karma scripts for the forums and I disagreed with what you'd seen with your own eyes, then your insinuation that I'm foolishly "wedded to ... beliefs" would make sense.  And I did not say that what you've said isn't technologically possible; I said that it's not the way the karma feature currently works, and I've been hearing every word you and others have said about the feature so telling me that what you say doesn't matter a bit to me is unfounded.