Okay folks, if no one else will do it, leave it to me.Â
I've been glaring at this topic for two days wondering what the f*ck it means.Â
I haven't really heard of anyone calling anyone else a "lovemaker" since around 1897. So, in the 21st century, what do we really mean, when we refer to a woman (or a group of women) as a lovemaker(s)??Â
What the Hell is a "lovemaker?"
Aren't we really asking, "which chick would be hottest in the sack?" And if so, why not just come right-out and ask? This isn't 1897, after all.
To be honest -- and not trying to be offensive, but Hell -- this has got to be the strangest, most sexist post I have ever seen on the message board. And I am not even a chick.
Does it really take a gay-boy to recognize blatant sexism when he see it?Â
Back to the topic -- I'd vote for Chris or Quentin. Now those dudes would be great "lovemakers."
WTF??
Various remarks....
Yet one more reason for me to hate the twenty-first century.
This is pretty obviously either a sexist post, or one that just angrily denies the concept or possibilty of anything but mechanical sex. I'm angry over the way society's going, over how shallow and mindless and thoughtless it's getting, and the fact that I don't see anything coming along to stop it. I try very hard to avoid getting (extremely) bitterly disillusioned, to the point where I lash out at any implication that there might be real emotion or passion in the world, just because i don't find it in the world. Which I don't. But if I let myself be turned into a hostile jerk over it, the other side wins and I personally lose more than I could ever express in words.
Now I'll look at how other people responded to this.