541
Calendar Events / Announcements '14 I / Re: NBC releases 'Rosemary's Baby' teaser
« on: May 16, 2014, 02:48:23 AM »
the trailer was singularly unimpressive...
I smell a total dud.![[easter_rolleyes]](http://www.dsboards.com/SMF/Smileys/classic/easter_rolleyes.gif "Roll Eyes")
I smell a total dud.
News:
by a streaming service? KLS thinks so!
Be sure to check out: KLS talks to Soaps.com
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 »
542
Current Talk '14 I / Re: A. Moltke in 1897
« on: May 11, 2014, 04:30:37 PM »
do tell mysterious...
what happened with Marie and HODS???
what happened with Marie and HODS???
543
Current Talk '14 I / Re: A. Moltke in 1897
« on: May 11, 2014, 11:40:32 AM »
perhaps...
but by the time she would have available to return to work in 1970, as the been said, the storyline had moved in drastically different directions.
and who knows by that point Curtis might have already had his eye on winding the whole thing down and it just wasn't worth the trouble.
but by the time she would have available to return to work in 1970, as the been said, the storyline had moved in drastically different directions.
and who knows by that point Curtis might have already had his eye on winding the whole thing down and it just wasn't worth the trouble.
544
Current Talk '14 I / Re: A. Moltke in 1897
« on: May 11, 2014, 03:43:37 AM »
if you interview her again you should ask her.
545
Current Talk '14 I / Re: A. Moltke in 1897
« on: May 11, 2014, 03:25:15 AM »If Alexandra had a five year contract, why didn't DC file suit and force her to return?
Not a nice thing to do, but he sounds like the kind of aggressive go-getter who would have done exactly that.
who know the legal logistics of that situation? she was let out of her contract and that appeared to be the end of it.
546
Current Talk '14 I / Re: A. Moltke in 1897
« on: May 10, 2014, 09:30:57 PM »
I always thought of Vicki-Carolyn-Maggie as the series' "ingénue trinity". a sisterhood of sorts...
when Vicki left that dynamic was broken irrevocably for me. there was always a void.
when Vicki left that dynamic was broken irrevocably for me. there was always a void.
547
Current Talk '14 I / Re: A. Moltke in 1897
« on: May 10, 2014, 04:26:29 PM »
I don't really understand the prevailing "either/or" line of thinking on this subject within the fanbase...
that somehow *if* Alexandra had not left the series than somehow that meant less, or even nothing, for KLS. Vicki and Maggie coexisted nicely for years. would Maggie have been taken on as Collinwood governess? no. probably not as long as Vicki was still around.
but there were LOTS of other storyline possibilities for both characters. and really, with her association with Josette being what it was KLS was pretty much guaranteed permanent employment in all time periods if she wanted it.
that somehow *if* Alexandra had not left the series than somehow that meant less, or even nothing, for KLS. Vicki and Maggie coexisted nicely for years. would Maggie have been taken on as Collinwood governess? no. probably not as long as Vicki was still around.
but there were LOTS of other storyline possibilities for both characters. and really, with her association with Josette being what it was KLS was pretty much guaranteed permanent employment in all time periods if she wanted it.
548
Calendar Events / Announcements '14 I / Re: See a super-creepy 'Penny Dreadful' trailer
« on: May 10, 2014, 03:52:23 PM »
I loved the scene where eva was reading josh's tarot cards.
549
Current Talk '14 I / Re: A. Moltke in 1897
« on: May 10, 2014, 02:28:20 AM »
you don't like the character...
we get it.
we get it.
550
Current Talk '14 I / Re: A. Moltke in 1897
« on: May 09, 2014, 09:52:28 PM »
despite Dan Curtis' insistence that he'd *only* use Alexandra as Vicki the fact remains that she had a five year contract...
SO he would have had to find something for her to do for the remainder of the series had she not departed under the circumstances that she did. just randomly plunking her down in all these different time periods would have stopped making sense at some point(Vicki in 1840???)so the story would have ended up being structured differently *or* he'd have had to relent and write a new role for her.
it's just the logistics of the situation.
SO he would have had to find something for her to do for the remainder of the series had she not departed under the circumstances that she did. just randomly plunking her down in all these different time periods would have stopped making sense at some point(Vicki in 1840???)so the story would have ended up being structured differently *or* he'd have had to relent and write a new role for her.
it's just the logistics of the situation.
551
Calendar Events / Announcements '14 I / Re: See a super-creepy 'Penny Dreadful' trailer
« on: May 09, 2014, 11:42:30 AM »
I was impressed by how "overstuffed" it was...
obviously I knew vampires were part of the story and then at the end when the doctor introduced himself as "Frankenstein". but it was so cacophonous. the busy Victorian setting certainly heightened the effect.
in that it sort of reminded me of AHS. season 2 threw in everything but the kitchen sink from alien abduction to demonic possession to Nazi war criminals. do we just suffer from collective attention deficit disorder today and can no longer follow a single thread story?![[easter_embarassed]](http://www.dsboards.com/SMF/Smileys/classic/easter_embarassed.gif "Embarrassed")
obviously I knew vampires were part of the story and then at the end when the doctor introduced himself as "Frankenstein". but it was so cacophonous. the busy Victorian setting certainly heightened the effect.
in that it sort of reminded me of AHS. season 2 threw in everything but the kitchen sink from alien abduction to demonic possession to Nazi war criminals. do we just suffer from collective attention deficit disorder today and can no longer follow a single thread story?
552
Calendar Events / Announcements '14 I / Re: See a super-creepy 'Penny Dreadful' trailer
« on: May 09, 2014, 01:24:59 AM »
just caught the first episode...
it's still too early for me to formulate an opinion. it's not really my "genre" so I'm not sure what to think about it. but it was engaging enough that i'll continue to check it out.
it's still too early for me to formulate an opinion. it's not really my "genre" so I'm not sure what to think about it. but it was engaging enough that i'll continue to check it out.
553
Current Talk '14 I / Re: Terry Crawford
« on: May 08, 2014, 08:30:40 PM »
interesting...
like eve and jenny I've just always associated megan with marie. but terry would have put an interesting spin on it.
like eve and jenny I've just always associated megan with marie. but terry would have put an interesting spin on it.
554
Current Talk '14 I / Re: Terry Crawford
« on: May 08, 2014, 03:54:40 PM »
I guess including the time Crawford played a ghost in 1969 it was about a year she was continuously onscreen...
perhaps she was brought back as a "day player" for edith in 1840. she was only in a few episodes.
perhaps she was brought back as a "day player" for edith in 1840. she was only in a few episodes.
555
Current Talk '14 I / Re: Terry Crawford
« on: May 08, 2014, 01:22:36 PM »
true. it would appear that no part existed for terry in the "present"...
still it would have been fun seeing her in a fall and a mini. I gather she was not under contract?
still it would have been fun seeing her in a fall and a mini. I gather she was not under contract?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 »