Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - michael c

2101
Current Talk '08 I / Re: 1840 storyline....love it or hate it?
« on: April 01, 2008, 10:22:04 PM »
i didn't love or hate 1840.i was just indifferent to it.

in fact i couldn't even get through it all.it just started to bore me.

starting with the 'summer of 1970' episodes the show started to feel warmed over to me.it had lost much of it's freshness and originality.

i always enjoy a switch to a new time period with it's corresponding change of characters,sets and costumes but a few weeks into 1840 it ran out of steam for me and i felt like alot of the actors(especially grayson and jonathan)seemed sort of worn out.

that's just my take on it.no offense to those who enjoyed this storyline.

2102
Calendar Events / Announcements '08 I / Re: DS As "Ditko-esque"
« on: April 01, 2008, 06:26:33 PM »
speaking of comics...

i don't talk about d.s. with my friends as much as i did a few years ago when i first got into it.

so a few weeks ago i had a birthday and a friend told me he had seen a d.s. comic book somewhere and thought about getting it for me but then thought maybe i "wasn't into it anymore". [ghost_blink]

he got me a dvd of the bette davis film 'of human bondage' instead(still a nice gift).

2103
Current Talk '08 I / Re: DS Repetition....
« on: April 01, 2008, 04:09:49 AM »
poor sam evans...

he suffers debilitating injuries at the hands of both of roger's crazy wives(laura and cassandra).

and both times it involves something to do with one of sam's paintings(note to all collinsport area artists...do not paint a portrait of mrs.roger collins!).

2104
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Needlessly harsh behavior by 1897 Barnabas
« on: March 27, 2008, 12:58:51 AM »
please don't get me wrong because i love,love,love diana millay as laura collins and would have relished her inclusion in any storyline however...

i always found her presence in 1897 to be odd and even slightly uneccessary.she wasn't the key player like she had been in 1966.the storyline was clearly about quentin and the werewolf curse and later on the whole petofi thing gets going.laura was actually only around for about two months of a nine month storyline.it seems like the plot would have worked out the same with or without laura's presence in the end.

plus since the show had not been particularly highly rated during the first laura story it's strange to think that they needed barnabas' reaction to her to reigister the same "shock" as the viewers because so many 1897 viewers were new to the show.that said it was a nice bit of continuity to recognize that laura had been a part of the show from the early days.

2105
Current Talk '08 I / Re: the dinner party
« on: March 26, 2008, 10:40:11 PM »
there were lots of similarly odd exchanges between vicki and burke in these early days...many of them oddly written making them seem even weirder.

but there was supposed to be this sort of push-pull dynamic coming from the both of them.they were sort of each other's forbidden fruit.they knew their mutual attraction was "wrong" according to what their personal agendas were and thus acted very awkwardly around each other for a long time.

but i guessed from the first scene at the train station that a hook-up was inevitable.

2106
Current Talk '08 I / Re: the dinner party
« on: March 25, 2008, 02:07:42 PM »
While I really enjoyed the early episodes, having not seen them until after being very familiar with the rest of the show, I can't tell how they would hold up on their own.  I don't know if they are very good just coming into them "cold," or if already knowing these characters makes their earlier story interesting.

as someone who watched the series from the first episode(on video)i can say that for me this part of the show held up very well on it's own...sort of a sleepy gothic soap that had it's own pitch that was unique.

very different from what comes later on but worth watching in it's own right.

it's also a great introduction to characters who later on become more one-dimensional. 

2107
Current Talk '08 I / Re: the dinner party
« on: March 24, 2008, 01:42:38 AM »
garth,

it's actually a two-episode situation.numbers 60 and 61.

bon appetite!

2108
Current Talk '08 I / the dinner party
« on: March 23, 2008, 11:03:05 PM »
i always thought i had seen all of the pre-barnabas episodes but i must have missed a few way back when because on "the beginning collection two" dvd i came across several i had never seen.

there in one episode where maggie invites vicki over for dinner at her house and burke(at this point still fuming over the whole manslaughter business)crashes the festivities and really puts a damper on the whole evening.it's a very weird scene.

i know burke is supposed to have this big chip on the shoulder at this point(and i usually like mitch ryan)but he really comes across as a horrible bully in this scene!

he lashes out at sam(natch)but sam is a grown man and the folks up at the 'big house' with their money and influence can handle devlin's shenanigans but i really felt bad for maggie and vicki in this episode.
all maggie wanted to do was invite her new freind over and vicki(who is enduring no end of torment from her employers at this time)just wanted an evening away from those crazies and perhaps learn something about herself in the process.they both seem so upset.finally a dejected maggie sighs and says "i'd better turn the stove off" and the whole evening is ruined thanks to burke. [easter_sad]

now considering the types of catastrophes that befall these two lasses in later years(you know,being attacked by vampires,sent back in time,hanged for witchcraft,that sort of thing...)a ruined dinner ain't that bad but in the early episodes they seemed more like real people(not charicatures)and thus were easier to sympathise with.at the risk of sounding like a total freak this scene nearly moved me to tears! [easter_rolleyes]

2109
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Jeff Clark = Ned Stuart?
« on: March 23, 2008, 10:25:48 PM »
sometimes it means something when two characters resemble each other(peter bradford=jeff clark,angelique=cassandra)and sometimes it doesn't...

the fact that jeff and ned stuart looked and acted exactly alike was simply the usual case of roger davis being cast whenever possible.ned in no way factored into the whole peter/jeff plotline. [easter_tongue]

2110
i forgot to add this...

for another odd review of the early episodes check out a site called "the blunt review:by emily blunt".

http://www.bluntreview.com/reviews/dark.htm


it gets alot of details super-wrong but it's fun.

2111
i adore the first year as well.i really appreciate the massive presence of joan bennett in the early episodes.later on sometimes her character disappears for weeks at a time.

funny.i can watch the first year sort of like a regular soap opera.i can put in on in the background while i do chores around the house.

the post-barnabas episodes i watch more like i'm watching a movie.i watch at night curled up on the couch under a blanket.

2112
great review...

it's good to see the PEN PLOT getting it's due.

a pen.an automobile accident.a dispute over the ownership of a cannery.the first year was something else!

2113
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Favorite ending to an episode....
« on: March 19, 2008, 06:25:40 PM »
"I killed Paul Stoddard- and that man was my accomplice!"

"Good evening, Barnabas Collins.  I've been waiting for you for a long time- a very long time."

i'm with charles on these two endings.they're the stuff of goosebumps.

i also agree with gerard's two choices.the sceance that sends vicki back in time is an all time favorite(despite that pesky boom in the shot)as well as the camera panning through an empty collinwood to quentin's theme.again goosebumps.

i'm also quite fond of the scene with vicki screaming as she and carolyn spot a certain body floating in the water at the bottom of widow's hill.

and of course the episode that ends with josette's ghost running around the columns at the old house...goosebumps!

2114
Calendar Events / Announcements '08 I / Re: Semi-O.T...1840 and 1970
« on: March 16, 2008, 07:02:38 PM »
i believe that in an attempt to update 'masterpiece theater' and perhaps bring in a younger audience they have dispenced with some old gentleman narrator sitting in some book filled study and brought in gillian anderson of 'x-files' fame to host the program.

i think they might have even changed the name somewhat.

b.t.w. to this day my mother swears that 'upstairs,downstairs' was the best television show she ever watched.

2115
Calendar Events / Announcements '08 I / Re: Semi-O.T...1840 and 1970
« on: March 16, 2008, 02:17:03 AM »
mysterious,

glad to give the heads up.however my friend's partner is an entertainment writer and gets advanced copies of all sorts of films for review so i'm not sure when and where this dvd collection will be available.

i had not heard of margaret tyzack but you're right...she is indeed a revelation as bette.helen mirren is still a bit "green" in this production but she has the enormous presence of someone destined for great things.

i hope you find it!