Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - michael c

1996
Current Talk '08 II / Re: polyester lovetowel
« on: August 06, 2008, 01:35:13 PM »
such discusions generally do not take place at this board.it's generally a more refined place.

and i'm not sure how "impressed" i am with myself for starting such a debauched topic(and it's not without a certain amount of regret)but it just popped into my head and the imagery struck me as funny.

actually there was a conversation about underpants a few weeks back that got a bit loose.

1997
Current Talk '08 II / Re: polyester lovetowel
« on: August 06, 2008, 04:33:40 AM »
by this point in the storyline adam was anything but innocent...

besides innocence and,well you know,are not mutally exclusive.lots of people do it(quel scandale!)and it doesn't make them total pervs.

perhaps even artificially created monsters. [ghost_shocked]

1998
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss - Ep #0583
« on: August 05, 2008, 04:50:32 AM »
forgive me magnus but i'm not following you...

i was trying to find a point of agreement to your previous post.that it was a "less cynical" time where a gentleman suitor might not be "pre-judged".

i read in that perhaps more trusting,more innocent.can you see where i might get that idea?

but whatever,i'm sure 1968 was hell.


1999
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss - Ep #0583
« on: August 05, 2008, 03:57:09 AM »
it was a much more trusting and innocent time...and the girls here certainly took ingenuishness to it's outer limits.

but it's just funny that they outright dismiss the idea that they might be being coveted.

2000
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss - Ep #0583
« on: August 05, 2008, 03:26:34 AM »
i always like scenes between alexandra and kathryn.they seem like real friends.

barnabas is one smooth operator here.so much for the "nice" barnabas the writers had spent so much of 1968 trying to force on us.he takes the opportunity to manipulate two very vulnerable girls,sitting there drinking coffee and minding their own business,with supposedly unselfish offers of "friendship" when that's the last thing on his mind.

what is it with vicki and maggie(and barnabas and nicholas)that makes them see these clowns as kindly older gentlemen friends rather than guys on the make?have they never heard of midlife crisises or trophy wives?

i liked it when barnabas tells vicki she's "looking well" and she modestly replies that she "hasn't looked in a mirror all day" when she's wearing an astounding amount of eye make-up(loscalzo was feeling frisky today).i'm not with lydia however on maggie's attire.i found the brown-and-white glen plaid to be very "junior sophisticates" and rather chic.i used to think that vicki always being in sleeveless was just cheapness on the part of the show's costumers,having her wear the same few dresses all the time,but she actually gets gifted with three new ones in mid-to-late 1968...the green one seen here,a black one and the black-and-white checked one.so someone upstairs must have really thought this was all the character could wear for some reason. [ghost_rolleyes]

2001
Current Talk '08 II / Re: polyester lovetowel
« on: August 05, 2008, 02:55:36 AM »
No offense, I think you're reading too much into the comment about the scarf. Way too much.

perhaps...

but the thought of adam,well you know,over carolyn's cheap polyester scarf just struck me as funny.

this storyline does have something of a strong sexual subtext.


2002
Current Talk '08 II / polyester lovetowel
« on: August 03, 2008, 02:24:29 AM »
i've been rewatching the 1968 episodes.

last night i watched the infamous "fake-carolyn" episode.diana walker's performance left me speechless!

anywho there is a scene where carolyn goes up to adam's room for some sort of confrontation(snooze)and discovers that the besotted monster has a polyester chiffon scarf of hers(i'm just guessing it's polyester chiffon.i doubt d.c.p. splurged for silk).he keeps it because it "reminds" him of her.

well,i don't need to spell that out,do i guys.you know what the implications of that are. [nono]

in fact the unspoken pyschosexual implications of this entire storyline(you know,with it's strongly suggested attempted sexual assault)are off the charts!

on a different note this episode seemed very "b-list" in it's cast.we get fake-carolyn,harry johnson,tony peterson gets dragged out of mothballs(neither one exactly movers and shakers),roger and the dull-as-a-thud adam.the very next episode features barnabas,julia,professor stokes,jeff clark and vicki and suddenly seems all "a-listy" again(did i just refer to jeff clark as "a-list"?).

a weird episode.

2003
true,

and because of the brutal,inhuman way barnabas treated maggie when he first arrived on the scene in 1967 i find any and all future implied pairings of the two to be somewhat revolting.

a change in the writing for a character can not undo all of their previous misdeeds.

2004
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss - Ep #0593
« on: August 01, 2008, 11:00:35 PM »
while it's true that barnabas was not in the vampire state by this point in 1968 maggie had in fact been kidnapped and imprisoned by him vampire or not.

she knew about the cell in the old house,josettes's room,the secret room in the mausoleum and she had been missing for several weeks.a mystery never solved.

so while collinsport law enforcement is not the world's most efficient they would at least have to investigate maggie's claims.so while the vampire angle could not have been proven here barnabas,willie and julia would have had alot of explaining to do.

was barnabas ever even officially a "suspect" in maggie's disappearance a year earlier or did the collins family name exclude him from such indignancies?

2005
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Review Of Dark Shadows: The Beginning, Vol. 5
« on: August 01, 2008, 10:45:44 PM »
i agree diana played laura to perfect pitch.

i wouldn't have wanted anyone else playing her.diana is laura and lara is angelique.period.two irreplaceable virtuosos.

in fact,although the pheonix's hundred year life cycle made this impossible,i would have liked to have seen much more of laura and/or diana throughout the series.

meeting diana in person is an odd experience.she definitely stays "in character" during the exchange.i've had several very strange conversations with her over the years but i think she's nice in general.during our last meeting she remembered me which i thought was nice.

does anyone know why she did not attend this year's event?

2006
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Collins Clan: "Simpsonized" (1 of 4)
« on: August 01, 2008, 10:35:28 PM »
brilliant heather!

these were the highlight of my day.

2007
just an f.y.i. to those involved...

i just tried to vote for the first time in several months and of course got the "we're sorry!" announcement.

that's why i stopped trying in the first place.i would have voted for d.s. many,many times but 90% of the time i tried was unable too.

that's a pretty major glitch.

2008
questionable taste,and even worse judgment,in her choice of partners is one of the defining hallmarks of carolyn stoddard hawkes.it's par for the course.

so her choice of jeb here didn't surprise me in the least.

2009
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Characters Ages. I need a little help here.
« on: July 29, 2008, 03:07:33 AM »
i can certainly buy carolyn as "17" when the series began.

in the early episodes she very much played the character like a teenager.

2010
oops i'm late!

hope it was great gothick. [beer]