Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - michael c

1936
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss: '91 Series - Ep #04
« on: October 11, 2008, 04:52:27 AM »
in some ways tonight's episode seemed like two different shows...

i didn't get a chance to post in last week's topic but david's "dream" involving daphne,carolyn and vicki was pure velveeta.tonight's opening scene at professor woodard's place topped that slice of velveeta with a nice dollop of cheese whiz.totally adolescent and camp.i felt really bad for the actor.

but the scene that introduced us to angelique was genuinely well done.scary and cool and sophisticated.strange this dichotomy.

deputy harker looks sort of like roger davis.he's kind of hot.

so here we get to the place where it starts to become clear that julia has feelings for barnabas.he totally plays into this.is he being manipulative or is he genuinely clueless at this point?how is it that julia is unaware that barnabas and vicki are an item?they don't seem to be trying to hide it.how does the family feel that their new governess is romantically involved with a family member?wouldn't this "upstairs/downstairs" type of thing be frowned upon in an old moneyed new england family?

i can't get into the whole barnabas and vicki romance.it rings false to me.

vicki gets some seriously "grannyish" duds in this ep.all that crochet and lace and that brooch!

ely pouget is hot but maggie needs some serious frizz control.

i like that people still smoked and drinked back then before the p.c. police started babysitting everyone.

laura.so david's mother is getting the big buildup here.so is her affect on him.i wonder where this is meant to go.strange that in the same episode that they introduce angelique they also give laura a shout out.it's sort of confusing.it's like who the heck is this "witch"?laura or angelique?

this came up in another topic but i don't remotely get a "mother/daughter" vibe from elizabeth and vicki here.it's not even hinted at.

i love the outdoor location that vicki and maggie get coffee.does anyone know where that is in california?
since vicki is already well acquainted with ghosts and vampires it's funny that she raises an eyebrow to maggie's claim to second sight.it's like the least of what she's heard lately but whatever.

i liked that the other characters got some focus this week and it wasn't just the barnabas show.i've decided that barnabas is the j.r. ewing of this affair.he sucks all the air out of the room.he's sort of exhausting.

1937
unfortunately ms.bonham carter is too old for any of the ingenue roles.so vicki,carolyn or maggie are out.

so is angelique. [128]

so unlesss they create a new character it's liz,julia or mrs.johnson...or maybe laura.

1938
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Vicki's Mother
« on: October 09, 2008, 12:42:20 AM »
liz as vicki's mother in the 1991 series is a bit of a ho-hum as far as i'm concerned.

barnabas was clearly the centerpiece of this series,at least in terms of how season one played out,and there's no reason to believe that that was going to change.

the whole "jane eyre" aspect of the victoria character,a waif in search of her identity,was basically absent from this version,it was barely touched upon.and the elizabeth character had nowhere near the stature that joan bennett brought to the role in the original series.here she was written as a virtual nonentity.she had absolutely no storyline.

so unless the plotting had changed dramatically in season two and beyond this "revelation" would not have had much impact.

1939
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss - Ep #0646
« on: October 08, 2008, 03:26:27 AM »
lydia...

perhaps the collins family should rent out an entire wing at wyndcliff just for their surviving domestic staff...they certainly endure no end of grief on this blasted estate.

the end of the vicki era and the start of the quentin era...sigh...i enjoyed the quentin haunting storyline tremendously but always wish alexandra had stuck around just three more months and played this storyline.the "turn of the screw" storyline was meant for her.i love maggie but never got into her in the governess role.

1940
Current Talk '08 II / Re: today's slideshow
« on: October 08, 2008, 03:10:07 AM »
gothick dear...

your narration on "room twenty four" was indeed chillsworthy!

perhaps room twenty four does not actually exist as a physical location on this earth but is simply a pocket in time and space.

an astral way station where one frets one's final days while the fates contemplate your condemnation.

nelson...

at least three other unfortunate souls had the karmic misfortune of ending up in room twenty four in the present...joe haskell,paul stoddard and olivia correy all called this bleak space home before they met their final destinies.

1941
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Vicki's Mother
« on: October 07, 2008, 07:02:18 PM »
another thought...

it's interesting that,as philippe pointed out,even dan curtis himself did not know how this particular plot was to be played out.perhaps soap operas don't plan themselves out so far in advance.they open with a series of storylines and they work themselves out over time dependant on a number of factors.this one,alas,was not to be solved but perhaps that adds to the mystery.

i believe that mysterious mentioned that in the 1991 series it was eventually to be revealed that vicki was in fact elizabeth's daughter but the series was cancelled before that could take place.again perhaps it is simply the destiny of this character to forever be this orphaned waif.it's elemental to her nature.

to get very off-topic the speculative,emotional nature of this conversation reminds me of something else that is endlessly bandied about...the old "did barnabas love julia?" chestnut.

now of course barnabas could not have in fact loved julia because they are not real people with real emotions.they are just characters played by two actors who were handed scripts every morning and asked to recite them.but within those paramaters they were very talented actors who brought alot of subtlety and nuance to the work and thus all of the speculation and emotionalism.

as scripted,barnabas never in fact professed love for julia.he professed love for lots of other women...josette,victoria,roxanne and even his nemesis angelique...but not julia.he expressed other emotions...hatred,reliance,affection,...but never love.

his expressed love for angelique,which infuriates many fans,actually took place within the scripts and thus must be accepted as "cannon" no matter how much we dislike or want to disbelieve it.it happened within the paramaters the show set for itself.it sucks but in effect it's "true".

however since a profession of "love" never gets scripted between barnabas and julia it becomes the nuance of the actors and it's implications that lends itself to so much interpretation.

much the same way that the performances of joan bennett and alexandra moltke lend themselves to all of the speculation in this topic.

1942
Current Talk '08 II / today's slideshow
« on: October 07, 2008, 06:31:06 PM »
i just thought that i'd point out that today's slideshow proudly features one of my personal favorite sets in all it's bleak spendor.

the purgatorial "room twenty four" in it's first incarnation as the suite of rooms burke devlin,it's first condemned occupant,takes at the collinsport inn.

perhaps a moment of silence for all those misfortunate enough to reside there over the years and the sad fate that befell them all. [hall2_sad]

1943
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Vicki's Mother
« on: October 07, 2008, 04:05:58 PM »
incidentally...

the portrait of betty handscomb doesn't just "look like" vicki but is in fact a line-for-line copy of a publicity photograph of alexandra moltke that i bought at the fest a few years ago.the dealer told me it was probably taken in 1965/6 just around the time she was cast in the series.

1944
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Vicki's Mother
« on: October 03, 2008, 09:55:43 PM »
what's interesting about this topic is it's very nature.

that it's all just speculation with many of us using our emotions for two fictitious human beings as a guide.

what's also interesting,in an odd and unsatisfying way,is that the show itself chose not to solve one of it's key mysteries.once it was decided that the show was moving in a new(supernatural)direction this could have been cleared up with a few words.indeed the scenes leading up to vicki and jeff's ill-fated wedding would have been the perfect time and joan bennett certainly played them from a decidedly maternal point of view.but for whatever reason the writers chose to leave this open-ended.

perhaps it's just the destiny of victoria winters to forever be an orphan.it's elemental to the character's nature.

1945
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Vicki's Mother
« on: October 02, 2008, 04:32:07 AM »
i agree philippe...

as written it appeared that liz knew much more about vicki's origins than she let on but was not herself vicki's mother.that's what i read into it.

but we'll never know will we?

1946
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Vicki's Mother
« on: October 02, 2008, 01:43:12 AM »
my reasons for not going for the liz-is-vicki's-mother theory are long and myriad.

but one of the main ones is simply this.this was never actually spelled out for us in specifics on the show itself.

for me only what actually happened on the original series between 1966 and 1971 is "cannon".anything else is just speculation or reinterpretation.it's not "real" if real is a word that can accurately be used to describe a completely fictitious situation.

yes the "return to collinwood" presentation "confirmed" that liz was vicki's mother but that was simply an amusing production written around the actors who were present at this event.if i recall it also had carolyn marrying ned stuart which is hardly cannon as far as i'm concerned.

this production also varies widely from what is supposed to have happened to these people from other "official" continuations of the series like the 'big finish' audiodramas and lara parkers books.they all tell different stories so what is actually "real"?

and yes in later years both joan bennett and alexandra isles "confirmed" this as well because it's the fan favorite but in truth neither of them actually "know" this to be a fact because this mystery was never actually solved on the series.it was never written into the scripts.the storyline was abandoned.

so to me this isn't "officially" part of the d.s. lore.

1947
Current Talk '08 II / Re: The DS Seances 1966-1971 (Inspired by Sandor)
« on: October 02, 2008, 01:18:27 AM »
in later years seances would become as trite and commonplace as time travel.some of the specialness went out of the concept.

but the first few were indeed touched by magic.to this day i cannot watch or think about the laura collins seance or the 1967 seance that sends vicki back in time without getting goosebumps.

1948
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss: '91 Series - Ep #02
« on: September 30, 2008, 12:04:18 AM »
thanks mysterious,

i'm genuinely not trying to be difficult.i'm just unfamiliar with shows of this nature.

on a high note i really like julia,carolyn and maggie quite alot.the more i see the more i like.

1949
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss: '91 Series - Ep #02
« on: September 29, 2008, 11:13:13 PM »
i'm still confused on this point.

i realize that in most modern vampire tales that we,the viewer,and certain key characters know from the outset of the existence of vampires.

but does absolutely everyone know about them.the way this series has been set up by episode three everyone in collinsport knows all about them.information that would presumably get out to the rest of the world instantly.

my only other experience with shows that dealt with the supernatural or paranormal was the "x-files" and generally it was just mulder,scully and a few others who were "on" to the exact nature of the proceedings.the rest of the world remained,in effect,outside the know.

that's why this series has me so puzzled.i don't understand the way it's plotted at all.

1950
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Discuss: '91 Series - Ep #02
« on: September 29, 2008, 10:02:48 PM »
nelson brings up an intersting point that i never would have thought about...embalming.

through the process of embalming isn't all the blood drained from the deceased and their internal organs removed?wouldn't this remove the potential for the,shall we say undead,to crave additional blood?also since the vampire angle was already dangling about at the time of daphne's death why wasn't she cremated?

and as nelson mentioned,why was a newly created tomb already covered in cobwebs?

as i said before i find the plotting of this to be mystifying.what was dan curtis going for exactly?except for that "other" show i'm unfamiliar with vampire lore.i've never seen 'buffy' or 'angel' or anything.but isn't it typical that an air of mystery surrounds the goings on for awhile before the presence of vampires is revealed towards the climax?in other vampire tales is it typical for everyone to know about it so early on?this doesn't seem to leave alot of places to go.

i'm going to try to phrase this carefully because "this" show has provided us with such sketchy outlines i'm watching and going on alot of assumptions that i'm not sure have actually been spelled out for us here.

for instance,i'm watching under the assumption that victoria winters is an orphan uncertain of her identity and thus is traveling to collinsport to get information.however except for a few words that imply that during her opening voiceover has that been spelled out here?is it established that liz and roger are siblings or am i just assuming that because i know the story?i'm assuming that family's wealth comes from the ownership of a cannery and other fishing enterprises but is that even suggested here?who is carolyn's father and why are there so few servants in this place?i'm filling in all those blanks,again,because i'm so familiar with this story as a whole but what did new viewers to this series think about these things?