Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - michael c

1816
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Actors' reaction to different directors
« on: April 06, 2009, 10:37:04 PM »
true,

as fond as we all are for the show it's important to remember that for the actors involved it was,at the time at least,just a "job" even if they liked it(and some did not).

and how many times have we all gone into work tired,or cranky,or just not "into it" or even said "i hate my job". [easter_rolleyes]

1817
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Actors' reaction to different directors
« on: April 06, 2009, 10:09:27 PM »
without a doubt joan did much of her best work on the series during it's first year.
which is why i found one of the dvd interviews with sam hall to be so baffling when he stated that it was during his tenure that joan's "ill defined" characterization of elizabeth collins stoddard was given some direction.hardly.

i'm rewatching the 1966 episodes and i'm being reminded of why i fell in love with liz in the first place.it's such a great,meaty role.her and mitch ryan are so well matched and i love their rivalrous scenes together.same goes for her scenes with louis edmonds.liz can be such an ice queen!

i'm also reminded of how much screen time liz got in the early days.in later years sometimes weeks go by(sadly)without an appearance.

in general i think that joan's performances are better when she's given some good material to work with.when she's peripheral sometimes she just phones it in.for that reason i really enjoyed her work as naomi and judith during the time travel storylines.it's great stuff.as ridiculous as the leviathan plot was one of the reasons i liked it was that liz was given some good material.again,frosty!

during the final months i did notice that joan,but more notably jonathan and grayson,seemed exhausted.

1818
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Episode 463 Pull the Blinds, Barnabas!
« on: April 06, 2009, 03:31:55 PM »
yes lacy's "bogie" shtick was cringe-inducing.

he must have been an off-contract player because he often disappeared for months.

if i recall it was a very long time between his 1897 trask and his next character in 1970pt.
incidentally i found that character to be somewhat unnecessary...he was sort of involved in the forgettable demeon edwards subplot but not really important to the storyline as a whole.

1819
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Episode 463 Pull the Blinds, Barnabas!
« on: April 05, 2009, 03:50:53 PM »
in late 1967/early 1968 they seemed to really be gearing up tony peterson to be a major character.

first with carolyn and then with cassandra.

as someone mentioned recently at first he seemed to be sort of a replacement for a burke devlin-type character.when he first stormed into collinwood demanding to see roger he reminded me of early burke...a collinsport local with a grudge against the money and influence of the collins family.

but by mid-1968 he seems to have become somewhat obsolete with monsters coming out of the woodwork.that type of character is never prominently featured on the series again.

1820
i wasn't born when the series orignally aired but i'm sure i would have been devastated by it's cancellation had i been a fan at the time.

however i have to say that as a contemporary viewer i have found the five year cycle to be quite satisfying.1200+ episodes of any series is hard to digest.to tell you the truth by the time of the 1840 storyline the series was losing steam for me and had begun to feel like a rehash.i grew bored.

i'm not sure how much more i could have watched so the five year run works for me. [easter_tongue]

1821
Current Talk '09 I / Re: The True Mistress of Collinwood
« on: April 01, 2009, 02:45:22 PM »
indeed...

of the later storylines parallel-time is definitely a favorite.hoffman is a big part of that.

it was a very well crafted,consice storyline if i recall which is ironic since it was created on the fly because so many of the "major" players were off doing the movie and this plot could primarily be populated by actors not heavily involved.i would have liked to have seen more of bennett,barrett,edmonds and so forth but david selby and lara parker certainly got the opportunity to take ownership.

if i recall it was told from a slightly more "adult" sensibility than some other storylines(read less monsters)and i appreciated that.

love hoffman!

1822
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Whatever Happened to Burke Devlin?
« on: March 31, 2009, 01:25:23 PM »
i'm currently watching the 1966 episodes and i had forgotten what a steamroller mitch ryan was as burke...his devlin owned this show.

by the time of the anthony george replacement the character,like everyone else,had become a supporting player in the barnabas saga.i can't see ryan playing second banana.

that barnabas somehow "caused" burke's plane crash is one of the series' great misconceptions.he didn't.

sarah warned david and carolyn that someone was going to die.they heard it in the music.no one would cause it and nothing could stop it.then vicki heard the wailing of the widow's...goosebumps!

1823
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0742
« on: March 25, 2009, 02:43:38 PM »
do all the different lauras remember what the previous lauras did or is she in effect "fresh" every time she shows up?

in other words did 1966 laura remember her 1797 and 1897 incarnations?

1824
Current Talk '09 I / the bangor pine!
« on: March 24, 2009, 02:59:40 AM »
it's been several years since i sat down and watched the 1966 episodes in their entirety...

i had completely forgotten about the opulence,the splendor,the lusciousness that is the "bangor pine" restaurant.it's the creamiest set ever!

it's so swank,so mechelin 3 star.

i love that it's bustling with waiters and maitre d's.so many extras.

burke and carolyn make a rather plebeian meal of salad and steak but it seems like the kind of place that would serve lots of things flambeed.perhaps they ordered crepes suzette for desert!

it's funny that they went to the trouble of such a nicely detailed set that only got one or two uses(i seem to recall vicki and frank garner there at some point).i'm trying to figure out the pattern on the wallpaper.sort of palm fronds and ivy.very 1940's.it sort of suggests that even at this juncture the old bangor pine was already a bit of a dowager.a bit passe.but i'd so love to dine there!

apart from everything else this episode(#42) is notable for another very signifigant reason...it is here that burke first gifts carolyn with THE PEN.we'll be seeing alot more of that for sure.

1825
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Dark Shadows: the First Year?
« on: March 19, 2009, 02:44:34 PM »
gothick,

i say go for the book.i bought it in tarrytown in '07.it's quite nicely done.

it's not printed on glossy paper but the quality is decent.don't expect too much in terms of new pictures though.it's reproductions of the same 1966 publicity shots and candids we've all seen a million times for the most part(alexandra,louis and david on the seaview grounds,etc.).but there are some production documents that are quite interesting and some early newspaper advertising for the program.

then there is the requisite cast lists,trivia and synopsises of the first 210 episodes.
they way the series was drawn out in the early days they also break in down into days and amusingly victoria as only at collinwood for an action-packed 52 days before you-know-who arrives to shake things up(some 'days' can last a staggering 15 episodes!).

but i say it's a nice addition to the collection.

1826
my mother lives in portland maine and there is a local place called "jay's" that's a bit blue whale-ish.

the maine part of the place is a bar but they serve awesome,fresh seafood...lobster,steamers,fish chowder,oyster stew and an amazing seafood casserole.
they probably serve steak too.

during the summer it gets a bit touristy but in the winter months it's all locals.we go every time i visit.

however unlike the blue whale no dancing(sorry carolyn).

1827
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0739
« on: March 17, 2009, 06:59:43 PM »
arashi,

at the festival a few years ago i bought a picture of diana in a very late-1950's "pin-up" jungle get up posing with,i think,a stuffed tiger(i'll have to dig it up).

diana autographed it.

i always thought she was quite pretty...and is without question one of my absolute favorite d.s. characters/actors.

1828
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Question about Quentin and ratings
« on: March 17, 2009, 03:09:26 AM »
dan curtis seemed keenly aware of how to "brand" certain elements of this series in immediately identifiable ways.

with barnabas it was the onyx ring,the wolfhead cane and that inverness cape.he's wearing them in virtually all of the publicity photos even though much of the time the character was just seen wearing a suit.they're part and parcel of the character's "brand".

with quentin it was those sideburns,the gramophone and that funky victorian room.one of the many things that irritated me about quentin after 1897 was that they stuck him back in that room.it never made any sense plotwise but it was part of the character's "brand" and curtis seemed to want to market the character in as an arresting a way as possible and that was it.so i'm not surprised to hear that he was the second biggest player in the marketing juggernaut.

i think that's why david selby's characters were always called "quentin" whether or not series continuity backed that up.it's also interesting that the character was continually marketed in the werewolf guise given that after 1897 he was never in that form again.

julia appeared in far more episodes that quentin ever did and was more important to several plots but i guess a middle aged suit wearing lady doctor is harder to market and not as easily identifiable...especially to those kids that you know what.

are we talking about the ross novels here?i'm very surprised to hear that angelique only appearred in one.she was a pretty major player but thoses novels were pretty loosely connected to what was actually happening on the series itself. [snow_rolleyes]

1829
isn't newark n.j. one of the most dangerous cities in the country?

yikes!

1830
Current Talk '09 I / Re: Up to episode 91
« on: March 06, 2009, 04:21:40 AM »
oh oh! [snow_shocked]

i think we might have yet another case of d.s. "false memory syndrome" here.

because the person in question certainly does know what he's talking about...it's writer ron sproat who penned the foreward to this book.

he says he came onto the show thirteen weeks into it's run "after wallace had left" and that he had had a hard time connecting with the material wallace had "left behind" concerning the intrigue at the cannery.

perhaps he just doesn't recall that wallace was still around for several months.