Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - michael c

106
Current Talk '17 I / Re: DS episodes online
« on: April 23, 2017, 10:58:38 AM »
when MPI removed the episodes on Youtube there were lots of younger/newer viewers who were like "who the heck is MPI"?

newbies! any old school knew MPI intimately. for years i was on the phone with them almost weekly ordering the episodes tape-by-tape before eventually upgrading to the dvd format. it took forever but it was fun.

107
Current Talk '17 I / Re: He's So Mean
« on: April 22, 2017, 12:59:17 PM »
he was introduced as a villain. and he was a vampire. what's so "unbelievable" about it?  [easter_huh]

108
Current Talk '24 I / Re: WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: April 08, 2017, 11:21:05 AM »
i really don't know how marketable the pilot is on it's own. didn't someone suggest it might be included in a larger package of DS "oddities" like The House and a few other odds and ends? to me that seems more plausible given how the company has marketed things in the past.

109
Current Talk '24 I / Re: WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: April 07, 2017, 09:32:13 PM »
the market for a failed pilot has got to be pretty minimal. but i suppose DS has a fanatically devoted fanbase so it's a relatively small but captive audience.

and since it's just been sitting in a vault somewhere collecting dust for the last 13 years i guess taking in any revenue from it is better than none. and we're obviously past the point of there being any expectations for a "sequel" or "franchise" coming out of the Burton/Depp iteration so perhaps that's no longer an issue.

110
Current Talk '24 I / Re: WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: April 07, 2017, 08:02:01 PM »
there's been a lot of posting on FB that MPI has no "ownership" or any other "rights" to the 2004 property. that's it's owned by WB.

so i'm not sure under what authority they were able to have this removed? it's been my understanding they ONLY maintain rights to the OS. 91, 04 and 12 (and the 70/71 films) are not their properties.  [easter_huh]

111
Current Talk '24 I / Re: WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: April 07, 2017, 12:23:53 AM »
as predicted earlier it's been taken down. apparently by MPI.

112
2012 "comedy"? OUCH!  [easter_shocked]

113
Current Talk '24 I / Re: WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: March 27, 2017, 02:55:05 PM »
this release has certainly kicked up a fuss on all the FB DS pages. suffice to say most of the comments are on how much more or less it "sucks" than the Burton version.

at least words like "travesty" and "abomination' are not being applied to it as liberally.  [easter_rolleyes]

114
Current Talk '17 I / Re: "Filthy" DS Topic
« on: March 18, 2017, 08:09:42 PM »
today of course was also have the increasingly important category of "prestige television" for actresses over 50 to soften their landing and often find some of their best work. Lang in particular has had an incredibly successful second act in genre. 'Feud' certainly typifies that.

115
Current Talk '17 I / Re: "Filthy" DS Topic
« on: March 18, 2017, 11:09:35 AM »
a friend of mine calls these actresses during this period, perhaps uncharitably, the "hatchet hags"...

as their "leading ladies" days wound down in the 1960s and 70s they were able to find work in the "horror" and "disaster" genres (as well as soap operas). perhaps launched with WHTBJ they played a series of ghoulish sendups of themselves and although a bit tarnished their names and presence lent cache to these often schlocky or "B" productions.

116
Current Talk '17 I / Re: 8 Worst Soap Opera Re-casting Decisions
« on: March 16, 2017, 02:10:55 AM »
the ill-fated Ms Durkin stepped into the role at an impossibly difficult moment for the character and the show in general. i believe someone here once called the period "ultra-phantasmagorical".

an extremely strange 4 or 5 week period where most of the 1968 plots were flaming out spectacularly and there was about to be an abrupt shift to an entirely different storyline and new set of characters. i haven't seen this particular set of episodes in ages but wasn't Vicki kidnapped, attacked and tortured on an almost daily basis during Durkin's brief tenure? to say nothing of the death throes of the Peter Bradford plot. i just recall her screaming A LOT. who knows how Alexandra would have handled the same preposterous material but she always underplayed nicely. at the very least the audience was used to her.

perhaps she would have eventually mellowed into the role. but in a lot of ways she was in a no-win situation.

117
Current Talk '17 I / Re: "Filthy" DS Topic
« on: March 12, 2017, 11:09:07 PM »
i wouldn't be at all surprised to hear that DC and company had at some early stage of development  "considered" JC for the role of Liz.

at the time, and continuing well into the 1980s, it was becoming somewhat common practice to cast, shall we say, slightly "past their prime" actresses from Hollywood's "golden age" in frothy roles as dowagers and matriarchs on soap operas.

the pay was probably chump change compared to what they had earned on the big screen at their peak. but it was regular work which by the 1960s was not easy to come by. and dented egos were placated by special "starring" or "above the title" billing (which we certainly saw with Joan on DS well after Jonathan Frid was the clearly established star) and lavish wardrobe.

i don't know exactly JB was ultimately selected but there was probably a list of actresses from the period in preliminary consideration.

118
because it was the closing season Vanessa's "death" had an air of "finality" to it. but given the premise of the series..where reanimation and eternal life are major themes..there's really nothing to prevent her "return" in any future variation of the story.

death means nothing in the PD universe.

119
Current Talk '17 I / Re: "Filthy" DS Topic
« on: February 28, 2017, 01:54:49 AM »
i could be wrong but during the entire five year run i think the newlywed Mr. and Mrs. Jeb Hawkes was the first and only time we ever saw a couple in bed together.  [snow_shocked]

120
Calendar Events / Announcements '17 I / Re: Penny Dreadful
« on: February 26, 2017, 03:16:58 PM »
somewhat OT but related to this article CMT was nuts to pick up 'Nashville' if it didn't have Britton secured long term...

without it's protagonist it's doomed to failure. the secondary characters can't carry it. they should just cancel it now and spare everyone a lot of aggravation.