Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Philippe Cordier

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 »
91
A reminder that the 1967 B&W movie "Eye of the Devil" airs on TCM late night Saturday (actually 3:15 a.m. EST Sunday, 2:15 a.m. Central).  Several people have been interested in this movie in the past, which is why I'm posting about it again.  Despite the title, this is not a garish horror flick, but an atmospheric, nuanced story with mythic elements.  The top-notch cast includes Deborah Kerr, David Niven, Flora Robson, Donald Pleasance, and Emlyn Williams.

One aspect of the movie I like are the many variations of trance and dream states throughout.

Beware of the many negative but uninformed reviews of this movie.  Several state that the opening scenes are set in London, which tells you something about how closely some viewers (including professional reviewers) watched the movie (the opening scenes are set in Paris, where the opening shots were filmed).  Edgy camera work was panned in "Variety" as being influenced by TV commercials!  (I would like to have seen those TV commercials ...)

I believe the last scene to have inspired the ending of NODS (i.e., Quentin going back into the house for seemingly innocent purposes ...).  "Eye of the Devil" also seems to have provided inspiration for the idea behind "The Wicker Man."  Of the two movies, I prefer "Eye of the Devil," at least in part because of its Gothic atmosphere.


92
Current Talk '03 II / Gerard/Judah's Surprising Lack of Powers
« on: December 07, 2003, 05:49:13 AM »
This has been puzzling me for the past few weeks of 1840.  There have been any number of instances where one would think Gerard would have the ability to discern the truth about situations beyond an ordinary mortal's capacity, yet he hasn't displayed many powers other than giving Daphne bad dreams with his Celtic cross ...  (e.g., he's unaware of Gabriel sneaking up behind him in an attempt on his life).

In one of Thursday's episodes, the Evan Handley character seemingly addressed this, finally, asking Gerard something like why he hasn't been using his powers, or suggesting that he use his powers (this may have been to uncover where Quentin and Desmond were hiding out).

If it's the case of choosing to exercise his powers or not, Judah has had a seemingly curious lack of interest in using them ...


93
Current Talk '03 II / Was Joanna Mills a Witch?
« on: December 07, 2003, 05:44:23 AM »
Joanna Mills seemed to have powers far beyond those of any ordinary dead person or ghost on Dark Shadows.  How do we explain this?  Might Miss Mills, as she is referred to, have been a witch in life?  Her corporeal body reminds me of Angelique's physical body in her returns from the dead, e.g. the 1795 courtroom scene.  Also, Miss Mills and Miss Harridge are sisters -- so why do they have different last names  ???


94
Current Talk '03 II / Samantha Collins -- Who Knew?
« on: November 26, 2003, 02:45:59 AM »
Who knew what secret Samantha Collins was hiding -- that she had (she thought) killed Joanna Harridge.

(As an aside, it's a little surprising that the mental asylum allowed patients to roam freely on the edge of a cliff ...  ;D )

I wonder if keeping this secret contributed to Samantha's irritable personality ... her hair-trigger temper ...

At any rate, this reveals another layer to Samantha's character ... and who knows what other secrets she may have (e.g., re: Tad).

A while back someone commented that they didn't like the change in Samantha's personality after the earlier 1840 eps.  I think it was all planned from the start.  Certainly the writers knew about Daphne and Gerard -- this was evident from the 1970 haunting and 1995.  Quentin and Joanna were known from the beginning of 1840.  Samantha and Gerard was obviously known/planned from the start.  The Quentin and Daphne pairing also seems likely to have been part of the original plan.  Since all these relationships were plotted out, it seems likely that Samantha's killing of Joanna was also known from the beginning.  They certainly handed Virginia Vestoff and fantastic role to sink her teeth into!

95
Current Talk '03 II / Thayer David's Three 1840 Roles
« on: November 24, 2003, 10:24:58 PM »
Someone recently said that the character of Ben Stokes was brought back for little apparent purpose at the beginning of 1840.  Although I disagree with that assessment, I just thought I'd point out the very practical reasons the writers may have had in killing off poor Ben Stokes early on -- Thayer David's return in two successive roles within the same storyline.

I wonder if any other actor did this on DS -- three different characters in one storyline!  And each one an individual creation -- Ben Stokes, Mordecai Grimes, and Professor T. Eliot Stokes.

Kudos to Thayer David!  And to those who plotted and casted the 1840 storyline!


96
Current Talk '03 II / Angelique's Change of Heart
« on: November 19, 2003, 04:39:43 AM »
Julia is right to mistrust Angelique -- that's how I feel at this point in our current viewing.

And while Barnabas is rightly skeptical, he does seem convinced that Angelique is genuine.

She does hesitate when Barnabas asks her if the cure is for good.  Is she not sure whether her lifting the spell will be successful permanently?  Or is she trying to resolve her own doubts in her own mind, not sure if she really and truly means for Barnabas to be free once and for all?

If she does mean to have set Barnabas free, how could Angelique have changed so completely?

We are prepared for this possible change of heart not once, but twice, in the series -- in 1897 and again during the Leviathan storyline, both where Angelique agrees to help Barnabas.  She obviously had not changed as much as she seems to have in 1840, but the glimmer of a less selfish side to her personality was evident.

A change of heart like Angelique's is possible ... It is possible for people to grow and to learn, and I think the idea of redemption may actually be the central theme of Dark Shadows.

But at the same time, what might have happened had Angelique not
[spoiler]died[/spoiler]
at the end of the 1840 storyline?  I suspect that she might eventually have gone back to her old ways.  The temptations -- the jealous nature, the delight in having power over others -- may not be so easily shirked off.

Angelique redeemed -- a change of heart and mind (which is the literal meaning of "repentance") -- does not necessarily equal Angelique the saint.

97
Current Talk '03 II / Gerard's Watch Fob
« on: November 13, 2003, 06:56:24 AM »
Another delayed reaction, but ...

I happened to come across something called the "Dark Shadows FAQ."  I'm not sure where it is or how I found it -- I think it used to be linked on Mr. Juggins' webpage ... I know I saved it on disks a few years back.  This is an excellent compendium of knowledge, with some of the best material on DS I've read.

Any way, according to the FAQ, the image on Gerard's watch fob stolen by Lazlo represents the Colussus of Rhodes -- one of the Seven Wonders of the (Ancient) World.  I'm amazed that someone was able to identify this ... I know I looked at it but couldn't identify the image ... to me it looked like possibly a religious medallion.

At any rate, the FAQ author points out that the Colussus itself is a representation of Helios, the god of the sun (later Apollo).  Somehow I find this very interesting ... maybe because Apollo, as the patron and inspirer of reason, order, and poetry (if I'm remembering my Greek mythology) has always been my favorite among the Greek pantheon.  I seem to remember that he was often seen as the direct opposite of Dionysus -- god of unreason, licensiousness, etc.

Interesting if the icon of Apollo was carefully selected for Gerard.  In some ways, it does fit him ... the original Gerard, that is.  Despite his gun running, opportunism, and other exploits, Gerard also was a man of some culture and sophistication ... he plays the piano, for instance; and appears to fit in comfortably with the aristocratic Collins family.

Yet the danger Gerard represented, which has magnified a thousandfold with his possession by Judah Zachary, makes the iconic image of Apollo an ironic representation.  Given the destruction with which Gerard is now associated, perhaps the proper symbol for Gerard/Judah would be the opposing force of Dionysis, destructive and seductive ...


98
Current Talk '03 II / Reading of the Will - Excellent Episode
« on: November 13, 2003, 06:39:20 AM »
This is a bit late, but ...

The episode where "Father Collins's" will was read was very well done.  I started to notice the tension of the scene when Edith began pacing back and forth.  Each of those present in the scene -- Edith, Gabriel, Gerard, Samantha, Desmond -- conveyed a unique emotional tension, which was really quite extraordinary to see.  I thought the individual reactions after the reading -- such as Edith's laugh -- were also very realistic ... (so much so that it brought back a memory of a divisive reading of a will that I unfortunately had experience with.  It's amazing how something like the division of property/money can damage family relationships.)

The physicality of this scene was impressively complemented, I thought, with the episode's closing scene which intercut the miming (not quite the right word ...) spell with Edith and the actual death of Mrs. Ward.

I don't know who directed this episode -- there were no credits at the end of this ep.  But whomever it was did a masterful job!


99
Calendar Events / Announcements '03 II / The Night of the Sun and the Moon
« on: November 09, 2003, 01:52:44 AM »

Total eclipse of the moon -- and it's happening right now!!!   ;D ;D ;D


100
Current Talk '03 II / How Did Angelique Get Her Powers?
« on: October 31, 2003, 10:01:55 PM »
I don't think this question is ever answered, but 1840 provides the most clues.  Everything that has been said so far in these past few episodes implies that Angelique has had a continuous existence since the 1600s.  It sounds as though Angelique, or Miranda du Val as she was actually named, had been a villager in the town where Judah Zachary had his coven, and that she was an ordinary girl who was swept up into the cult like many others -- something is said about the entire town being "corrupted"; I don't remember what the name of the town was.  Later I think mention is made of her having been a serving girl at the time.

Amadeus Collins informs Miranda in 1692 that if she testifies against Judah Zachary, he will ensure that she gets safe passage out of the country.

This fits in with what we know of Angelique's past from 1795, i.e. that she lived in Martinique when she first met Barnabas.

The logical conclusion is that Miranda changed her name and identity and moved far away, like someone under the Witness Protection Program today.

Somehow in those intervening years, Angelique gained 1) immortality and 2) powers of witchcraft.

Regarding her longevity, Judah Zachary/Gerard says:  "She is Miranda du Val" -- note that he does not say that she "was" Miranda, but that she "is" Miranda.  He obviously regards her as having survived since 1692.  There is no suggestion that she is reincarnated.  "I found ways to survive -- perhaps she did too," he says.  And at another point, JZ/Gerard addresses Angelique (though she's not present):  "You have survived this long, but I will have the final satisfaction of destroying you."

It will be interesting to listen carefully for further clues to see how much more we can discover about Miranda's transformation into Angelique.


101
Current Talk '03 II / The Mask of Ba'al
« on: October 30, 2003, 04:52:31 AM »
Not long ago, I talked about the mythic dimension of disembodied heads, how there were ancient cults surrounding severed heads, and of the magical properties they have been thought to have had at various times in history.  I felt that the Dark Shadows writers were drawing on this archetype in making the head of Judah Zachary of focus of this storyline.

Now I'd llike to briefly draw attention to the other major mythic aspect of 1840, which is the ritualistic Mask of Ba'al.

Masks have been part of ancient ritual since prehistoric times when they were used by shamans in their spirit ceremonies.

Shamanism was the spiritual practice of most cultures before the development of religions.  The term comes from a Siberian word, and shamanism is thought to have originated in Siberia and Central Asia.  The shaman is analogous to the concept of priest, a broker between the earthly and supernatural spirit realm.

The purpose of the mask in shamanistic ceremonies was "to proclaim the incarnation of a mythological figure - a god, ancestor, or mystic animal. The mask effects the transubstantiation of the shaman, transforming him before everyone's eyes into the supernatural being he is impersonating"  (http://religiousmovements.lib.virginia.edu/nrms/shaman.html).

The possession of Gerard by Judah Zachary is only complete when Gerard puts on the mask.

In using the mask in a ritualistic way, the Dark Shadows writers are drawing on ancient religious practices that have entered the realm of myth and archetype.

The other significant aspect of the mask is that it is referred to as the "mask of Baal [or Ba'al]."

Without getting into too much detail, ba'al refers to a class of gods of the ancient Canaanite people.  These gods had possession or lordship over various aspects of life.  Later it seems that the term became a proper name for one individual god.  The Hebrew people at various times practiced Baal worship, though this was always denounced by the prophets in the Bible.

I think the DS writers are using the term rather loosely, though, as a synonym for Satan.  Ba'al worship came to be associated with evil in the Jewish tradition, and the Christian interpretation makes the association one with Satan.  Angelique informs us that Judah Zachary was "a disciple of Lucifer's" and he is also referred to as the devil's son.  I think the writers are just using Ba'al as a somewhat exotic name that we are meant to associate with Satan.


102
Current Talk '03 II / Voice of Judah vs. Judah Zachary
« on: October 29, 2003, 09:20:59 PM »
I'm confused over the episode where Angelique has the flashback to the 1692 courtroom when she testifies against Judah Zachary.

I know it was explained during the last run that the voice of Judah Zachary was actually that of Keene Curtis.  The closing credits for the episode read:

Voice of Judah
Keene Curtis

Judah Zachary
Michael McGuire


I have a number of questions.  First, why did Keene Curtis do the voice of Judah rather than the actor who is playing him (Michael McGuire)?  That seems an unusual situation, to say the least.  Granted, Curtis' voice was fantastic, and maybe McGuire has a high-pitched whine or something ... but if that's the case, why would he have been cast in the part to begin with?

Second, was Keene's voice dubbed?  Was the hooded Judah Zachary Michael McGuire in that scene, or was it actually Keene Curtis.  Watching the tape a couple of times, it certainly LOOKS like the voice/words are coming directly out of the hooded actor's mouth ... i.e., it didn't look dubbed or like a voice over, with the actor only mouthing the words.

Could the hooded actor have been Keene Curtis, and then when there was a cutaway, was he then substituted with McGuire in the cut where Judah Zachary removes the hood?  THAT actor didn't look like McGuire to me, though -- was it Keene Curtis?

What about the other voiceovers, such as when Gerard is hearing Judah Zachary's voice?  It sounds to me like James Storm is doing JZ's voice in those sequences, which could be the case if they're trying to make it so that Judah's thoughts and personality are beginning to meld with Gerard's.


103
Current Talk '03 II / How Many Heads?
« on: October 28, 2003, 01:50:10 AM »
I'm puzzled about something I don't remember from seeing 1840 before, and I'm wondering if my current daily taping got out of order when I fell behind in my viewing last week ...

Anyway, from what I've seen, Julia "Collins" and Leticia Faye stitched Judah Zachary's head back onto his body (implied), the body came to life but then didn't, Julia and Leticia leave, Gerard Stiles enters the crypt and removes the mask from the lifeless body which then comes to life, they grapple and Gerard escapes the crypt but Judah Zachary is apparently killed in a fire that breaks out, Julia and Barnabas return to the crypt and find his arm sticking out from under the rubble and cavalierly pronounce him dead.  At this point (at least as I've taped it), Gerard returns to Rose Cottage, where he consults the head of Judah Zachary, which is still in its glass case.

At first I thought I was watching an old episode on the tape, but then the head seemed to instigate a dream in which Gerard is inspired to return to the tomb for the mask.

That's about as far as I've gotten (and I had to pre-empt the second episode last Thursday so I could tape something on another channel) ... but I also noticed Quentin wearing his unusual ring, although I don't think that has been introduced yet, unless that was the episode I missed taping ...

Anyway, if Judah Zachary's head was attached to his body, how could it still be in the glass case at Rose Cottage?

 ???

104
Testing. 1, 2, 3... / I-Message Interruptus
« on: October 24, 2003, 06:54:58 AM »
I was about to send an IM a moment ago, and as I clicked the "Send" icon, a message box popped up saying that Internet Explorer (I think) had encountered a problem and the my act could not be completed, and that Internet Explorer had to shut down.

I had no choice but to click the "Close Now" option.  I then re-opened Internet Explorer and got into the forum again (which I seemed to still be logged into), then went to my Outbox, and was surprised to see a copy of the message there, since it didn't seem that it was going to send.

My question is, if it's in my Outbox, can I be assured that it was sent and that the recipient received it?

BTW, I had no idea how much activity there is on this "Testing" area ...


105
Current Talk '03 II / Daniel and Harriet Collins
« on: October 23, 2003, 06:39:45 AM »
I don't know if anyone has said anything about this, but I'd be interested to know more about the Daniel Collins "backstory" to 1840.  I'm wondering who Harriet was (besides being his wife) and why Daniel murdered her.

Despite his being a murderer, Daniel is one of the characters we sympathise most with in this storyline.  This complexity of character and the ambivalent feelings the viewer has toward him -- we sympathize, but at the same time have reservations knowing that he's a murderer -- is a sign of good character development -- by both writer and actor.  I always prefer shades of gray to black and white interpretations.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 »