Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Philippe Cordier

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
181
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 I / "The Uninvited"
« on: April 03, 2002, 03:27:27 AM »
Luciaphil recently called this movie to our attention.  It's supposed to be a classic film about a haunting that inspired certain aspects of DS.

Now, I noticed in my TV schedule that SciFi is scheduled to air "The Uninvited" late-night this Wednesday (actually early Thurs. a.m., at least where I live).

I can't wait to see it!  Set your VCRs ...

Now all I have to look for is those movies Gothick mentioned, which I had never heard of, and that Two-Headed Thing that wouldn't Die or whatever it is ...

::)


182
Current Talk '02 I / Angelique: Terrorist? ... And Other Thoughts
« on: April 03, 2002, 03:19:48 AM »
Now that I'm recovering from my near-heart attack after receiving an e-mail message from the administrator that I had been removed from the board (were my comments on the supernatural really THAT controversial?), I've decided to REALLY push things ...

(I was relieved to find the thread saying that the same thing had happened to others, but my heart is still pounding ...)

Actually, my title for this thread is mainly an attention getter  ... While it MIGHT be an interesting topic to debate in light of current world events, I fear that such debate would not be healthy for this board ...

So, I RESTRICT my comments to this sense:  Is Angelique a terrorist, in a non-political sense?  In other words, does she seek to terrorize, cower, and strike at innocents without mercy or conscience to get what she wants?  Whether or not she has a legitimate gripe, does that justify her actions?  Oh boy, that actually probably could serve as a definition for a political terrorist.  Let's just keep the discussion from veering into current events and mention of specific nationalities or peoples ...

One might argue, on the other hand, that in Josette's case, at least, Angelique might actually be doing Josette a big favor -- Josette will not become one of the cursed undead.

Other comments upon viewing yesterday's excellent episodes ...

Strong acting by Grayson Hall as Countess DuPres.  In fact, I think this is some of the best work she has done in the series up to now.  She seemed very natural and real in her concern for Josette, her suspicions, her fears.

Louis Edmonds was superb, which isn't too surprising.

Has Vicki been visited by an Avon saleswoman in her jail cell?  It looked like she had had a makeover.  (Hope I'm not encroaching on Luciaphil territory here ...   ;)  )

Three clues ... I think these were 1) a lost ring, 2) the sound of glass breaking, and 3) a storm ...

I love the tension that this builds, but as those who have seen the complete series know, the tension will be much more prolonged when even more interesting clues are presented in the 1897 storyline ... and there'll be a further twist of the screw when we get to 1840, when the ingeniously devised clues even cross the centuries ...

A sense of hopelessness in the face of fate ... that's a feeling that I realize DS often gives us.  No matter what the characters do, if something is fated, it can't be stopped.  (Oh, there will be a breath of relief, of optimism, at a couple of pivotal points in the last few months of the series ...)

It makes me think:  would I want to know future events that may be in store for me?

Vlad



183
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 I / DS and Real-Life Supernatural
« on: March 28, 2002, 04:36:29 AM »
All of these old interviews we've been lucky enough to read made me think that, in all of the interviews with DS personnel I've read over the years, the only person connected with the series I know of who has expressed a belief in the supernatural is Diana Millay. Specifically, Frid, Edmonds, and Parker and perhaps others have disavowed any belief in it.  

That might surprise some fans of the series, even though we know - hopefully [goofg] -  that they are actors playing a part in a fictional drama. [roll3]  Still, it is a bit surprising , given the reputation of actors for being superstitious, that more of the DS actors were not believers in the supernatural.   I wonder if that's true of the writers as well.

On the other hand, I'll bet the fan base is quite different from the actors in this regard.  [sconf]  Any thoughts?


184
Current Talk '02 I / More 1795 Comments
« on: February 27, 2002, 10:15:48 PM »
Originally posted by Vlad on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 27, 2002 at 16:15:48:

I would have added this to Luciaphil's original thread, and my costume comment under Happybat's, but with all the activity on the board recently :) it seems that threads only a week old are already being removed. [sadb]

First, a question: Is Angelique the maid of Countess du Pres or Angelique? [sadg] I was surprised to hear that Angelique will be returning to Martinique with Natalie and Andre after Josette is married, so apparently she is the countess' maid, not Josette's personal maid. I must have had Lara Parker's novel more clearly in mind, where Angelique was hired to be a companion and maid for Josette when they were children (and also sisters, but that's another story. :)

Later in the original series, Natalie says that she knew Angelique's mother, and also that she knew Angelique when she was an "uninteresting child." However, given what we know about Angelique, [spoiler]actually having lived in earlier Colonial times as Miranda du Val, I have rationalized that the older Countess simply referred to the sweet young slip of a thing Angelique as "a child." Apparently Miranda/Angelique was somehow achieved immortality when she was around 20, I'd guess. Any ideas on how the apparently innocent Miranda became the evil Angelique? Lara Parker did a good job investigating the psychological possibilities of how someone becomes evil, but she ignored Angelique's history as Miranda and instead had her born and growing up on Martinique.[/spoiler]

Also, I must have missed some dialogue here -- did Josette arrive in New York after a sea voyage from Martinique, or from Paris?

I must say I'm getting a rather perverse delight in watching Angelique at work here - those eyes are real killers.  ::) ::)

Has anyone noticed how the lighting in 1795 seems to make everyone's faces thinner (hollow cheeks)? :) :) I noticed this first with Nancy Barrett, then Vicki, and today with KLS. :)

This is probably just me, but I always have a hard time remembering that Jeremiah is Barnabas' uncle rather than his brother. For some reason it just seems to me like they should be brothers. :) Interestingly, that is the way the 1991 revival series did it. However, having two brothers in love with the same girl seems more of a cliche. Maybe that's what the original series writers were trying to avoid.

A note on the men's costumes - Comparing the 1790 costumes in the 1991 series with what we're seeing now, I'd have to say the 1991 series costumes were much more attractive and flattering to the men. For one thing, the pants were - ahem - looser  :o ; also, the colors are more monochromatic rather than the variegated colors we see in the original series. Does anyone know which series had the more "authentic" men's costumes for this period? The fabrics in the 1991 series also looked more luxurious to this untrained eye.  ::)

-Vlad

185
Current Talk '02 I / Seance Fun -- O.T.
« on: February 22, 2002, 12:48:21 AM »
Originally posted by Vlad on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 21, 2002 at 18:48:21:

Does anyone have memories of holding seances as a kid as a result of "Dark Shadows?"

I remember having a childhood interest in seances, and though I can't specifically remember seeing seances on the show, I'm sure DS must have played some role in this.

I do remember holding one particular seance, though, with me as the "medium." I was very interested in magic at the time, and my hero was Houdini, whom I read about avidly. Houdini badly wanted to believe in life after death and to communicate with his deceased mother, but he wasn't willing to be taken in by charlatans whose methods he could easily recognize. He became a great exposer of psychic frauds. Anyway, in my reading of magician's tricks, I devised a seance that I put on for my sister and parents.

My older sister typically heckled me a bit, but after I had my dad tie me to a chair and the lights were put out, she gasped when only a few moments later a luminous ball bobbed through the air around the room. I vaguely remember producing some other phenomena, such as some knocks on the table, and once the lights came back on (and I was seen to be still securely tied to my chair), a small school slate now had writing on it by the spirits! [eek]

How did I do it? Like all magicians - and psychic practitioners - I'll never reveal my secrets! ;)

As an aside, it's interesting to note how today's psychic mediums have changed their shows for today's more sophisticated (?) audiences. No longer satisfied with producing ectoplasm and disembodied voices through a spirit trumpet, today's spirits prefer to communicate through tantalizing guesswork - "I'm Aunt Tillie, but I'll tease them by saying, My name begins with a "T" - - Surely someone in the audience knows of someone who has "crossed over" whose name has a "T" in it! [chkyg]

Anyone else with seance memories?

Hoping to try out for the U.S. Skeleton team in the 2006 Olympics (and only tied up on very *special* occasions nowadays [blshy]), I am ...

-Vlad

:) :) :)

186
Current Talk '02 I / Favorite Collinwood Libations
« on: February 19, 2002, 12:06:52 AM »
Originally posted by Vlad on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion on February 18, 2002 at 18:06:52:

Has anyone catalogued what alcoholic beverage every character drinks in every time period on the show? [idea2]

I think this would be an interesting exercise in trivia -- and just think what it might reveal about each character! [gring]

I've noticed in several posts recently that people have made references to brandy. Not having paid too much attention to this sort of thing during my previous viewings, I'm guessing that brandy is Roger Collins' drink of choice. I'm trying to remember what Naomi Collins liked to nip back in 1795. A complete list should expand beyond the dark-paneled walls of Collinwood, of course - The Blue Whale would open up a whole new vista into the characters' lives - What do Vicki and Carolyn order when they're kicking back or dancing to the one-tune jukebox? Better add the Evans cottage to the list  - Can't remember, did Matthew Morgan like to put back a few, too? :)

Last Friday, Barnabas hospitably offered Julia a glass of port when she dropped by for a chat about why he was terrorizing her. (Ahh, port and claret - I seem to remember those being mentioned in Jane Austen novels, Gone With the Wind -) A few days previously, I think, Elizabeth offered someone a sherry. :) :)

I have to blame Castlebee for getting me going on this - a while back she gave me directions for making a hot toddy - I finally got around to experimenting this past weekend (confidential to Castlebee: It happened again - getting carded, I mean - and is it really necessary to even add water?? [nuts] [nuts]

And while I got around to buying the necessary ingredients for my hot toddy (now that the cold cold winter - not! - is finally about over [crossed fingers] - though I was happy with my hot mulled wine in the meantime), a memory flashed into my mind about Barnabas and Amontillado. So I checked for that while at the liquor store. I've never especially cared for sherry (though I've sipped it at the source, so to speak, in Jerez de la Frontera, and at countless English department functions in years past), I decided it might add a note of authenticity to my late-night viewings of DS. Needing to economize, I substituted a "dry" sherry for imported Amontillado, and found that - surprise of surprises, I actually liked it now!

Enough of my ramblings - (NOT the effects of imbibing, I hasten to add -- that was last weekend), [blshy]

-Vlad

187
Current Talk '02 I / My Ranking of Major Storylines
« on: February 13, 2002, 12:25:07 AM »
Originally posted by Vlad on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 12, 2002 at 18:25:07:

Here is my personal ranking of the major DS storylines, from favorite to least favorite. Some might not like the idea of a ranking, but I found it an interesting exercise - I really had to think about and evaluate each story, in accordance with my personal preferences. The categories are pretty much my own devising ¢â‚¬¦ others would categorize some storylines differently than I have. There is overlapping among various storylines, of course, so things don't always fit quite perfectly into little boxes like this. The "Dark Shadows Almanac" breaks down some of the storylines into smaller fragments than I think is necessary - e.g., they have "The Ghosts of Daphne and Gerard" as a separate storyline from "1840." I've also omitted a couple of storylines that were too minor for me to put in a ranking like this - e.g., "Return to 1796" and "Quentin and Amanda" (see the Dark Shadows Almanac).

1. 1840. Includes 1995 and Summer of 1970, as one cohesive unit.
2. 1795. (Coming up soon, newbies!)
3. Introduction of Barnabas. Includes kidnapping of Maggie, intro of Julia Hoffman.
4. 1897
5. Introduction of Quentin
6. Laura the Phoenix
7. 1841 Parallel Time
8. Introduction of Victoria Winters. Includes Burke Devlin story.
9. Cassandra and the Dream Curse
10. Leviathans
11. 1970 Parallel Time
12. Creation and Education of Adam
13. Jason McGuire/blackmailing of Elizabeth
14. Nicholas Blair, Introduction and machinations of. (Includes Eve story.)


Some further notes:

I group 1995, Summer of 1970, and 1840 as one storyline. It's an integrated story unit even though it spans three time periods. I find this to be the most intricately plotted AND cohesive storyline of all.

Some of my favorite moments from the series are undeniably in 1897. However, as a whole, I found the storyline to lose direction as it began to expand exponentially.

Perhaps the most traditional (classical, tasteful, whatever) storyline was 1795, but the taut jigsaw puzzle that was 1840 really kept my mind at work on several levels simultaneously!

Long-time posters might be surprised at my relatively high ranking of the Leviathan storyline. Although I found a stretch of episodes near the end of this storyline to be the worst executed of the entire series, as a whole I found it a fascinating and creative concept, and defended it as such on this board up until the very end. Taken as a whole, I still prefer it to several others.

-Vlad

188
Current Talk '02 I / Prediction re: New Series
« on: February 06, 2002, 12:31:18 AM »
Originally posted by Vlad on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 05, 2002 at 18:31:18:

This is rather hazardous, I know, but I was reading the "Dark Shadows Resurrected" book about the 1991 revival series, and Dan Curtis talked quite a bit about his plans for the 1991 series. Since those plans weren't realized when the show was cancelled after only 12 episodes, it seems likely that he would want to take them up again.

One thing Curtis mentioned was that there were several storylines in the original series that he liked and hoped to revamp for the new series. One that he specifically mentioned was the Quentin story, beginning with the two children talking with Quentin on the antique telephone in the West Wing.

That would be a great place (Quentin, West Wing) to start a new series! The storyline has *only* been done once before. :) It would give those of us who loved the original show the chance to see one of the best storylines in a fresh light; it would be "our" Dark Shadows, yet new.

The show could certainly go off in just about any direction from that point on -

Let's keep our fingers crossed -

- Vlad

189
Current Talk '02 I / Salem Witchcraft and Parker's Novel
« on: February 06, 2002, 12:28:48 AM »
Originally posted by Vlad on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 05, 2002 at 18:28:48:

About a year ago (by my best guess), we had a discussion on this board (I think I probably started it) about Lara Parker's intention to use the historical events at Salem as part of her next Dark Shadows novel. (We know that she is working on this novel, and that there are plans for it to be published by Tor Books).

In published remarks, Ms. Parker talked about Barnabas 'tripping' and about hallucinations leading to the witchcraft craze, based on a theory that the Salem incident was caused by a reaction to the ergot fungus on rye. I vehemently expressed my view that this theory was a lot of balderdash and hoped that Parker would change her mind about using it. One of my main objections was that the Salem case was just one case in the history of New England witch crazes, and those in America were a drop in the bucket of witch crazes spanning centuries in Europe. It seemed unlikely that this ergot fungus being present in bread would just happen to be the culprit on two contents and spanning hundreds of years, and always resulting in accusations of witchcraft.

Although I still have reservations about that theory, I'm not quite so ready to dismiss it after seeing a program on PBS's "Secrets of the Dead" series last week. The show was originally aired last season, though I had missed it then (and wasn't too concerned about having missed it since I knew it was promoting this theory). Well, anyway, this time I watched the show and I have to say that it was fascinating and that they presented a strong case. The psychologist who proposed the theory did a lot of research into diaries and other sources at the time and found a lot of references to people having strange hallucinations, etc. What's more, evidence of this fungus contamination was then found in Europe, answering one of my objections.

Although I'm not ready to eat my hat -- there were many gaps and inconsistencies that were not addressed in this program, and it's certainly not the last word on the subject -- I do want to express that I am more open-minded about the theory and the possibility of Ms. Parker using it in her novel.

- Vlad

190
Current Talk '02 I / Looking Ahead to 1897
« on: February 01, 2002, 01:48:59 AM »
Originally posted by Vlad on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on January 31, 2002 at 19:48:59:

For those who are interested in some of the literary sources that DS drew on during its run, a recent British production of "Nicholas Nickleby" aired on Bravo this week and will be repeated on Sunday during the day (in two two-hour episodes).

DS borrowed from an early section of the novel in its depiction of Rev. Trask's school (Worthington Hall?). I thank whoever pointed this out on the old board during the last airing of DS's 1897 storyline. I had forgotten about this until I sat down to watch my tape of Nicholas Nickleby (it aired during the presidential address Tuesday night and I'm sure it got *great* ratings ;) ). At first I thought, well maybe the DS writers said something like, "Hey, let's make this Rev. Trask's school like the one in Nicholas Nickleby," and I thought that might be the extent of it. As I watched, though, there were clear parallels between DS's Rachel Drummond and Tim Shaw (?) with Nicholas and his sister Kate Nickleby. It was interesting to see that, aside from the fact that it's a great production!

This was another reminder to me of how literate the DS writers often were, and how creative they could be in adapting material from a wide variety of sources and fitting it into a supernatural storyline. Not to mention that someone on the team had even read this early novel of Dickens, which wasn't widely known before the Tony Award-winning Broadway/Royal Shakespeare Company production in the late '70s.

- Vlad

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13