Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MsCriseyde

1246
Calendar Events / Announcements '04 I / Re:Chris Pennock in Hamlet
« on: May 12, 2004, 06:48:27 PM »
Well, what a slap at Sardi's!  ;D

I have never heard of a theatre using a sign to advertise that they've booted an artistic director. I could maybe understand using one to announce that they've hired a new artistic director thereby indirectly noting the axing of the previous one, but to flat out say they've canned someone . . . Geez.

1247
Calendar Events / Announcements '04 I / Re:Another DC Project
« on: May 10, 2004, 05:08:46 PM »
Late last week, it was announced that Brian Dennehy will join the cast of Our Fathers. You can read more about it here:

http://www.playbill.com/news/article/86057.html

1248
Current Talk '24 I / Re:WB ORDERS FILMING OF NEW DS PILOT
« on: May 03, 2004, 04:08:34 PM »
In the Innovation comic books based upon the 1991 remake, they showed what Barnabas looked like after having been trapped in a coffin with no blood supply for 172 years.

These guys bear a striking resemblance to my appearance in the morning after having been in bed for a few hours with no coffee supply.  ;D

1249
BTW, the online reviews for this film are somewhat mixed. The one I've found that specifically mentions David's performance also gives away the entire plot. So here's a link to it if you don't mind having the ending told to you.

And here's the part about David's performance, if you don't want to read the review:
Quote
The only interesting performance for me, and the only actor who seemed to give a damn about what he was doing on the screen, was DAVID SELBY (Quentin from "Dark Shadows") as a crusty old redneck landowner, trying to collect back rent from loser Viggo. He is old and broken, yet tough and craggy to the core. Sadly, he is on the screen for just a few seconds, and only in a wide master shot. There are no close-ups to get a better look at his work.

Umm, yeah, his work. That's what I wanted a better look at.  >:D

1250
Calendar Events / Announcements '04 I / New David Selby Film on DVD
« on: May 02, 2004, 08:16:06 PM »
In late 2002, it was reported that David Selby had a brief role in the film Topanga Canyon, which was retitled Topanga. In 2003, under the new title The Affair, the film began making rounds in independent film festivals.

The News page of the Official David Selby Web Site is reporting that The Affair is set to be released on DVD this month. The page includes a link to the film's official site.

1251
Just a few quick additions:

  • The News page now contains links to the two recent WVU press releases regarding David's honorary doctorate and commencement address.
  • The News page also contains information about Dark Shadows DVD Collection 13.
  • The TV Schedule and Radio Schedule pages are no longer being updated since the News page of DavidSelby.com now includes that information. Less work for me.  ;)
New information is accessible from the What's New section of the main page:
http://www.ldrservicesonline.com/davidselbysite

1252
Current Talk '04 I / Re:Are Focus Groups An Enemy Of Art?
« on: April 29, 2004, 03:11:12 AM »
Speaking of which, I just wish I had the opportunity to take part in your class that includes the reading of The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. It sounds like it would be fascinating.  [thumb]

Actually, it wasn't for a class. Stumbled across it while compiling my reading list for my PhD exams. I do a lot of stuff with concepts of exchange and reciprocity in Old English and Anglo-Latin literature, and so Hyde's text has to go on the list because he talks about the exchange of language for money which is somewhat related to issues that come up with the scop's (a scop is like a bard, sc pronounced as sh, the o is long) relationship with his lord.

Are we all bored now?   [rleyeg]

1253
Calendar Events / Announcements '04 I / Fest Videos
« on: April 29, 2004, 12:18:37 AM »
Following up on something that came up in a thread about Return to Collinwood regarding Festival videos. I don't have contact information for all the videographers, but I can direct you to one of their web sites:

http://drksone.0catch.com/fest_videos.htm

The page needs to be updated because he also has footage from the 2003 Fest.

There are a few other videographers, but I don't have contact info handy. Perhaps someone else can chime in here.

1254
Current Talk '04 I / Re:Are Focus Groups An Enemy Of Art?
« on: April 28, 2004, 10:07:12 PM »
I understood what you're saying and I respect it so far as marketing a commodity goes. But when it comes to a discussion of art, I think we're coming to the discussion from two opposing philosophical perspectives - perspectives that are probably bound to clash.

What you're getting at here, whether or not art is a commodity, is something that is discussed in one of the texts on my exam reading list. The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property by Lewis Hyde deals specifically with art as it fits into the gift vs. commodity scheme. The basic argument of the book:

"[T]here is an irreconcilable conflict between gift exchange and the market, and, [. . .] as a consequence, the artist in the modern world must suffer a constant tension between the gift sphere to which his work pertains and the market society which is his context."

I think focus groups are a manifestation of that tension, though Hyde is more concerned with writers like Walt Whitman and Ezra Pound, so he never specifically discusses them.

My point (do I have one?  ;D) is that what MB and victoriawinters are arguing here is an old and long debate. This isn't simply a product of Hollywood.

Ever since patronage has existed, whether or not an artist is compelled to manipulate his/her product to suit the whims of an audience or a financial backer has been an issue. Go back to a "pure" time when this didn't happen on any level, and you're likely to find an artist without means of distributing his/her work at all.

Does that mean I like what focus groups do and all the decisions they make? Not by any stretch of the imagination. But I think they're probably an unavoidable and necessary evil.  ::)

1255
Current Talk '04 I / Re:Are Focus Groups An Enemy Of Art?
« on: April 28, 2004, 03:35:56 PM »
The fact that a bunch of people taken off the street can have an actor's entire performance removed from a film or TV show, or they can force a scene to be completely rescored is a very sad commentary on the way films and TV shows are produced nowadays. Heaven forbid a character or a music cue produce an emotion that these people might not be comfortable with, or a story not conclude the way they think it should.

Though it was a product of screenings with preview audiences, so not as small as a focus group, one of the most notable instances of this that I'm familiar with, just so we have a concrete example on the table here, involves the conclusion to Fatal Attraction which had to be completely reshot.

Here's an explanation of the original ending, which was included as a bonus on some of the later video releases, courtesy of the IMDb:

[spoiler]Original ending had Alex committing suicide while dressed in white, and Dan being arrested for her murder. Dan's wife, while looking for the phone number of her husband's lawyer, finds a cassette tape recorded by Alex in which she states her intention to commit suicide. The wife runs out of the house with the tape (presumably going to the police) and the film ends with a flashback of Alex slashing her throat in the bathroom while listening to "Madama Butterfly".

When preview audiences hated this ending, a new one was shot (where Alex is killed by Dan's wife with a gun). The original ending still appears in the Japanese release and was added to the US video and laser editions.[/spoiler]

1256
The News page of the Official David Selby Web Site includes a link to another press release from WVU, issued today, about their upcoming commencement exercises. This one profiles the three people who will be receiving honorary doctorates, including David, and explains why they were selected for this distinction.

Striking good looks were not a criterion. Go figure.  ;D

1257
Looking for Richard has become standard viewing in a lot of graduate, undergraduate, and high school English courses since its release in 1996. Most likely, it'll hit DVD eventually.

Pacino comes across as a tad self-absorbed in the film, which provided a group of us in a grad course on Shakespeare with a fabulous opportunity to parody the film as part of a performance project. I hope the tapes have all been destroyed.  ;D

Some worthless trivia: The performance of Richard III in this film is staged at the Cloisters, the medieval branch of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, located in Fort Tryon Park in northern Manhattan.

1258
For those of you who have SoapNet, the current episodes of Ryan's Hope feature Dorrie Kavanaugh in the cast as Martha McKee, who is dallying, shall we say, with Jack Fenelli.

Kavanaugh appeared on DS as Phyliss Wicke.

This Ryan's Hope web site features screen grabs from an episode that aired recently on SoapNet:

http://members.tripod.com/RyansBarOnline/kavanaugh1.html

The grabs aren't the greatest, but I didn't recognize her until the closing credits, so I don't have any of my own to offer.  :)

Sadly, Dorrie Kavanaugh passed away in the early 1980s.


1259
Calendar Events / Announcements '04 I / Re:Chris Pennock in Hamlet
« on: April 24, 2004, 05:01:54 AM »
The rest is silence.  [chkyb]

1260
Calendar Events / Announcements '04 I / New Dan Curtis Interview
« on: April 24, 2004, 01:41:06 AM »
The April 19, 2004 edition of CableFAX's CableWorld includes an interview with Dan Curtis about his upcoming Showtime project, Our Fathers. He discusses his collaborations with Robert Cobert but does not specifically discuss DS.

Click here for the article.