But even in that case, wouldn't the more obvious assumption be that Vicki was insane rather than that Vicki was a witch? Wouldn't a reasonable, skeptical judge be more likely write out an order committing her to Windcliff or Rushmore Sanitarium or whatever version of Bedlam existed in 1795? The very idea of trying somebody for witchcraft in 18th Century America is what seems so absurd.
I'm not sure even a tame version of an 18th century insane asylum would be considered soap opera viewing material. The way the insane were treated (or not treated) in times past was pretty horrific.
If Vicki had been a member of the family, they would have just locked her up in the tower room or something!
![Smiley :)](http://www.dsboards.com/SMF/Smileys/classic/smiley.gif)
Protect the family name, you know.
I guess another WHAT??? moment from that same time period is how little sense it seemed to make to single out Vicki. True, she was the strange stranger, but absolutely NONE of the tragedies that befell the Collinses benefited her in any way. It just seems odd that in spite of the furor over Vicki the witch, even after she was in jail, that no one looked around and said, "Hey, Angelique seems to have gotten a lot out of this this whole witch thing, at the least I would have thought people might suspect they were in league.