Glad to see this topic - a good friend of mine gave me the DVDs of the revival series for Christmas and my husband and I recently watched the whole thing - one episode every Sunday night. Both of us enjoyed it so much. It gave my husband a better idea of what the overarching storyline is for the original series, and I think he's a bit more likely to watch the older show with me now!
The biggest disappointment of the show for both of us I think, was the constant day for night shots that I guess weren't correctly remastered for the dvd release. You could really see that California sunshine during many scenes that were supposed to be happening at night. Just killed the Gothic mood. And my husband remarked that since they were obviously using the Greystone Mansion for both Collinwood and the Old House, it was sometimes difficult for him to tell where the heck the action was supposed to be taking place.
On to the actors!
I thought Jim Fyfe as Willie was a little overdone, but he was lots of fun - though John Karlen will always be my fave! Jim was also good as Ben Loomis in 1790, and I thought brought some pathos to both roles.
Likewise, Lysette Anthony was over the top as Angelique, but in this case I didn't enjoy her very much. I know for lots of DS fans there is nothing to like about Lara Parker's Angelique, but I've always found her amusing and just riveting to watch. Despite her smoldering sensuality (which was on the plus side in my book) Lysette was kind of one-note (to me) in her approach to role and I didn't like the character. Still, hearing that she would have been Laura is a promising idea.
Agree with those who were loving Julianna McCarthy as Abigail - she was amazing! And for some reason, she really made me believe that she was a woman of the 18th century, I can't explain it, but she just seemed right.
Joanna Going was particularly lovely and affecting both as Vicki and as Josette, and I really liked how they changed it to Vicki/Josette - that worked well. Also quite liked the revamping of Maggie's character as a no-better-than-she-should-be village artist/psychic. It gave the character something special of her own to do. And if they'd ended up getting to the 1897 storyline, I would have loved to see that actress play Beth.
Have to say, Roger and Carolyn were both rather boring. Carolyn especially - and it seemed to me as if the actress who played her was, I dunno, maybe high
during the filiming of several episodes?
As others have said - though Barbara Steel played Julia as a rather different character than Grayson Hall (way more buttoned-up, icy and controlled), but in either series, this is my favorite character. IMHO, Steel was as fabulous as Dr. Julia Hoffman in her own way as Grayson was in hers.
Also on the plus side were Michael T. Weiss as Joe (v. sexy), Adrian Paul as Jeremiah, Jean Simmons as both Liz and Naomi, the little guy who played David/Daniel, Stefan Gierasch (sp?) as Joshua, and the gent who played Dr. Woodard.
My big question is where was Prof. Stokes? I have to believe they'd have tried to bring this character on in season 2, had they not been cancelled. Sarah Collins was a more natural actress than the little girl who played in the 60's version, and I thought Roy Thinnes Trask, though very different, was appropriately mad and vicious.
On the minus side, the character of Daphne was pretty stale and one-dimensional, and they didn't do anything with Sam Evans. Maybe they just didn't have time.
Ben Cross generally looked right as Barnabas, but yeah, there was way too much snarling and mugging at the camera while dressed up in that hideous white make-up. For some reason, he didn't seem as courtly as Jonathan Frid in the role, but he was a good choice for the role. He and Joanna Going had good chemistry as a couple, and I loved this twist in the revival -
[spoiler]that when Vicki returned from 1790, she knew Barnabas was a vampire.[/spoiler]
I wonder where they would have gone with that?