Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Gerard

3661
Current Talk '02 I / Re: "That 'place' in Brazil...?"
« on: February 06, 2002, 09:12:20 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on February 06, 2002 at 15:12:20:

I actually thought that that was one of the most "natural" bloopers ever on the show. It actually did fit! I can easily see somebody, including Liz, getting all flustered because of the seriousness of the situation. If it wasn't a blooper, then somebody did some real fine writin', and Joan Bennet did some real fine actin'.

Gerard

3662
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Prediction re: New Series
« on: February 06, 2002, 06:32:15 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on February 06, 2002 at 12:32:15:
In Reply to: Re: Prediction re: New Series posted by Joeytrom:

The Ross novels (may he rest in peace - yes, "Marilyn Ross" was a man) are a fantastic source of plots and storylines, and if the hopefully re-reconstituted novel series does actually get off the ground, there you go with some more. Even "Angelique's Descent" by Miss Parker would make an intriguing tele-filmed story.

Gerard

3663
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Prediction New Series
« on: February 06, 2002, 04:02:35 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on February 06, 2002 at 10:02:35:

Luciaphil's
Quote
Having more than the three extras in the courtroom is great, but you still had people who dimly remembered their high school history and were questioning witchcraft trials at the dawn of the 19th century.

You know, that always bothered me. Certainly, no one would be tried for witchcraft as the nineteenth century was dawning. Salem took care of that a century earlier.

However.....they could use the witchcraft angle and make it plausible, even in the context of a crime and trial. Vicki (or Phyllis Wick) could not be tried for witchcraft in the 1790's (practicing it was not a crime at that time), but she could be tried for murder, and the weapon being witchcraft. Now, they could bring in the whole controversy, even back then, if there is any such thing, but Trask could use his wiles ala LA Law, twisting evidence, blah-blah-blah, to make Vicki (or Phyllis) look guilty.

Gerard

3664
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Prediction New Series
« on: February 06, 2002, 03:54:43 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on February 06, 2002 at 09:54:43:
In Reply to: Re: Prediction re: New Series posted by joe integlia:

You know, I could go either way on how to do a possible new series: remake, or next generation. There are plusses and problems with both.

As for the former, even though I didn't like the '91 remake, I was awed by Jean Simmons, so I could see how it could work if done right. They don't necessarily have to redo all the original stories, and the ones they do remake, they can remove all the inconsistencies that happened with the original series.

I can see them even starting it with a retelling of the Vicki-and-Burke-arrives-Roger-is-scared-David's-trying-to-kill-him-Matthew-is-killing-everyone story, more compact, but it could be utilized to "introduce" the history of the family (kinda like Elizabeth doing a Jackie Kennedy tour of the White House with Vicki, pointing out portraits of this ancestor and that ancestor, including you-know-who).

If they retell the Quentin story, by wanting to keep it in the proximity of the present day characters (Jamison was the father of Elizabeth and Roger), they would have to "move it up", at least into the 1920's. Now, as much as we loved the 1890's Victorian element, I think that would be really neat. The clothing, music, dancing, all that from the 20's. Edward would be friends with Joe Kennedy; Quentin would get his kicks from helping Prohibition-era rum-runners; you'd have speak-easies, gangsters (what an angle!), and Pansy Faye wouldn't be a dance hall hoochy-koochy girl - she'd be a flapper wanting to break into the movies. What a riot!

As for the latter, a next generation would be a stitch as well. Of course, the problem - as pointed out - is that many of the original characters would still be hanging around. Carolyn as the mistress of Collinwood, absolutely, but would Nancy Barrett want to reprise the role? David married with kids, sharing ownership and operation of Collinwood and the family businesses, but would David Henesey return? I doubt that one. Would we accept new actors and actresses, who might look and sound somewhat like them, playing the parts? Well, if we accepted the second Darren, maybe it would work. And there are a myriad of storyline possibilities. I can think of a bunch right now.

Gerard

3665
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 I / Re: TLATKLS on Matlock - NOW!
« on: February 04, 2002, 04:48:40 PM »
Posted by Gerard on February 04, 2002 at 10:48:40:
In Reply to: Re: TLATKLS on Matlock - NOW! Followed by R. Davis posted by RingoCollins on February 01, 2002 at 20:02:15:

I'm gonna hafta look for that episode sometime, Ringo, if the series is aired again (I'm sure it will be). But then, I'm not very good with passing out with the vapors.

Gerard

3666
Current Talk '02 I / Re: The Original Idea for 1795
« on: February 04, 2002, 04:44:55 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 04, 2002 at 10:44:55:

I always thought it would've been interesting if they would have told the 1795/96 storyline without [spoiler]Vicki being metaphysically thrust back to that era. For example, just having Barnabas begin to tell Julia about those events - screen swirls and swirls - and, voila, there we are for the next several months. Alexandra Moltke could have just played Phyllis Wick. Of course, then Vicki would not have met Peter Bradford and blah-blah-blah, you know the rest.[/spoiler]

Gerard

3667
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 I / Re: TLATKLS Alert
« on: February 03, 2002, 12:33:54 AM »
Posted by Gerard on February 02, 2002 at 18:33:54:
In Reply to: Re: TLATKLS Alert posted by Bob the Bartender on February 02, 2002 at 17:44:42:

Wow, Bob, how many times I've seen that movie (once when it first came out in the theaters back in '71, and then several times on video) and I never, ever took notice of that! And how many times have I crossed that bridge whilst on holiday there. I just put it on and fast-forwarded to it and - sure 'nuff - there it is! But then, in the '90 prime-time remake, we had to endure palm trees in Collinsport, Maine.

Gerard

3668
Current Talk '02 I / Re: My Apology to the Board
« on: February 03, 2002, 12:28:39 AM »
Posted by Gerard on February 02, 2002 at 18:28:39:
In Reply to: My Apology to the Board posted by Donna on February 02, 2002 at 15:49:03:

My thoughts are with you and your ex-husband and your family during what must be a very trying time for you, Donna! Wish there was something we could all do to help!

Gerard

3669
Calendar Events / Announcements '02 I / TLATKLS Alert
« on: February 02, 2002, 09:47:41 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 02, 2002 at 15:47:41:

"The Great Gatsby", 1974, with The Lovely and Talented Kathryn Leigh Scott (and a buncha other nobodies like Robert Redsomething and Mia Farrother) will air on AMC Sunday evening, 8:00 p.m. east, 7:00 p.m. central. Of course, that'll be opposite the Stupor Bowl, but who watches that?

Gerard

3670
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Where o where...
« on: February 01, 2002, 04:37:12 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 01, 2002 at 10:37:12:

Quote
Has Carolyn been?

I always use my imagination to figure out where they are or what they're doing when they've been absent for awhile, Patti. In this case, I figure Carolyn had some tragedy with her hair and had to go to a specialist in Boston to bring things back to straights.

Gerard

3671
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Looking Ahead to Quentin
« on: February 01, 2002, 04:32:53 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on February 01, 2002 at 10:32:53:

All I can picture is a scene - if Burke and Vicki had decided to move in and in the remodeling process, discover that skeleton - with Jack Lemmon and Sandy Dennis from "The Out-of-Towners", Vicki standing there, saying nasally: "Ooooh, mmmyyy God!"

Gerard

3672
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Sign O The Times
« on: January 31, 2002, 12:53:53 AM »
Originally posted by Gerard on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on January 30, 2002 at 18:53:53:
In Reply to: Re: Sign O The Times posted by Birdie on January 30, 2002 at 18:30:13:

My mother wore out an old purse strap on me - I was a very precocious child who knew how to push buttons. She then used an old belt. A coupla months ago, as I was going through the old homestead, cleaning it out, I found that belt still hanging in its place of honor in the kitchen broom closet.

My dad, too, rarely gave us a lickin' because he was usually at work when we would try to do things like burn down the house or stuff the pet parakeet into the dog. But if he did catch us doing such darling, little things, he would give it just as good as our mom. I always prefered the spanking method as it got it over with in a matter of seconds (and to be perfectly honest, our pride was hurt more than our butts by the lickin'). The kids who really did suffer were the ones who got grounded or were denied things like watching their favorite shows or going to the movies. Their punishment lingered, sometimes for weeks, while ours would smart for a coupla minutes, and then it would be over.

Gerard

3673
Current Talk '02 I / Re: Sign O The Times
« on: January 29, 2002, 11:24:52 PM »
Originally posted by Gerard on the Dark Shadows: General Discussion Forum on January 29, 2002 at 17:24:52:

I was the same age as David back then, Patti, and from my own experiences I would say that many, many parents would've whole-heartedly endorsed Barnabas taking a shine to David's hiney. Not only did parents wallop their kids publicly back then without fear (they were looked at with cutting eyes if they didn't when their precious, little darlings acted up), but it was not uncommon for strangers to do some on-the-spot disciplining. They didn't necessarily give 'em a lickin', but they certainly would give a good tongue-lashing, made all the more potent by finger-wagging.

As for Liz holding the purse-strings with regards to David, overruling his father, it was obvious that she wore the pants in that family (even though we never saw her in slacks).

Gerard

3674
Current Talk '02 I / Re: New DS series???
« on: January 29, 2002, 09:08:21 PM »
Posted by Gerard on January 29, 2002 at 15:08:21:
In Reply to: New DS series??? posted by Linda on January 29, 2002 at 10:21:05:

Linda, I just gotta agree with you. I did NOT enjoy the 1990 prime-time remake (save for Jean Simmons, who made an Elizabeth Collins Stoddard as classy and regal as Joan Bennett). It was, for the most part, poorly written and lacked the subtlety of the original. And thinking of Maggie having an affair with Roger, well, I can't even think about it because I'll become verklempfed. And while the original could be excused for its many bloopers, there simply was no excuse for a series with a multi-million dollar budget, supposedly set in Maine, having palm trees swing into scenes (I know that's a small thing, but it irked me to no end). If there is the chance for a new series, and I hope so, you are so right ----- please, Mr. Curtis, leave the writing to the writers, use what worked in the way of approach from the original, and definitely learn from the mistakes of the first prime-time repeat attempt.

Gerard

3675
Current Talk '02 I / Re:Roger Davis fanclub
« on: January 29, 2002, 08:56:50 PM »
Posted by Gerard on January 29, 2002 at 14:56:50:
In Reply to: Re: Roger Davis fanclub posted by Birdie on January 29, 2002 at 10:55:14:

I think Davis' problem was that he was not a very good short study. He obviously had difficulty remembering his lines, and was one of the few who allowed the flubs, falling props, missed lines, etc., to visibly distract and frustrate him. Undoubtedly, it was not easy for him to do a fast-paced show like DS, which - being "live-on-tape" - was virtually live; that is an awful lot of pressure. Whenever he appeared on programs or in movies where the director could call "cut" and reshoot until it was done right, he was far better (and I'm sure that, with some of the pressure off, mixed with being able to stop and reshoot, he was able to put in a more superior performance). He was fine, putting in a decent performance in "House of Dark Shadows"; I also recall him in other filmed projects, including an old "Twilight Zone" episode, where he exhibited a knack and talent for his craft.

Gerard