3316
Current Talk '02 II / Re: Time Paradoxes--1795 & 1897!
« on: October 29, 2002, 04:41:03 AM »Quote
Now, for 1897! Barnabas goes back to the past to save David...and completely changes the timeline. If that were the case, wouldn't Janet Findley still be living when he returned to 1969? And how about old Ezra? He'd be living, too, correct?You are absolutely right. If Barnabas had changed history, there never would've been a haunting of Collinwood in 1968/69. Okay, for now, let's forget the whole thing about you-can't-change-history (e.g., if you went back to April 14, 1912 and convinced Captain Smith to do what was needed to avoid the iceberg, thus the Titanic would never've sunk, she would still've sunk, because since she didn't, you wouldn't know to go back to 4/14/12 to prevent her from striking the iceberg, blah-blah-blah). Let's say that Barnabas
Let's hear your take on all this!
Rod
[spoiler]and Julia did change history and returned to their own time of 1969, discovering that no haunting ever took place, no one has memory of it since it never happened, but they remember the alternate time line because, through their time-travels, they are somehow "protected" from forgetting.
Now here comes another SPOILER.
The biggest paradox should've happened with the 1840/41 storyline because that is where history was REALLY changed. In the unchanged history, Gabriel (and Edith) becomes the master of Collinwood, and the lineage passes through him (Gabriel/Edith; unknown children; Edward/Lara, siblings; Jamison/unknown-wife, Norah; Elizabeth and Roger). BUT..........because Barnabas (and Julia and Eliot) change history, they change the lineage to pass through Quentin I and his son Tad, thus completely changing the progeny/descendents. When Barnabas, Julia and Eliot returned to 1971, they should've found a completely different family living there. By the way, if the series had continued, that would've made a fascinating storyline, somehow getting our three heroes to restore the original line.[/spoiler]
Gerard