Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Brandon Collins

286
I read an article in TV Guide for the revival series in 1991....Ben Cross confessed that he had never seen the original show, nor did he have any desire to.  Then why the heck did he choose to appear in the show then?

This is understandble to me. I'm sure you've heard of a situation before where a actor is stepping into a role in a remake of something, and they don't watch or study the original work by the original actor because they don't want to completely copy the original actors style. Cross probably was hinting at that as the reason why he didn't want to watch the original series.

287
Current Talk '08 I / Re: the dinner party
« on: March 25, 2008, 03:31:20 AM »
I still can't get over just how atmosphereic the show is during these episodes. I mean, talk about great lighting, writing, set design, acting, directing, producing et all! The show really took a downturn when it started to hit its stride in terms of production values. The camera work is infinitely better than the later days, where everything seemed to be rushed.

288
Current Talk '08 I / Re: the dinner party
« on: March 24, 2008, 10:59:56 PM »
It is infinitely easier to sympathize with the characters during these episodes. I haven't even finished watching the first set yet (a result of my overzealousness at rewatching ALL of my boxsets), and I can already start to feel for Vicki and how she's being treated by the very people who hired her! She's naturally curious about her surroundings, but all Liz and Roger want to do is to hush up all the secrets and keep everyone in the dark! And Carolyn is the only one who seems to be on the same page as Vicki, but has probably a little more information because she's lived there her entire life.

I just recently watched the episode where Vicki goes to Matthew's cottage and attempts to probe him for information. Matthew gets a call from Liz asking him to bring some firewood into the house, and he mentions that he's there talking to Vicki. Apparently, from Matthew's reaction after he hangs up, Liz has forbidden Vicki from even visiting Matthew (why they're both servants for Chrissakes!) and Matthew gets very upset that Vicki might have gotten him in trouble. I was fully expecting a scene where Liz gives Vicki a severe tongue lashing, but it never came.

289
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Barnabas and Sabrina Stuart
« on: March 24, 2008, 10:49:44 PM »
I would also tend to agree that when Barnabas "vanished" into PT, his hold over Sabrina vanished. Of course, she could've always left to go look for Barnabas, and Chris and Amy went along for the ride for whatever reason.

The power a vampire has over their victim, in the DS world anyway, I think has a lot to do with what the vampires intentions are for the victim. If the vamp bites the vic because they need a servant, than the vic will be practically a slave to the vamp's will--just like Willie was at first. If the vamp just needs a quick bite to eat, then the vic will have some loyalty to the vamp, but will not throw themselves in front of the train to get to the vamp, unless, of course, the vamp is summoning their victim. And if the vamp bites the vic in order to keep them quiet and place them under control to prevent them from spoiling some secret, then its a mix of the two.

290
Well, in the show Gabriel and Edith's children have been shipped off to boarding school. They're never shown, and hardly ever mentioned. In the 30th Anniversary of the DS Almanac, it says that Gabriel and Edith have three children, only one of whom married (all of whom are labeled as "Unknown" including the married one's spouse). The married child has Edward, Judith, Carl, and Quentin as children. So, it's possible, I would assume, that the "Thaddeus Collins" that David mentions, COULD be one of Gabriel's children.

Their ages would've been a bit wonky, but it would've worked because back then they had children at a young age.

291
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Greg Trask and Rachel
« on: March 23, 2008, 03:58:58 AM »
I think it was HEAVILY implied that Gregory Trask was a child molestor, but the only reason they couldn't practically show it was because of the time it was shown in. For some reason this topic dredges up faint memories of some other molestation themed thing---

AND OMG MY BRAIN IS WORKING

The same thing was implied when (SPOILER):


We see Longworth in 1970PT, and his oogling over Maggie when he captures her. It practically screams rape.

292
Well, I attempted to modify my above post, but apparently an "error" occured. SO:

What I was going to say in addition was that you raise a very vaild point, MB, in that Angelique never really had the chance to harm Julia until 1840, which by our timeline was late in her career, but by her timeline was still very early. But, I still think there was some sort of divine intervention, apart from the writers (because they clearly missed some dramatic gold!), because even though Angelique was under Nicholas' control for a while there, she didn't seem like the type to follow orders if it didn't suit her needs. I mean, it seems to me, anyway, like she disobeyed Diabolis a number of times, but when Nikolas was around, she followed him. So does that mean that Nicholas was more powerful than Diabolis, perhaps the Devil Incarnate?

293
It wasn't until Angelique encountered Julia in 1840 that the perfect opportunity presented itself to harm her. And also, that Angelique was much more closely related to the Angelique of 1795/96 who lashed out at everyone around her. For the most part, the Angelique of 1897 and Leviathans had exhibited a much more mature persona.

GASP! Are you saying, that after nearly 400 years, that Angelique was mature enough to live in the world freely?!

294
I, myself, am actually enjoying the pre-Barnabas episodes much more than I did when I first saw them. Now that I've seen the entire run of DS, the supernatural-edition, several times, I find the non-supernatural early days refreshing for the series, not to mention that all the characters are their own people, with vigor, opinions, and hutzpah ta boot!

295
While it's true that Angelique leaving Julia to die in that little room, then to be turned into a vampire is HORRIBLE, that is perhaps the worst thing that she did to Julia. She also inflicted the Dream Curse on her in present time, as Cassandra, but that's not so horrible. Tell someone and you're done!

BUT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE SCALE YOU HAVE

Naomi's Death.

Sarah's Death.

Josette's Death.

Jeremiah betraying Barnabas.

Maggie Evans being tormented because Barn fancied her.

The entire present day family suffering from the Dream Curse.

Anglique framing Vicki for being a witch, because A) it was convenient, and B) because Barnabas was focusing on getting her found not guilty.

And I'm sure I missed many more.


My original comment was not to imply that Angelique never did anything to Julia, but, given that Julia bitch slapped her, and confronted her several times, and was always hanging on Barnabas like a rag doll, and was always helping Barnabas thwart Angelique's latest plan, and was constantly throwing her hands up and screaming "Oh-oh Bar-na-bas Nooooooooooo!!!!!!! Uh-uh-uh-uh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", Angelique should've done MORE to her, since Julia obviously was smitten.

296
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Old movie?
« on: March 19, 2008, 05:09:09 AM »
Ok. That's what I thought. I thought maybe I was going crazy since no one had mentioned that yet.

297
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Barnabas and Reverend Trask...
« on: March 19, 2008, 05:06:40 AM »
Obviously all the Trasks were flawed in their own ways. They each thought they were doing something that was "Gods" work.

Rev. Trask was hunting witches, and it was his objective to find them guilty no matter what it took, because that is what "God" wanted him to do. There was no place for witches in the world, so they had to be found out and hanged.

Greg Trask was doing "Gods" work in educating the children of the village to love and respect their elders, as well as respecting "God". He could rationalize that his deeds were committed for the good of the children because people like Minerva, with her constant probing, were hindering him from doing his job of educating the village. And Greg's forcing Judith to marry him could be seen as his wish to get hold of the most powerful name in the town, so that he could open up his school once again, and continue preaching "Gods" word to everyone.

Lamar, however, was putting people to rest. No matter their sins throughout life, he would bury there honorably, just as "God" would have wanted. Lamar wanted to pin the witchcraft of the town on Quentin because he was influenced by Gerudah (Gerard/Judah), and he believed that ridding the town of the witchcraft would prevent his dead corpse's from rising as zombie's and killing him.

Okay, so the last one is a bit of the stretch, but I'm hazy on the details of what all Lamar did.

My basic point is that they all believed themselves to be good people, who could rationalize what they were doing as being the work of their "God", whoever that may or may not have been. It's quite possible that they were all very much insane, hearing "God's" voice in their head from time to time. I agree with Magnus Trask that the Trask's attempted to rationalize their actions in their mind, but do I think they were evil? Hmm, not necessarily. I think it was more that they were lead down the wrong path initially, and found it hard to deviate from that path because they so devoutly believed in what they were doing. Most, if not all, of the acts they committed were hateful and wrong, and yea, they were pretty bad, but I think that evil is a term that is heavily over used in the place of "bad". So defining them as one or the other (good v. evil) is a tough call.

298
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Favorite ending to an episode....
« on: March 19, 2008, 04:46:27 AM »
I also LOVE LOVE LOVE the episode that ends with Quentin's ghost laughing and having free reign over Collinwood. The room-to-room shots showing that the entire house is empty is one of the best sequences ever in DS.

I also liked when Charity staked Barnabas. I thought that was VERY final.

And I'm not sure if an episode ended on this or not, but another favorite scene of mine is when it is revealed that Angelique created a mirror-double for Barnabas in 1897 so that he could be staked by Charity, be dead, then come back and say he was another Barnabas.

299
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Old movie?
« on: March 18, 2008, 04:55:07 PM »
Didn't they show this Darkness at Blaisedon movie at last years fest, and the year before that?

300
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Another thing to think about....
« on: March 18, 2008, 04:34:40 PM »
I, myself, have always wondered about the conundrom that is B, J, and E returning to 1971 and having Liz act like they were there all along. The only explanation for it is that they must've returned to an alternate timeline, and therefore the three of them WERE there the entire time, having never gone back in time to right everything in 1840, since none of that ever happened.

I'm more with arashi these days though, because delving too deep into this stuff can really confuse you about what's going on with who and where.

And I've always thought that the two Roxanne's were one and the same. It makes total sense.