Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nelson Collins

166
Current Talk '08 II / Re: DS Redux: Your Vision?
« on: August 28, 2008, 03:58:40 PM »
This is me thinking that if they a DS Next Gen series was done, a storyline I would love to see is someone finding Quentin's portrait (an enemy/villain, perhaps) and destroying or damaging it, necessitating a rapidly aging Quentin to return to Collinsport.  Of course the damage would be halted, the villain stopped, but not soon enough to reverse the partial ravages of age.  David Selby (should he be interested) could remain on the show or a as a recurring guest star....

167
Current Talk '08 II / Re: DS Redux: Your Vision?
« on: August 27, 2008, 02:50:21 PM »
Continuing the vampire man on man meme.... 

Apropos of nothing at all, I noticed that (while the act is not shown) we see bleeding fang marks on Sandor's neck when I was first watching 1897.  Remembering that Barn had bit Willie on the wrist, I couldn't help thinking at the time "so, he likes 'em big and swarthy...."  [ghost_cheesy]

168
Current Talk '08 II / Re: Who was the HOTTEST female on the original DS?
« on: August 26, 2008, 05:18:32 PM »
Grayson Hall post 1795, when she stopped wearing that frumpy wig. 

Grayson Hall when she was under the thrall of Tom Jennings.

Joan Bennett anytime, but especially the first couple of episodes in that black gown dripping with diamonds  (I am reminded of an image someone here placed in my mind sometime ago of Liz, in that outfit grilling hot dogs.  "Spearing a recalcitrant frank" I think was the phrase! LOL)

Maggie was quite hot when she quarreled with Joe (when he was under Angelique's power),  and when he asked her where she wanted to go for dinner, she shot back "Somewhere they serve baby food!"

Vampire Ang was hot.

Kate Jackson I will always have a soft spot for.  She was always my favorite Angel.



169
Current Talk '08 II / Re: DS Redux: Your Vision?
« on: August 26, 2008, 02:50:13 PM »
I am sure half the board will not agree with me but I thought Ben Cross was very elegant.
I agree he was elegant and while in the main, I was satisfied with his portrayal, my only real criticism would be that he tended to chew the scenery as much as he chew the ingenues' necks, especially when he had the contacts and the fangs in...

170
Current Talk '08 II / Re: DS Redux: Your Vision?
« on: August 26, 2008, 02:45:52 PM »
Ben Cross was, no offense meant, too short to play Barnabas. 
Possibly, but it might have been more historically accurate.  People on the whole were shorter in the 18th century than now. 

One of my favorite book series are the Saint Germain chronicles by Chelsea Quinn Yarbro, and one of the things I love about her series is that her 4000 year old vampire Le Comte de Saint Germain, is described as a tall man in the book set in Nero's Rome, but in moderns times is actually quite short.

171
Current Talk '08 II / Re: DS Redux: Your Vision?
« on: August 22, 2008, 02:56:51 PM »
I must confess I think I would enjoy a reboot as well as a continuation.  The New Doctor Who Series, I think, kind of gives one the best of both those worlds.  However, I think if a new DS series were to be mooted here and now, a reboot would be the best option.  ST:TNG I think succeeded not only because of the success of TOS in syndication, but also because by the time TNG was broadcast, the show had also enjoyed 4 (or 5) successful feature films that reached a broad audience and familiarized the concept of the show.

Unfortunately, and as others have pointed out,  in that respect DS is probably more similar to Battlestar Galactica, which I'm told, as I have never watched either version, the reboot is a great success.

So, reboot?  Bring it on!

OTOH, how about a few DS films with Depp and co.  set in the 60-70s, followed by a modern "continuation" on prime time TV? [ghost_tongue2] Perhaps exec produced by Burton or Depp?

172
Are there any pictures or still of said Jacket?

173
Current Talk '08 II / Re: DS Redux: Your Vision?
« on: August 20, 2008, 12:23:12 AM »
Of that list, Zahir, I only recognize Amber Benson, James Spader, and Jonathan Rhys Myers. :)  Gods, I feel old...or maybe I am just too disconnected with current pop culture....

174
Current Talk '08 II / Re: DS Redux: Your Vision?
« on: August 19, 2008, 03:24:05 AM »
I like your ideas, Zahir, but I have to come down on the side of Cousins Magnus and Goober (wow, there's a sentence you don't read every day :) ).  I'd much prefer a "Next Generation" take on a new series, either daytime or prime time.

I've jotted notes for such a beast myself, beginning right after the funeral of Elizabeth, who find found some personal happiness and lived to a ripe old and peaceful age.  I think I may have used Sam Hall's TV Guide "epilogue" to the series as a starting point and then flashed forward to the modern time.  It's been a while since I dug up those notes... :)

175
Current Talk '08 II / Re: I Annoy Barnabas
« on: August 19, 2008, 02:02:24 AM »
A long but narrow enclosed area housing a vampire or ex-vampire or once and future vampire...sounds to me like
[spoiler]a coffin.[/spoiler]
If so, Barnabas it must have been built by the same architect that built Snoopy's Doghouse!
 [ghost_cheesy]

176
Current Talk '08 I / Re: Why was Phyllis Wick tried for witchraft?
« on: March 06, 2008, 08:57:10 PM »
ISTR Barnabas recognizing Phyllis when time was unfrozen in the present, after the swap back and Vickie returns, does Barnabas still remember Phyllis? or Vickie?  Is it ever made clear?  Cassandralique remembers Vickie, does she not?

Likewise, I thought it had been established/remembered by Barnabas thas Phyllis was tried for witchcraft.  Am I mistaken?

177
Current Talk '08 I / Re: DVD collections....
« on: March 06, 2008, 08:50:22 PM »
Yes they will. If you call MPI's 800 number and ask they will send you the 10 thinner cases and the thinner cover art  for vol 1-10. They charged me around $35 for all of it.
Just placed my order!  Woohoo!

Thanks for the tip.  $36.95  [headbang]

178
Calendar Events / Announcements '08 I / Re: Shadowgram Update #181
« on: February 22, 2008, 11:54:11 PM »
Please, what is this "lost 1968 script"?

179
Current Talk '08 I / Re: The Old House - HOW big?
« on: February 13, 2008, 08:19:09 PM »
ooh!  Please do! :)

180
Current Talk '08 I / The Old House - HOW big?
« on: February 12, 2008, 11:36:15 PM »
I was having a slow day at work and started doodling a layout of the Old House to see if I could get it to conform (roughly) to the exteriors.  and I suddenly realized that the place would have had to have had to be enourmous.  In 1795 for example we have:

The Residents
Joshua/Naomi
Jeremiah
Abigail
Barnabas
Sarah

The New Yorkers
Millicent
Daniel

The Guests
Andre
Nathalie
Josette

The Staff
Angelique
Vicki

That's twelve bedrooms.  And of course that doesn't even begin to include the number of servants they must have employed or had endentured (wasn't Ben endentured?) to keep up a household of that many.  Obviously, apart from Angelique (as Josette's maid) and Vicki as governess, all the other staff must have been housed in quarters separate from the main building.

Is anyone familiar with the standard layout of homes at that time?  Would the kitchens have been part of the main house or a separate outbuilding adjacent?  Would servants quarters be a part of that building?  I suppose there would have been room to take the monthly bath :), but there wouldn't be any toilet facilities at the time, which would have consisted of chamberpot and the necessary house in the garden?

Working on plans for my country home that will look quite similar to the Old House,
Nelson