Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MysticScribe

Pages: « 1 2
16
Current Talk '12 I / Re: The three finalists for the role of Barnabas
« on: April 28, 2012, 03:48:36 PM »
I liked Bert Convy best in Roger Corman's A Bucket of Blood (a low budget classic). He played an undercover narco cop in a beatnik coffee shop and was offed via a frying pan to the head.

17
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0196
« on: April 24, 2012, 03:40:13 PM »
Magnus, I'm anxiously awaiting the arrival of that character you mentioned.  More specifically, that particular actor.

18
I haven't been watching much TV or actively seeking out trailers, but I saw one last night with some things that I haven't seen mentioned here. One is Liz with the shotgun and the other shows Barnabas standing with his back or shoulders on fire. Someone offscreen (Liz, perhaps) says "do you know you're on fire?" then he's doused with a bucket of water.

19
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0191
« on: April 17, 2012, 10:50:31 PM »
You're absolutely right, Magnus. In such a harrowing situation, Vicki's only thought was to get David out, simply stating what would happen if he stayed, but not wanting him to panic. I guess I'd make a lousy governess during a crisis.

Your encouraging the over analyzing is a kind indulgence.

20
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0190
« on: April 17, 2012, 04:25:41 PM »
[spoiler]I  forget the exact circumstances as to why she was so weak.  I think Quentin had destroyed the container in which she kept a flame.[/spoiler]

[spoiler]If I recall correctly, Dirk got the urn back at some point. A bit later, Barnabas had Magda steal the Egyptian scarab from the cottage and that's when Laura grew very weak. Barnabas then instructed Edward to extinguish every fire in Collinwood in the hopes of killing her.[/spoiler]

21
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0191
« on: April 17, 2012, 04:05:42 PM »
I liked the idea of the cross-cutting, but I think the show's live-on-tape format limited its effectiveness. If they'd had the luxury of editing and re-takes, it would have been tighter.

Vicki, Laura and David had a lot of repetitive dialogue that grew too tedious for me and raised several questions. Why didn't Vicki try to break or pry off the boards on the window? Why didn't she remind David of the people who cared about him, his family and Burke? Why didn't she tell him that his protector, Josette, had warned and guided her to the shack? I'm sure the gruesome details of what happens when you're burned alive were verboten under ABC's S&P policy.

I really liked Joan Bennett in this episode, very enjoyable performance. Coming out of her catatonia, Liz's first thought was of David and his safety, a nice contrast to Laura's seemingly destructive interest in him. If you want to get analytical and philosophical about it (which I admit I'm prone to do), you could say it shows that one needs more than maternal love to be adjusted and healthy. Liz's familial love was selfless, while Laura's maternal love was seemingly self-serving and literally smothering.

22
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0190
« on: April 16, 2012, 10:48:10 PM »
Good thing Burke and Joe aren't in law enforcement, because that was one lousy search of the fishing shack. I mean, it's David they're looking for, after all.

I suppose the men searching, the women fretting and Vicki communicating with Josette was meant to heighten the tension/suspense, but it kind of misfired (no pun intended). I've never been keen on this story line, I'm glad it's winding down.

Quote
It's almost like an episode of Lassie, but without Lassie
"What? What's that, Josie? Davey's stuck in a burning shack?"

23
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0181
« on: April 11, 2012, 11:44:28 PM »
Quote
Joe does some sleuthing and finds the article.

Haskell, P.I. (or is that P.I. Joe?) works the Radcliff case. He gets $50.00 a day, plus expenses.

24
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0186
« on: April 11, 2012, 05:04:33 PM »
Quote
Interesting that every century, some unsuspecting couple in the Murdoch family had a daughter, who they had no idea was really a Phoenix!  Perhaps they are another cursed family.
Good thought. DS mined just about everything, why not mythology? The gods were always siring offspring with mortal humans and another angry god or goddess would take out their ire on the child in some way.

25
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0187
« on: April 11, 2012, 04:52:32 PM »
A slower, quieter episode, but not without its merits. I really liked Mitch Ryan and Louis Edmonds in this one.

Roger, subdued and a bit thoughtful at the news of Guthrie's death. He may not have liked the man, but he certainly didn't want to see him dead. With a minimum of fuss, Burke and Roger were able to call a temporary truce for the benefit of a child they both cared about. When it was agreed that David needed to be taken away for a time and Laura needed to go permanently, I liked how Roger firmly stated both were his responsibility, but was unable to do both simultaneously. With no fuss, he accepted Burke's help.

I liked the little quip about lodging a complaint with Mrs. J about the lack of whip cream. It was so Roger (and very Marmorstein).

When proposing the fishing trip to David, both men had a relaxed attitude, out of necessity. We've always seen such animosity between the two, it was like getting a glimpse of their former friendship. Despite David's initial unwillingness, Roger and Burke remained calm, though you could see Burke's frustration and his quick thinking to make the trip more enticing.

I always liked Swift's directing of quiet relationship scenes, whether it involved family or romantic pairings.

26
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0186
« on: April 11, 2012, 12:01:21 AM »
Thanks MB and Magnus for the welcome. I've read some interesting, insightful and entertaining posts and have wanted to jump in for a while.

Laura is difficult to figure out. She engages in such harmful, destructive actions to whomever gets in her way, but there could be so much more beneath the surface. Although a great concept, I didn't care much for the Phoenix story line, in any century, but Diana Millay is quite good. It's interesting that Laura, with such an intimate relationship to fire, can be so icy.

27
Current Talk '12 I / Re: Discuss - Ep #0186
« on: April 10, 2012, 07:07:14 PM »
Here's what I was looking for that I didn't see: an indication that David Radcliff regretted being in the flames.
Same here. Although one could suppose that Laura's mystical hold over DR was so strong that, even in the afterlife, her son was incapable of escaping it. However, as Magnus points out:
What we can read into all this is that DR didn't go off to wonderful Phoenixland as a result of the flames, or he probably wouldn't have been a ghost obsessing on the burning.
I agree. Which to me, frankly, makes Laura an even more wretched piece of work. Despite the outward appearance of maternal love, she's merely concerned with achieving her goal, which benefits her alone. I think there was a missed opportunity in explaining why taking her children with her was so important. On the one hand, if she was pure evil, were the children a sacrifice to ensure her continued supernatural existence? If, however, the children end up in a fabulous paradise, it would have been interesting to see some internal conflict on Laura's part, knowing the immolation was a horrible end, but peace was ensured on the other side. That being said, I know she was meant to be a villain, so villain it is. I save myself a headache by avoiding the "what ifs?"

Quote
How can DR, a ghost from elsewhere, appear at a seance designed for Josette, occupant of the house, to communicate better?
I wondered the same thing; he has no attachment to the house. Perhaps because Laura was in the general vicinity and had previously been in the Old House, he was able to make a brief appearance? 

28
Current Talk '05 I / Re: Chris Jennings
« on: April 06, 2012, 06:26:40 PM »
I know this is an old topic, but since Chris is one of my favorite characters:

1) My favorite is Chris' initial story line. I thought Briscoe really conveyed the inner torment and anguish of the character and several of the scenes with Amy were very sweet and organic. They really felt like a big brother/little sister.

2) I would have liked to see the Jennings acknowledged as Collinses and for Quentin and Chris to interact more. Even if not on screen, mention could have been made that the two spent some evenings talking. Which brings me to a rather radical thought. Had the show ended in present time, I would have wanted Chris to be cured, via Quentin. As controversial as it may be, I had the idea that Quentin, just as a full moon is rising, destroys his portrait and kills himself with a silver bullet. His sacrifice for his family permanently lifts the curse.

3) Leaving the actress out of it, I can't deny Sabrina was devoted to Chris, so she didn't bother me that much. After a point in the Leviathan era, she was really the only one helping him. It irked me that Julia tried to help Jeb through blood analysis, etc. and all she seemed to do for Chris was lock him in a padded cell at Windcliff. I did like Chris and Carolyn, though. I'm undecided, maybe someone else completely. Perhaps Chris kills Sabrina, which leads to Quentin's actions stated above.

4) I accept the car accident. It happens.

5) The show was already on the decline, but I think Briscoe could have added something to PT. I don't know how much his sudden departure changed the game plan down the line. I was sorry to see him go, but I don't think the show would have lasted longer or been markedly improved if he hadn't. 

Pages: « 1 2