DARK SHADOWS FORUMS

Members' Mausoleum => Calendar Events / Announcements Archive => Calendar Events / Announcements '24 I => Calendar Events / Announcements '07 I => Topic started by: Mysterious Benefactor on June 15, 2007, 03:42:43 AM

Title: Two Boston Newspaper Articles Refer To DS
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on June 15, 2007, 03:42:43 AM
One that could be considered favorably:

Mistress of Goth marks anniversary (http://www.boston.com/news/globe/living/articles/2007/06/08/mistress_of_goth_marks_anniversary/)


One that most definitely would not:

A ‘Day’ you want to forget (http://theedge.bostonherald.com/movieReviews/view.bg?articleid=1005330)


(But then, you can't win 'em all. However, it's also true that many people wouldn't even use the Boston Herald to housebreak their pets, so it's not like they put much stock in the opinions expressed in the paper.  :D)
Title: Re: Two Boston Newspaper Articles Refer To DS
Post by: Mysterious Benefactor on June 15, 2007, 11:34:38 PM
Another review with a not so flattering reference to DS:

'Meadowlands' a suspenseful, sexy noir for Showtime (http://smallscreen.monstersandcritics.com/features/article_1317890.php/Review_Meadowlands_a_suspenseful_sexy_noir_for_Showtime)

This had better not turn into a pattern. DS had been doing so well over the past four years with all sorts of flattering references in the media.
Title: Re: Two Boston Newspaper Articles Refer To DS
Post by: Gothick on June 15, 2007, 11:55:29 PM
Mistress Laura sounds like a kick.  I'd love to hear her show!

G.
Title: Re: Two Boston Newspaper Articles Refer To DS
Post by: arashi on June 16, 2007, 01:21:12 AM
Boo! Hiss! That was a low knock, obviously said by someone who has no idea of the production values of daytime television in the 1960s.
Title: Re: Two Boston Newspaper Articles Refer To DS
Post by: jennifer on June 17, 2007, 05:27:07 AM
(But then, you can't win 'em all. However, it's also true that many people wouldn't even use the Boston Herald to housebreak their pets, so it's not like they put much stock in the opinions expressed in the paper.  :D)


 [lghy] [lghy]